The big wrench vs. integrated approaches: The great media debate

This article sums up the current state of the media debate by comparing and contrasting the seven positions presented in the ETR&D special issue (Vol. 42(2), 1994). Presented first is a review of the science-wide conflict between advocates of a given approach versus proponents of integrated approaches to the solving of complex problems. Advocates of a given approach are characterized as offering a “big wrench” (i.e., panacea) solution that can be generalized across problems. While in contrast are integrated approaches (e.g., the Swiss knife) that attempt to solve problems by bringing together a variety of variables and conditions. In section two is presented an example of an integrated approach that deals directly with the role of media in learning. Finally, the positions of the seven authors are compared and contrasted employing eight instructional design variables.

[1]  R. Clark Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[2]  Robert D. Tennyson,et al.  Linking cognitive learning theory to instructional prescriptions , 1988 .

[3]  Robert D. Tennyson,et al.  Complex-dynamic simulations to improve higher-order thinking strategies , 1991 .

[4]  R. Kozma Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate , 1994 .

[5]  Robert D. Tennyson Tracing cognitive processes of learning and cognition to computer-based enhancements , 1991 .

[6]  Gary R. Morrison,et al.  The media effects question: “Unresolvable” or asking the right question , 1994 .

[7]  Sharon A. Shrock,et al.  The media influence debate: Read the fine print, but don't lose sight of the big picture , 1994 .

[8]  Robert D. Tennyson,et al.  Structured Versus Constructed Instructional Strategies for Improving Concept Acquisition by Domain-Experienced and Domain-Novice Learners. , 1991 .

[9]  R. Gagne Conditions of Learning , 1965 .

[10]  Robert D. Tennyson,et al.  Advancements in instructional design theory: Contextual module analysis and integrated instructional strategies , 1992 .

[11]  B. White ThinkerTools: Causal Models, Conceptual Change, and Science Education , 1993 .

[12]  R. Kozma Learning with Media , 1991 .

[13]  R. Tennyson,et al.  Instance sequence and analysis of instance attribute representation in concept acquisition , 1975 .

[14]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Learningwith media: Restructuring the debate , 1994 .

[15]  B. Skinner The science of learning and the art of teaching. , 1954 .

[16]  Robert D. Tennyson,et al.  ISD EXPERT: An Automated Approach to Instructional Design , 1994 .

[17]  R. Tennyson,et al.  Clark’s “learning from media”: A critique , 1984 .

[18]  Robert D. Tennyson,et al.  Interactive effect of information structure sequence of information and process learning time on rule learning using computer-based instruction , 1985 .

[19]  Robert D. Tennyson,et al.  Cognitive-based design guidelines for using video and computer technology in course development , 1984 .

[20]  Klaus Breuer,et al.  Cognitive effects from process learning with computer-based simulations , 1990 .

[21]  Robert A. Reiser Clark's invitation to the dance: An instructional Designer's response , 1994 .

[22]  Robert D. Tennyson,et al.  Imagery instructions and drawings in learning prose. , 1975 .

[23]  Robert D. Tennyson,et al.  Computer-based enhancements for the improvement of learning: Design and effects , 1987 .

[24]  R. Clark Media will never influence learning , 1994 .

[25]  Robert D. Tennyson,et al.  Artificial intelligence and computer-based learning , 1990 .