Risk-consistent calibration of load factors for the design of reinforced concrete bridges under the combined effects of earthquake and scour hazards

Abstract Current bridge design specifications deal with various extreme hazards independently, which may lead to less economic design and construction practices, and may also underestimate failure probabilities. Therefore, a multi-hazard bridge design framework is required to guide the future design of new bridges or the retrofit of existing ones. This paper lays the foundation toward a risk-based design approach to combine earthquake and scour hazards. First, the development of a new multi-hazard probabilistic seismic demand model is proposed, which is the basis for calculating a combined fragility surface as a function of earthquake and scour hazards. Then, the joint failure probability of the bridge can be obtained by convolving the combined bridge fragility surface with the earthquake and scour hazard curves at a given site. Load combination factors for design are then determined by comparing the joint failure probability and the failure probability of the bridge for a certain scour depth. Results for the case studies considered suggest the use of a scour load factor equal to 0.59 to combine with the earthquake hazard. This risk-consistent multi-hazard bridge design framework provides a basis for exploring combinations of earthquake and scour loads for additional bridge types and geometries, while being consistent with the practical load and resistance factor design (LRFD) methodology.

[1]  Sun Baitao Study on combination of internal forces on bridges subjected to earthquake and heavy trucks based on Ferry Borges theory , 2011 .

[2]  P A Johnson,et al.  Comparison of Pier-Scour Equations Using Field Data , 1995 .

[3]  F. C. Hadipriono,et al.  ANALYSIS OF RECENT BRIDGE FAILURES IN THE UNITED STATES , 2003 .

[4]  Leonardo Dueñas-Osorio,et al.  Seismic response of a bridge–soil–foundation system under the combined effect of vertical and horizontal ground motions , 2013 .

[5]  Kevin R. Mackie,et al.  Seismic Demands for Performance-Based Design of Bridges , 2003 .

[6]  Mervyn J. Kowalsky,et al.  Displacement-based design of RC bridge columns in seismic regions , 1995 .

[7]  Mervyn J. Kowalsky,et al.  A displacement‐based approach for the seismic design of continuous concrete bridges , 2002 .

[8]  Peggy A. Johnson,et al.  PROBABILISTIC BRIDGE SCOUR ESTIMATES , 1998 .

[9]  Peggy A. Johnson Uncertainty of Hydraulic Parameters , 1996 .

[10]  Yue Li,et al.  Probabilistic loss assessment of light-frame wood construction subjected to combined seismic and snow loads , 2011 .

[11]  Kevin R. Mackie,et al.  R-Factor Parameterized Bridge Damage Fragility Curves , 2007 .

[12]  M. Neaz Sheikh,et al.  Seismic performance-based design of bridges with quantitative local performance criteria , 2010 .

[13]  Swagata Banerjee,et al.  Seismic risk assessment of reinforced concrete bridges in flood-prone regions , 2013 .

[14]  Leonardo Dueñas-Osorio,et al.  Influence of Soil-Structure Interaction and Liquefaction on the Isolation Efficiency of a Typical Multispan Continuous Steel Girder Bridge , 2014 .

[15]  Behrouz Shafei,et al.  Reliability-Based Calibration of Load and Resistance Factors for Design of RC Bridges under Multiple Extreme Events: Scour and Earthquake , 2013 .

[16]  Bryan E. Little,et al.  American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Highway Drainage Guidelines American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. LRFD Bridge Design Specifications , 2000 .

[17]  J. Mander,et al.  Theoretical stress strain model for confined concrete , 1988 .

[18]  Karthik Narayan Ramanathan,et al.  Next generation seismic fragility curves for california bridges incorporating the evolution in seismic design philosophy , 2012 .

[19]  Jamie E. Padgett,et al.  Risk-based seismic life-cycle cost–benefit (LCC-B) analysis for bridge retrofit assessment , 2010 .

[20]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC DEMAND MODELS AND FRAGILITY ESTIMATES FOR RC BRIDGES , 2003 .

[21]  Daniel W. Wilson,et al.  Seismic Soil-Pile-Structure Interaction Experiments and Analyses , 1999 .

[22]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Combining Snow and Earthquake Loads for Limit States Design , 1996 .

[23]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Time‐variant sustainability assessment of seismically vulnerable bridges subjected to multiple hazards , 2013 .

[24]  Leonardo Dueñas-Osorio,et al.  Seismic Reliability Assessment of Bridges with User-Defined System Failure Events , 2011 .

[25]  Kyung Ho Lee,et al.  Fragility analysis of woodframe buildings considering combined snow and earthquake loading , 2006 .