Vortical Structures and Instability Analysis for Athena Wetted Transom Flow with Full-Scale Validation

Vortical structures and associated instabilities of appended Athena wetted transom flow in full-scale conditions are studied using DES to explain the source of dominant transom flow frequency, including verification and validation using full-scale experimental data. The results are also compared with model-scale bare and appended hull predictions and experiments. The grid used for the validation is sufficiently fine as it resolves 70% and 91% of the experimental inertial subrange and turbulent kinetic energy values, respectively. The model-scale bare and appended hull resistance predictions compare within 2.5%D and 5.4%D of the experimental data D, respectively. The full-scale appended hull resistance predictions compare within 4.2%D of the extrapolated data using the ITTC line. The averaged comparison error of the full-scale transom wave elevation mean, RMS and dominant frequency predictions and the experimental data is 8.1%D, and the predictions are validated at an averaged 11.2%D interval. The transom wave elevation unsteadiness is attributed to the Karman-like transom vortex shedding as both show the same dominant frequency. The Karman-like instability shows St = 0.148 for the bare hull and St = 0.103 ± 4.4% for model- and full-scale appended hull. The appended hull simulations also predict: horseshoe vortices at the juncture of rudder-hull with St = 0.146 ± 3.9% and strut-hull with St = 0.053 ± 2%; shear layer instability at the strut-hull intersection with St = 0.0067 ± 3%; and unsteady sinkage and trim induced by transom vortex shedding with St = 2.19. The instabilities do not show significant variation on scale, propeller or motions. The bare hull simulation also predicts flapping-like instability in the wake with St = 0.144.

[1]  Thomas C. Fu,et al.  A Comparison of Full-Scale Experimental Measurements and Computational Predictions of the Transom-Stern Wave of the R/V Athena I , 2014, 1410.1810.

[2]  Frederick Stern,et al.  Scalability studies and large grid computations for surface combatant using CFDShip-Iowa , 2011, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl..

[3]  Thomas C. Fu,et al.  A Comparison of Model-Scale Experimental Measurements and Computational Predictions for a Large Transom-Stern Wave , 2010, 1410.1872.

[4]  Barry Smith,et al.  Large-scale DES computations of the forward speed diffraction and pitch and heave problems for a surface combatant , 2010 .

[5]  T. Xing,et al.  Factors of Safety for Richardson Extrapolation , 2010 .

[6]  Frederick Stern,et al.  URANS and DES analysis for a Wigley hull at extreme drift angles , 2010 .

[7]  Frederick Stern,et al.  Model-and Full-Scale URANS Simulations of Athena Resistance, Powering, Seakeeping, and 5415 Maneuvering , 2009 .

[8]  W. Vorus Closure of the Deep Wake Hollow of High-Speed Ships , 2009 .

[9]  Frederick Stern,et al.  Unsteady free surface wave-induced separation: Vortical structures and instabilities , 2009 .

[10]  K. Maki,et al.  Experiments of Two-Dimensional Transom Stern Flow , 2008 .

[11]  Frederick Stern,et al.  Computational Towing Tank Procedures for Single Run Curves of Resistance and Propulsion , 2008 .

[12]  Thomas T. Huang,et al.  Surface ship total resistance prediction based on a nonlinear free surface potential flow solver and a Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes viscous correction , 2007 .

[13]  Thomas C. Fu,et al.  Comparison of Predicted and Measured Wavefields for Model 5365 Hull Form , 2006 .

[14]  Jun Shao,et al.  Quantitative V&V of CFD simulations and certification of CFD codes , 2006 .

[15]  Pablo M. Carrica,et al.  URANS simulations for a high-speed transom stern ship with breaking waves , 2006 .

[16]  Thomas C. Fu,et al.  Characterization of the Steady Wave Field of the High Speed Transom Stern Ship - Model 5365 Hull Form , 2005 .

[17]  Hugh W. Coleman,et al.  Comprehensive Approach to Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations—Part 2: Application for Rans Simulation of a Cargo/Container Ship , 2001 .

[18]  S. Pope Turbulent Flows , 2000 .

[19]  L. Sigurdson The structure and control of a turbulent reattaching flow , 1995, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[20]  Laura L. Pauley,et al.  The unsteady structure of two‐dimensional steady laminar separation , 1993 .

[21]  P. Moin,et al.  Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows , 1988 .

[22]  Douglas S. Jenkins,et al.  Resistance Characteristics of the High Speed Transcom Stern Ship R/V athena in the Bare Hull Condition, Represented by DTNSRDC Model 5365 , 1984 .

[23]  P. Spalart Detached-Eddy Simulation , 2009 .

[24]  Frederick Stern,et al.  Unsteady free-surface wave-induced separation: analysis of turbulent structures using detached eddy simulation and single-phase level set , 2007 .

[25]  T. Xing,et al.  BKW- RS-DES of Unsteady Vortical Flow for KVLCC2 at Large Drift Angles , 2007 .

[26]  Auke van der Ploeg,et al.  Computation of transom-stern flows using a steady free-surface fitting RANS method , 2007 .

[27]  Hyung Jin Sung,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of turbulent mixed convection in a vertical annulus with a rotating inner cylinder , 2006 .

[28]  Jerzy Matusiak,et al.  Simulation of Modern Surface Ships With a Wetted Transom In a Viscous Flow , 2001 .

[29]  L. B. Crook,et al.  Powering Predictions for the R/V ATHENA (PG 94) Represented by Model 4950-1 with Design Propellers 4710 and 4711 , 1981 .