Typology of diatom communities and the influence of hydro-ecoregions: a study on the French hydrosystem scale.

By comparing diatom communities in natural and disturbed sites, indicators for different types and levels of anthropogenic disturbance can be found. As a first step, this study aims to describe the different natural and disturbed community types found throughout the French hydrosystem. 836 diatom samples were analysed with an unsupervised neural network, the self-organising-map, a well accepted method for community ordination. 11 different communities were identified, 5 corresponding to non-impacted or slightly impacted conditions and representing the diatom natural variability of our dataset. These 5 communities corresponded to 5 different hydro-ecoregions, i.e. 5 river types with similar geological context and range in altitude. The 6 other communities were typical of rivers under anthropogenic pressure. The influence of natural conditions within the hydro-ecoregions was overwhelmed by the nature and the intensity of the pollution at the sampling stations. This work was done in the context of the application and enforcement of the Water Framework Directive.

[1]  S. Lek,et al.  Spatial and temporal patterns of benthic invertebrate communities in an intermittent river (North Africa) , 2004 .

[2]  Young-Seuk Park,et al.  Water quality assessment using diatom assemblages and advanced modelling techniques , 2004 .

[3]  T. Kohonen.  Self-organized formation of topographically correct feature maps , 1982 .

[4]  Charles P. Hawkins,et al.  Evaluation of the use of landscape classifications for the prediction of freshwater biota: synthesis and recommendations , 2000, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[5]  G. Hofmann.  Aufwuchs-Diatomeen in Seen und ihre Eignung als Indikatoren der Trophie , 1994 .

[6]  J. Omernik.  Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States , 1987 .

[7]  Young-Seuk Park,et al.  Implementation of artificial neural networks in patterning and prediction of exergy in response to temporal dynamics of benthic macroinvertebrate communities in streams , 2001 .

[8]  Donald F. Charles,et al.  Distribution of benthic diatoms in U.S. rivers in relation to conductivity and ionic composition , 2003 .

[9]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[10]  B. Hill,et al.  Ecoregions and benthic diatom assemblages in Mid-Atlantic Highlands streams, USA , 2000, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[11]  J. Soininen.  Determinants of Benthic Diatom Community Structurein Boreal Streams: the Role of Environmental and Spatial Factors at Different Scales , 2004 .

[12]  R. Stevenson.  Scale-Dependent Determinants and Consequences of Benthic Algal Heterogeneity , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[13]  Friedrich Recknagel,et al.  Ecological Informatics: Understanding Ecology by Biologically-Inspired Computation , 2003 .

[14]  J. Soininen.  Responses of Epilithic Diatom Communities to Environmental Gradients in Some Finnish Rivers , 2002 .

[15]  B. Hill,et al.  SPATIAL PATTERNS AND ECOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS OF BENTHIC ALGAL ASSEMBLAGES IN MID‐ATLANTIC STREAMS, USA , 1999 .

[16]  Young-Seuk Park,et al.  Conservation Strategies for Endemic Fish Species Threatened by the Three Gorges Dam , 2003 .

[17]  R. Denzer.  Environmental Software Systems: Environmental Information and Decision Support, IFIP TC5 WG5.11 3rd International Symposium on Environmental Software Systems (ISESS'99), August 30 - September 2, 1999, Dunedin, New Zealand , 2000, ISESS.

[18]  S. Sabater,et al.  Ecological and biogeographical aspects of diatom distribution in Pyrenean springs , 1992 .

[19]  Sovan Lek,et al.  A comparison of self-organizing map algorithm and some conventional statistical methods for ecological community ordination , 2001 .

[20]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Applications of the self-organising feature map neural network in community data analysis , 1999 .

[21]  László Orlóci,et al.  Applying Metric and Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling to Ecological Studies: Some New Results , 1986 .

[22]  S. Lek,et al.  Applications of artificial neural networks for patterning and predicting aquatic insect species richness in running waters , 2003 .

[23]  B. Biggs,et al.  The contribution of flood disturbance, catchment geology and land use to the habitat template of periphyton in stream ecosystems , 1995 .

[24]  W. J. Walley,et al.  Self-Organising Maps for the Classification and Diagnosis of River Quality from Biological and Environmental Data , 1999, ISESS.

[25]  R. Céréghino,et al.  Spatial analysis of stream invertebrates distribution in the Adour-Garonne drainage basin (France), using Kohonen self organizing maps , 2001 .

[26]  Young-Seuk Park,et al.  Hierarchical community classification and assessment of aquatic ecosystems using artificial neural networks. , 2004, The Science of the total environment.

[27]  Young-Seuk Park,et al.  Patternizing communities by using an artificial neural network , 1996 .

[28]  J. Sinkeldam,et al.  A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from The Netherlands , 1994, Netherland Journal of Aquatic Ecology.

[29]  A. G. Frenich,et al.  Application of the Kohonen neural network in coastal water management: methodological development for the assessment and prediction of water quality. , 2001, Water research.