Energetics of paraplegic cycling: adaptations to 12 months of high volume training.

PURPOSE The efficiency of functional electrical-stimulation (FES) cycling in spinal cord injured and anaesthetised able-bodied cyclists has been found to be about one third of that reported during volitional cycling. The stimulation paradigm itself appears to be the main source of this inefficiency. It is unknown whether a period of high-volume training can induce adaptations that may influence the metabolic and electrical cost of FES cycling. METHOD 11 individuals with paraplegia completed a 12-month, home-based, progressive FES cycle training programme (up to 5 × 60 min per wk). Stimulation cost, oxygen cost, efficiency and markers of anaerobic metabolism were determined before and after 6 and 12 months of training, during constant work-rate tests. RESULTS Oxygen cost and efficiency did not significantly change after training. Total stimulation cost and blood lactate values reduced overall, while respiratory exchange ratios remained relatively high. CONCLUSIONS The high metabolic cost of FES cycling is a result of non-physiological recruitment of predominantly fast muscle fibres. The electrical cost of cycling reduced by 37%, probably due to motor unit hypertrophy, and lactate oxidation capacity improved.

[1]  A Frotzler,et al.  Relationship between the duration of paralysis and bone structure: a pQCT study of spinal cord injured individuals. , 2004, Bone.

[2]  M. Weiss,et al.  Influence of peak VO2 and muscle fiber type on the efficiency of moderate exercise. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  Kenneth J Hunt,et al.  Cardiorespiratory and power adaptations to stimulated cycle training in paraplegia. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  Chris M Gregory,et al.  Recruitment patterns in human skeletal muscle during electrical stimulation. , 2005, Physical therapy.

[5]  K J Hunt,et al.  Comparison of stimulation patterns for FES-cycling using measures of oxygen cost and stimulation cost. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[6]  T. Janssen,et al.  Effects of modified electrical stimulation-induced leg cycle ergometer training for individuals with spinal cord injury. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[7]  N. Secher,et al.  Cardiovascular and ventilatory responses to electrically induced cycling with complete epidural anaesthesia in humans. , 1994, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[8]  N.-O. Negard,et al.  Control strategies for integration of electric motor assist and functional electrical stimulation in paraplegic cycling: utility for exercise testing and mobile cycling , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  J. Duchateau,et al.  Motor unit recruitment order during voluntary and electrically induced contractions in the tibialis anterior , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  G. Dudley,et al.  Mapping of electrical muscle stimulation using MRI. , 1993, Journal of applied physiology.

[11]  Kenneth J Hunt,et al.  Training and Detraining of a Tetraplegic Subject: High-Volume FES Cycle Training , 2008, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[12]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  Inference of motor unit recruitment order in voluntary and electrically elicited contractions. , 1990, Journal of applied physiology.

[13]  K. Ragnarsson.  Functional electrical stimulation after spinal cord injury: current use, therapeutic effects and future directions , 2008, Spinal Cord.

[14]  Kenneth J Hunt,et al.  High-volume FES-cycling partially reverses bone loss in people with chronic spinal cord injury. , 2008, Bone.

[15]  E Hultman,et al.  Energy cost and fatigue during intermittent electrical stimulation of human skeletal muscle. , 1988, Journal of applied physiology.

[16]  P. Lugner,et al.  Dynamic simulation of FES-cycling: influence of individual parameters , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  S. Perrey,et al.  Effect of endurance training on different mechanical efficiency indices during submaximal cycling in subjects unaccustomed to cycling. , 2005, Canadian journal of applied physiology = Revue canadienne de physiologie appliquee.

[18]  R M Glaser,et al.  Functional electrical stimulation leg cycle ergometer exercise: training effects on cardiorespiratory responses of spinal cord injured subjects at rest and during submaximal exercise. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  W P Morgan,et al.  Psychogenic factors and exercise metabolism: a review. , 1985, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  K. J. Hunt,et al.  Energetics of paraplegic cycling: a new theoretical framework and efficiency characterisation for untrained subjects , 2007, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[21]  E. Coyle,et al.  Cycling efficiency is related to the percentage of type I muscle fibers. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[22]  G. Hunter,et al.  Inverse relationship between exercise economy and oxidative capacity in muscle , 2005, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[23]  G M Davis,et al.  Effects of electrical stimulation‐induced leg training on skeletal muscle adaptability in spinal cord injury , 2002, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[24]  B. Whipp,et al.  Gas exchange kinetics during functional electrical stimulation in subjects with spinal cord injury. , 1995, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[25]  K. Sahlin,et al.  Cycling efficiency in humans is related to low UCP3 content and to type I fibres but not to mitochondrial efficiency , 2006, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  J Bangsbo,et al.  Long term adaptation to electrically induced cycle training in severe spinal cord injured individuals , 1997, Spinal Cord.

[27]  P R Cavanagh,et al.  Mechanical and muscular factors affecting the efficiency of human movement. , 1985, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[28]  L. Gladden.  Lactate metabolism: a new paradigm for the third millennium , 2004, The Journal of physiology.