A spiking neural network model of the locust antennal lobe: Towards neuromorphic electronic noses inspired from insect olfaction

In analogy with the non-selectivity of gas sensors, an olfactory receptor neuron is not tuned to a specific odor and hence presents a lack of selectivity. Despite this shortcoming, insects have impressive abilities to recognize odors. Understanding how their olfactory system works could then be highly beneficial for designing efficient electronic noses. In particular, the antennal lobe, the first structure of the insect olfactory system, is known to encode odors by spatio-temporal patterns of activation of projection neurons. We propose here a simplified, but still biologically plausible, model of the locust antennal lobe. Our model is a network of single variable spiking neurons coupled via simple exponential synapses. Its reduced complexity allows a deeper understanding of the mechanisms responsible of the network oscillatory behavior and of the spatio-temporal coding of the stimulus. In particular, we show how a stimulus is robustly encoded at each oscillation of the network by a spatial assembly of quasi-synchronized projection neurons, each one being individually phase-locked to the local field potential. Moreover, it is shown that frequency adaptation is responsible of the temporal evolution of this spatial code and that this temporal aspect of the code is crucial in enhancing the distance between the representations of similar odors.

[1]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  SPIKING NEURON MODELS Single Neurons , Populations , Plasticity , 2002 .

[2]  Ramón Huerta,et al.  Learning Classification in the Olfactory System of Insects , 2004, Neural Computation.

[3]  H. Ishida,et al.  An odor compass for localizing an odor source , 1996 .

[4]  G. Laurent Dynamical representation of odors by oscillating and evolving neural assemblies , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[5]  Nancy Kopell,et al.  Synchronization in Networks of Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons with Sparse, Random Connectivity , 2003, Neural Computation.

[6]  Glenn C. Turner,et al.  Oscillations and Sparsening of Odor Representations in the Mushroom Body , 2002, Science.

[7]  G. Laurent,et al.  Impaired odour discrimination on desynchronization of odour-encoding neural assemblies , 1997, Nature.

[8]  Dominique Martinez,et al.  Navigation strategies for a robot in a turbulent odor plume using bilateral comparison , 2003 .

[9]  Peter König,et al.  Mechanisms to synchronize neuronal activity , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[10]  G. Laurent,et al.  Odor encoding as an active, dynamical process: experiments, computation, and theory. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Which model to use for cortical spiking neurons? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[12]  Bard Ermentrout,et al.  Type I Membranes, Phase Resetting Curves, and Synchrony , 1996, Neural Computation.

[13]  P. Duchamp-Viret,et al.  Odor response properties of rat olfactory receptor neurons. , 1999, Science.

[14]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Model of Transient Oscillatory Synchronization in the Locust Antennal Lobe , 2001, Neuron.

[15]  Alex M. Andrew,et al.  Spiking Neuron Models: Single Neurons, Populations, Plasticity , 2003 .

[16]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Neural excitability, Spiking and bursting , 2000, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[17]  F. Theunissen From synchrony to sparseness , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  Takamichi Nakamoto,et al.  Three-dimensional odor compass , 1999, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[19]  G. Laurent,et al.  Temporal Representations of Odors in an Olfactory Network , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  G. Laurent,et al.  Dynamic optimization of odor representations by slow temporal patterning of mitral cell activity. , 2001, Science.