Conservation implications of the link between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning

The relationship between biodiversity and individual ecosystem processes is often asymptotic, saturating at relatively low levels, with some species contributing more strongly than others. This has cast doubt on arguments for conservation based on maintenance of the functioning of ecosystems. However, we argue that the link between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning is an important additional argument for conservation for several reasons. (1) Although species differ in importance to ecosystem processes, we do not believe that this argues for preservation of just a few species for two reasons: first, it is nearly impossible to identify all species important to the numerous systems and processes on which humans depend; second, the important species themselves may depend on an unknown number of other species in their communities. (2) Arguments for conservation based on ecosystem functioning are complementary to other utilitarian, ethical and aesthetic justifications. No single reason will convince all people or protect all species, however the combination produces a strong case for conservation of biodiversity. (3) Even if the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning is asymptotic at local spatial scales and in the short term, effects of biodiversity loss are likely to be important at larger temporal and spatial scales. (4) Initial arguments for the importance of biodiversity for ecosystem functioning were largely based on a precautionary approach (points 1–3). However, we are now moving to a scientific position based on accumulating experimental evidence. The future challenge is the integration of this scientific research with policy.

[1]  J. Castilla,et al.  Challenges in the Quest for Keystones , 1996 .

[2]  John H. Lawton,et al.  What Do Species Do in Ecosystems , 1994 .

[3]  J. Kaiser Rift Over Biodiversity Divides Ecologists , 2000, Science.

[4]  Peter Chesson,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL NICHES AND ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING , 2006 .

[5]  F. Chapin,et al.  Consequences of changing biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[6]  Meine van Noordwijk,et al.  Global change and multi-species agroecosystems : Concepts and issues , 1998 .

[7]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Jenny L. McCune,et al.  The influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on the relationship between plant diversity and productivity , 2000 .

[9]  David A. Wardle,et al.  Stability of ecosystem properties in response to above‐ground functional group richness and composition , 2000 .

[10]  Peter M. Vitousek,et al.  Biological invasions and ecosystem processes : towards an integration of population biology and ecosystem studies , 1990 .

[11]  D. Tilman Diversity and Production in European Grasslands , 1999, Science.

[12]  Stephen R. Kellert,et al.  The Value of Life, Biological Diversity and Human Society , 1995 .

[13]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances , 2000 .

[14]  P. Reich,et al.  The Influence of Functional Diversity and Composition on Ecosystem Processes , 1997 .

[15]  A. Purvis,et al.  Getting the measure of biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[16]  P. Dayton,et al.  Reversal of the Burden of Proof in Fisheries Management , 1998, Science.

[17]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[18]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function: An Issue in Ecology , 2000 .

[19]  D. Tilman THE ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF CHANGES IN BIODIVERSITY: A SEARCH FOR GENERAL PRINCIPLES101 , 1999 .

[20]  D. Doak,et al.  The Statistical Inevitability of Stability‐Diversity Relationships in Community Ecology , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[21]  P. Vitousek,et al.  The Effects of Plant Composition and Diversity on Ecosystem Processes , 1997 .

[22]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Biological Diversity and Terrestrial Ecosystem Biogeochemistry , 1994 .

[23]  Shahid Naeem,et al.  Species Redundancy and Ecosystem Reliability , 1998 .

[24]  B. Schmid,et al.  Empirical Evidence for Biodiversity–Ecosystem Functioning Relationships , 2016 .

[25]  J. Lawton,et al.  Does biodiversity matter? Evaluation the case for conserving species , 1996 .

[26]  B. Trenbath Multispecies cropping systems in India: Predictions of their productivity, stability, resilience and ecological sustainability , 1999, Agroforestry Systems.

[27]  Peter J. Edwards,et al.  The value of biodiversity : Where ecology and economy blend , 1998 .

[28]  I. Seidl,et al.  Expert Estimates about Effects of Biodiversity on Ecosystem Processes and Services , 1999 .

[29]  D. Tilman,et al.  Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. , 2000, Science.

[31]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Pereira,et al.  Plant diversity and productivity experiments in european grasslands , 1999, Science.

[33]  I. Seidl,et al.  Monetäre Bewertung von Biodiversität: Grundannahmen, Schritte, Probleme und Folgerungen , 1999 .

[34]  J. Lawton,et al.  Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems , 1994, Nature.

[35]  Jason D. Hoeksema,et al.  Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecology , 2000, Oecologia.

[36]  D. Tilman,et al.  Diversity‐Stability Relationships: Statistical Inevitability or Ecological Consequence? , 1998, The American Naturalist.