A framework to identify factors influencing navigational risk for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships

Abstract Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) have recently drawn significant attention throughout academia, governments, and industry. One of the requirements for MASS is that they should at least be as safe as conventional ships. Often, to measure their level of safety, the concept of risk is adopted, and risk influencing factors are determined. This paper proposes a framework for the identification of factors that influence the navigational risk of remotely controlled MASS without crews on board. Therein, four operational phases are considered: voyage planning, berthing and unberthing, port approaching and departing, as well as open sea navigation. For each phase, four types of factors are assigned related to human, ship, environment, and technology. To populate the framework, a thorough literature review is conducted, which is further supported by the elicitation of expert knowledge. As a result, 23 human-related factors, 12 ship-related factors, 8 environment-related factors, and 12 technology-related factors were defined. The proposed framework can be employed for any risk and safety analysis related to remote-controlled MASS. This, in turn, may assist the processes of design and operational planning of maritime transportation systems accommodating MASS and its remote-control center, e.g., the shore control center.

[1]  Kayvan Pazouki,et al.  Investigation on the impact of human-automation interaction in maritime operations , 2018 .

[2]  Christoph A. Thieme,et al.  Safety performance monitoring of autonomous marine systems , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Towards the assessment of potential impact of unmanned vessels on maritime transportation safety , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  Monica Lundh,et al.  From Desk to Field - Human Factor Issues in Remote Monitoring and Controlling of Autonomous Unmanned Vessels☆ , 2015 .

[5]  Asgeir J. Sørensen,et al.  Towards supervisory risk control of autonomous ships , 2020, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Carlos Jahn,et al.  Analyzing the economic benefit of unmanned autonomous ships: An exploratory cost-comparison between an autonomous and a conventional bulk carrier , 2017 .

[7]  Ingrid Bouwer Utne,et al.  Collision avoidance on maritime autonomous surface ships: Operators’ tasks and human failure events , 2019, Safety Science.

[8]  Thanasis Karlis Maritime law issues related to the operation of unmanned autonomous cargo ships , 2018 .

[9]  Runar Ostnes,et al.  Is Full-autonomy the Way to Go Towards Maximizing the Ocean Potentials? , 2019, TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation.

[10]  Monica Lundh,et al.  Ship sense—striving for harmony in ship manoeuvring , 2013 .

[11]  Hristos Karahalios The severity of shipboard communication failures in maritime emergencies: A risk management approach , 2018 .

[12]  Ø Rødseth,et al.  A risk based approach to the design of unmanned ship control systems , 2014 .

[13]  Xue Yang,et al.  Risk influence frameworks for activity-related risk analysis during operation: A literature review , 2017 .

[14]  Monica Lundh,et al.  Human factor issues during remote ship monitoring tasks: An ecological lesson for system design in a distributed context , 2018, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics.

[15]  Ørnulf Jan Rødseth From concept to reality: Unmanned merchant ship research in Norway , 2017 .

[16]  Romanas Puisa,et al.  Unravelling causal factors of maritime incidents and accidents , 2018, Safety Science.

[17]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Towards realistic estimation of ship excessive motions in heavy weather. A case study of a containership in the Pacific Ocean , 2017 .

[18]  Sirpa Kannos,et al.  Hazard analysis process for autonomous vessels , 2019 .

[19]  Sauli Ahvenjärvi,et al.  The Human Element and Autonomous Ships , 2016 .

[20]  Jaakko Hakulinen,et al.  Human Factors Challenges in Unmanned Ship Operations – Insights from Other Domains , 2015 .

[21]  Pentti Kujala,et al.  Towards a method for detecting large roll motions suitable for oceangoing ships , 2018, Applied Ocean Research.

[22]  Henrik Ringbom,et al.  Regulating Autonomous Ships—Concepts, Challenges and Precedents , 2019, Ocean Development & International Law.

[23]  Chin-Shan Lu,et al.  Effects of national culture on human failures in container shipping: the moderating role of Confucian dynamism. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Thomas Porathe,et al.  Can unmanned ships improve navigational safety , 2014 .

[25]  Thomas Koester,et al.  Methods and means for analysis of crew communication in the maritime domain , 2005 .

[26]  Thomas Porathe,et al.  Autonomous Unmanned Merchant Vessel and its Contribution towards the e-Navigation Implementation: The MUNIN Perspective , 2014 .

[27]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Expert elicitation of a navigation service implementation effects on ship groundings and collisions in the Gulf of Finland , 2014 .

[28]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  Human-system concurrent task analysis for maritime autonomous surface ship operation and safety , 2020, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[29]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Towards the Development of a Risk Model for Unmanned Vessels Design and Operations , 2016 .

[30]  Knut Øien Risk indicators as a tool for risk control , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[31]  Monica Lundh,et al.  Seeking harmony in shore-based unmanned ship handling – From the perspective of human factors, what is the difference we need to focus on from being onboard to onshore? , 2014 .

[32]  Kerrie L. Mengersen,et al.  A proposed validation framework for expert elicited Bayesian Networks , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[33]  Sung-Ho Shin,et al.  Half-century research developments in maritime accidents: Future directions. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[34]  Rolf J. Bye,et al.  Maritime navigation accidents and risk indicators: An exploratory statistical analysis using AIS data and accident reports , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[35]  L. Dobryakova,et al.  The vulnerability of unmanned vehicles to terrorist attacks such as GNSS-spoofing , 2015 .

[36]  K. E. Knutsen,et al.  Towards a framework for assurance of autonomous navigation systems in the maritime industry , 2018 .

[37]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  System-theoretic approach to safety of remotely-controlled merchant vessel , 2018 .

[38]  Stig Ole Johnsen,et al.  At least as safe as manned shipping? Autonomous shipping, safety and “human error” , 2018, Safety and Reliability – Safe Societies in a Changing World.

[39]  Thomas Porathe,et al.  SITUATION AWARENESS IN REMOTE CONTROL CENTRES FOR UNMANNED SHIPS , 2014 .

[40]  Thomas Porathe A navigating navigator onboard or a monitoring operator ashore? Towards safe, effective, and sustainable maritime transportation: findings from five recent EU projects , 2016 .

[41]  Vikram Garaniya,et al.  Review and analysis of fire and explosion accidents in maritime transportation , 2018 .

[42]  Samrat Ghosh,et al.  Autonomous merchant vessels: examination of factors that impact the effective implementation of unmanned ships , 2016 .

[43]  Maria Hänninen,et al.  Bayesian network model of maritime safety management , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[44]  Magnus Hontvedt,et al.  Professional vision in simulated environments — Examining professional maritime pilots' performance of work tasks in a full-mission ship simulator , 2015 .

[45]  Thomas Porathe,et al.  Remote Monitoring and Control of Unmanned Vessels –The MUNIN Shore Control Centre , 2014 .

[46]  Floris Goerlandt,et al.  Validity and validation of safety-related quantitative risk analysis , 2016 .

[47]  Asgeir J. Sørensen,et al.  Risk management of autonomous marine systems and operations , 2017 .

[48]  Ørnulf Jan Rødseth,et al.  Risk Assessment for an Unmanned Merchant Ship , 2015 .

[49]  Hans-Christoph Burmeister,et al.  Interaction of Harsh Weather Operation and Collision Avoidance in Autonomous Navigation , 2015 .

[50]  Xiang Yu Zhou,et al.  Quantitative Processing of Situation Awareness for Autonomous Ships Navigation , 2019, TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation.

[51]  Masao Furusho,et al.  Conversion Timing of Seafarer's Decision-making for Unmanned Ship Navigation , 2017 .

[52]  Sabine Knapp,et al.  Evaluation of total risk exposure and insurance premiums in the maritime industry , 2017 .

[53]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Human-Automation Interaction , 2005 .

[54]  Jongpil Jeong,et al.  Components for Smart Autonomous Ship Architecture Based on Intelligent Information Technology , 2018, FNC/MobiSPC.

[55]  Eric Van Hooydonk,et al.  The law of unmanned merchant shipping: an exploration , 2014 .

[56]  Toshiyuki Matsumoto Guidelines for Concept Design of Automated Operation/Autonomous Operation of Ships (Provisional Version) , 2019 .

[57]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  Accounting for human failure in autonomous ship operations , 2018, Safety and Reliability – Safe Societies in a Changing World.

[58]  Stig Ole Johnsen,et al.  Empirical Studies of Methods for Safety and Security Co-analysis of Autonomous Boat , 2018 .

[59]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Towards the development of a system-theoretic model for safety assessment of autonomous merchant vessels , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[60]  Iraklis Lazakis,et al.  Condition monitoring for enhanced inspection, maintenance and decision making in ship operations , 2016 .

[61]  Stein Haugen,et al.  Assessing ship risk model applicability to Marine Autonomous Surface Ships , 2018, Ocean Engineering.