Interaction, Mediation, and Ties: An Analytic Hierarchy for Socio-Technical Systems

To understand how technological designs encourage synergistic encounters between people and ideas within socio-technical systems, techniques are needed to bridge between levels of description from process traces such as log data, through individual trajectories of activity that interact with each other, to dynamic networks of associations that are both created by and further shape these interactions. Towards this end, we have developed an analytic hierarchy and associated representations. Process traces are abstracted to contingency and uptake graphs: directed graphs that record observed relationships (contingencies) between events that offer evidence for interaction and other influences between actors (uptake). Contingency graphs are further abstracted to associograms: two-mode directed graphs that record how associations between actors are mediated by digital artifacts. Patterns in associograms summarize sequential patterns of interaction. Transitive closure of associograms yields sociograms, to which existing network analytic techniques may be applied. We discuss how the hierarchy bridges between theoretical levels of analysis.

[1]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Bringing representational practice from log to light , 2008, ICLS.

[2]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Information sharing is incongruous with collaborative convergence: the case for interaction , 2007, CSCL.

[3]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[4]  S. Derry,et al.  Video Research in the Learning Sciences , 2007 .

[5]  FisherCarolanne,et al.  Exploratory sequential data analysis , 1993 .

[6]  S. L. Star,et al.  The Ethnography of Infrastructure , 1999 .

[7]  B. Latour.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[8]  H. Garfinkel.  Studies in Ethnomethodology , 1968 .

[9]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Testing Multitheoretical, Multilevel Hypotheses About Organizational Networks: An Analytic Framework and Empirical Example , 2006 .

[10]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  An Abstract Transcript Notation for Analyzing Interactional Construction of Meaning in Online Learning , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[11]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Inscriptions becoming representations , 2009, CSCL.

[12]  N. Ding,et al.  Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices – CSCL2009 Conference Proceedings , 2009 .

[13]  Alessandro Duranti,et al.  Transcripts, Like Shadows on a Wall , 2006 .

[14]  Penelope M. Sanderson,et al.  Exploratory Sequential Data Analysis: Foundations , 1994, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[15]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  A framework for conceptualizing, representing, and analyzing distributed interaction , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[16]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Theories of Communication Networks , 2003 .

[17]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Using a Contingency Graph to Discover Representational Practices in an Online Collaborative Environment , 2009, Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn..

[18]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: An Introduction 1 , 2010 .

[19]  Mark S. Schlager,et al.  Building Virtual Communities: Evolution of an Online Education Community of Practice , 2002 .

[20]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice , 1995 .

[21]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Identifying Mediators of Socio-Technical Capital in a Networked Learning Environment. , 2010 .

[22]  Umer Farooq,et al.  Sustaining a Community Computing Infrastructure for Online Teacher Professional Development: A Case Study of Designing Tapped In , 2009, Learning in Communities.

[23]  H. Blumer,et al.  Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method , 1988 .