A method for teacher inquiry in cross-curricular projects: Lessons from a case study

Many changes in teaching practices (such as introduction of e-assessment) are initiated by school management, or by a lead teacher, but have direct impact on the learning designs of others. However, models of teachers as innovators, conducting evidence-based inquiry into their students' learning, view the teacher as initiator of change in their own practice (normally as individual). This paper addresses the question of whether such models can also be applied to change introduced by top-down processes. In this paper, we examine teacher inquiry in such a context. We discuss a JOUR study in which we worked with the Head of Science ( HoS) of a secondary school. The HoS designed a cross-curricular science, technology, engineering and mathematics ( STEM) project with 57 STEM teachers and introduced Google Forms as a tool for formative assessment. We supported the HoS to design and conduct an inquiry that involved all teachers. We examine the context and process of inquiry and how it was applied. Our findings provide insight into teachers' use of tools and representations when communicating about learning design, and the implications of this for the development of learning analytics tools. They also inform the development of a method for coordinating teacher inquiry in cross-curricular projects and, more generally, in the context of top-down introduction of change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  Nobuko Fujita,et al.  Scholarship at UWindsor Scholarship at UWindsor Towards Visual Analytics for Teachers’ Dynamic Diagnostic Towards Visual Analytics for Teachers’ Dynamic Diagnostic Pedagogical Decision-Making Pedagogical Decision-Making , 2011 .

[2]  KayJudy,et al.  Student Models that Invite the Learner In: The SMILI:() Open Learner Modelling Framework , 2007 .

[3]  Matthew D. Pistilli,et al.  Course signals at Purdue: using learning analytics to increase student success , 2012, LAK.

[4]  Ulrik Schroeder,et al.  Supporting action research with learning analytics , 2013, LAK '13.

[5]  Bob Moon,et al.  Extract from new understandings of teachers' pedagogic knowledge 1 , 2005 .

[6]  Andy Hargreaves,et al.  The Sustainability of Innovative Schools as Learning Organizations and Professional Learning Communities During Standardized Reform , 2006 .

[7]  Mary Thorpe,et al.  Technology-mediated learning contexts , 2009 .

[8]  Barbara Means,et al.  Teachers' Ability to Use Data to Inform Instruction: Challenges and Supports. , 2011 .

[9]  Edith S. Gummer,et al.  A Systemic View of Implementing Data Literacy in Educator Preparation , 2013 .

[10]  Kenneth Leithwood,et al.  What We Know about Successful School Leadership , 2003 .

[11]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[12]  James P. Spillane Distributed Leadership , 2005 .

[13]  Doug Clow,et al.  The learning analytics cycle: closing the loop effectively , 2012, LAK.

[14]  S. Wineburg,et al.  Toward a Theory of Teacher Community. , 2001 .

[15]  Teacher learning communities and educational change in Scotland: the Highland experience , 2011 .

[16]  Kristin Redington Bennett,et al.  Teaching Formative Assessment Strategies to Preservice Teachers , 2009 .

[17]  Marek Hatala,et al.  A qualitative evaluation of evolution of a learning analytics tool , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Rebecca Ferguson,et al.  Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges , 2012 .

[19]  Friedrich Scheuermann,et al.  Assessing the effects of ICT in education , 2010 .

[20]  Brenda Bannan-Ritland Teacher Design Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Teachers’ Professional Development , 2014 .

[21]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  Capturing and assessing evidence of student teacher inquiry: A case study , 2008 .

[22]  A. Harris Distributed Leadership in Schools: Leading or misleading? , 2003 .

[23]  T. Nelson,et al.  Supported Teacher Collaborative Inquiry. , 2008 .

[24]  Judy Kay,et al.  Student Models that Invite the Learner In: The SMILI: () Open Learner Modelling Framework , 2007, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[25]  R. Schroeder,et al.  Accountability Policies and Teacher Decision Making: Barriers to the Use of Data to Improve Practice. , 2004 .