Chapter 9 A step by step approach to research on time-to-contact and time-to-passage

Abstract We discuss the following three-step approach to testing the hypothesis that a given task of collision avoidance or achievement is carried out by predicting the location of the approaching object at some time in the future: (1) Derive theoretical equations that embody candidate hypothesis; (2) find whether the human visual system contains a mechanism that processes the designated retinal image variable independently of other retinal image variables; (3) carry out field studies to find whether individuals base performance on the designated retinal image variable when performing the task in question. We review equations that relate monocular and binocular retinal information to the direction of an object's motion in three-dimensional space and to its time to collision or passage. We discuss a psychophysical technique for finding whether the human visual system is selectively sensitive to the information in question and can unconfound co-varying retinal image variables. We present a quantitative psychophysical model of the early processing of changing-size, changing-disparity, motion in depth and time-to-contact (TTC) that takes dynamic characteristics into account and that accounts for a wide range of psychophysical data including the common case of an object whose retinal image changes shape as the object grows closer to the observing eye.

[1]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  An organizing principle for cerebral function : the unit module and the distributed system , 1978 .

[2]  D Regan.  Spatial orientation in aviation: visual contributions. , 1995, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[3]  D Regan,et al.  Device for measuring the precision of eye-hand coordination while tracking changing size. , 1980, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[4]  H. M. Schey.  Div, grad, curl, and all that , 1973 .

[5]  Simon K. Rushton,et al.  Weighted combination of size and disparity: a computational model for timing a ball catch , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  D. Regan,et al.  Dissociation of discrimination thresholds for time to contact and for rate of angular expansion , 1993, Vision Research.

[7]  Daniel Mestre,et al.  Catching balls: How to get the hand to the right place at the right time. , 1994 .

[8]  D Regan,et al.  The relation between discrimination and sensitivity in the perception of motion in depth. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual processing of looming and time to contact throughout the visual field , 1995, Vision Research.

[10]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[11]  D. Regan,et al.  Simulated self-motion alters perceived time to collision , 2000, Current Biology.

[12]  Fred Sir Hoyle,et al.  The Black Cloud , 1957 .

[13]  C. Woody.  Characterization of an adaptive filter for the analysis of variable latency neuroelectric signals , 1967, Medical and biological engineering.

[14]  D Regan,et al.  Visual test results compared with flying performance in telemetry-tracked aircraft. , 1983, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[15]  D. Regan,et al.  Cyclopean Discrimination Thresholds for the Direction and Speed of Motion in Depth , 1996, Vision Research.

[16]  Charles Wheatstone,et al.  Contributions to the Physiology of Vision. , 1837 .

[17]  Julie M. Harris,et al.  Speed discrimination of motion-in-depth using binocular cues , 1995, Vision Research.

[18]  D. Regan,et al.  Necessary conditions for the perception of motion in depth. , 1986, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual processing of four kinds of relative motion , 1986, Vision Research.

[20]  Dave Regan,et al.  Human perception of objects: early visual processing of spatial form defined by luminance , 2000 .

[21]  D Regan,et al.  Adaptation to Incomplete Flow Patterns: No Evidence for ‘Filling-In’ the Perception of Flow Patterns , 1982, Perception.

[22]  G. J. K. Alderson,et al.  An operational analysis of a one-handed catching task using high speed photography. , 1974, Journal of motor behavior.

[23]  D. Regan,et al.  Evidence for the existence of neural mechanisms selectively sensitive to the direction of movement in space , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  John P. Wann,et al.  Anticipating arrival: is the tau margin a specious theory? , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  D Regan,et al.  Visual responses to changing size and to sideways motion for different directions of motion in depth: linearization of visual responses. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[26]  D. Regan,et al.  Just-noticeable difference in the speed of cyclopean motion in depth and the speed of cyclopean motion within a frontoparallel plane. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Andrew T. Smith,et al.  Visual detection of motion , 1994 .

[28]  D. Regan,et al.  Separable aftereffects of changing-size and motion-in-depth: Different neural mechanisms? , 1979, Vision Research.

[29]  D. Regan.  A hypothesis-based approach to clinical psychophysics and to the design of visual tests: the Proctor Lecture. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[30]  D. Regan,et al.  Binocular correlates of the direction of motion in depth , 1993, Vision Research.

[31]  D. Regan,et al.  Fast long-range interactions in the early processing of luminance-defined form , 2002, Vision Research.

[32]  D. Regan,et al.  Illusory motion in depth: Aftereffect of adaptation to changing size , 1978, Vision Research.

[33]  C. A. Desoer,et al.  Nonlinear Systems Analysis , 1978 .

[34]  A J Ahumada,et al.  Model of human visual-motion sensing. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[35]  D Regan,et al.  Do Monocular Time-to-Collision Estimates Necessarily Involve Perceived Distance? , 1999, Perception.

[36]  D. Regan,et al.  Estimating the time to collision with a rotating nonspherical object , 2000, Vision Research.

[37]  D. Regan,et al.  Judging the time to collision with a simulated textured object: Effect of mismatching rate of expansion of object size and of texture element size , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  C. Wheatstone.  XVIII. Contributions to the physiology of vision. —Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision , 1962, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[39]  D Regan,et al.  Correlations between visual test results and flying performance on the advanced simulator for pilot training (ASPT). , 1981, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[40]  Bruce Abernethy,et al.  Visual information for the timing of skilled movements: A review , 1992 .

[41]  G. Poggio,et al.  Mechanisms of static and dynamic stereopsis in foveal cortex of the rhesus monkey , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[42]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[43]  D Regan,et al.  Visual factors in hitting and catching. , 1997, Journal of sports sciences.

[44]  J. Summers.  Approaches to the study of motor control and learning , 1992 .

[45]  M. Cynader,et al.  Neurones in cat parastriate cortex sensitive to the direction of motion in three‐dimensional space , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[46]  H Spekreijse,et al.  Flicker responses in monkey lateral geniculate nucleus and human perception of flicker. , 1971, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  D Regan,et al.  Visually guided locomotion: psychophysical evidence for a neural mechanism sensitive to flow patterns. , 1979, Science.

[48]  D. Regan,et al.  Neurons in cat visual cortex tuned to the direction of motion in depth: Effect of positional disparity , 1982, Vision Research.

[49]  Henri Poincaré,et al.  The Value of Science , 1905 .

[50]  D. Regan,et al.  Texture changes versus size changes as stimuli for motion in depth , 1983, Vision Research.

[51]  D. Regan.  Visual information channeling in normal and disordered vision. , 1982, Psychological review.

[52]  D. Regan,et al.  Monocular discrimination of the direction of motion in depth , 1994, Vision Research.

[53]  J. van Santen,et al.  Elaborated Reichardt detectors. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[54]  D Regan,et al.  Discrimination of the direction and speed of motion in depth of a monocularly visible target from binocular information alone. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  N. Graham.  Visual Pattern Analyzers , 1989 .

[56]  Reinoud J. Bootsma,et al.  Predictive information and the control of action: What you see is what you get. , 1991 .

[57]  D Regan,et al.  Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information , 1998, Vision Research.

[58]  G. Mather.  Motion detector models: psychophysical evidence , 1994 .

[59]  D Regan,et al.  Visual Judgements and Misjudgements in Cricket, and the Art of Flight , 1992, Perception.

[60]  M. Cynader,et al.  Neurons in cat visual cortex tuned to the direction of motion in depth: effect of stimulus speed. , 1982, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[61]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[62]  D Regan,et al.  Binocular information about time to collision and time to passage , 2002, Vision Research.

[63]  David J. Heeger,et al.  Model of visual motion sensing , 1994 .

[64]  D Regan,et al.  A stereo field map with implications for disparity processing. , 1973, Investigative ophthalmology.

[65]  Motion sensitivity measured by a psychophysical linearizing technique. , 1981, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[66]  D. Regan,et al.  Human brain electrophysiology , 1989 .

[67]  D Regan,et al.  Motion in depth: Adequate and inadequate simulation , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[68]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual perception of changing size: The effect of object size , 1979, Vision Research.

[69]  D Regan,et al.  Some dynamic features of depth perception. , 1973, Vision research.

[70]  C D Woody,et al.  Use of an adaptive filter to characterize signal-noise relationships. , 1969, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[71]  D Regan,et al.  Visual Sensitivity to the Shape and Size of a Moving Object: Implications for Models of Object Perception , 1980, Perception.

[72]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Dynamic theory of action-perception patterns: The time-before-contact paradigm , 1994 .

[73]  R. Kruk,et al.  Flying Performance on the Advanced Simulator for Pilot Training and Laboratory Tests of Vision , 1983, Human factors.

[74]  D Regan,et al.  Adapting to expansion increases perceived time-to-collision , 1999, Vision Research.

[75]  F. G. Worden,et al.  The neurosciences : fourth study program , 1979 .

[76]  D. Regan,et al.  Long–distance interactions in Cyclopean vision , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[77]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system , 1961 .

[78]  D. Regan,et al.  Looming detectors in the human visual pathway , 1978, Vision Research.

[79]  D. Regan,et al.  Binocular and monocular stimuli for motion in depth: Changing-disparity and changing-size feed the same motion-in-depth stage , 1979, Vision Research.

[80]  D Regan,et al.  Visual field defects for vergence eye movements and for stereomotion perception. , 1986, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[81]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual field defects for unidirectional and oscillatory motion in depth , 1989, Vision Research.

[82]  M. Cynader,et al.  The visual perception of motion in depth. , 1979, Scientific American.

[83]  Yiannis Aloimonos,et al.  Vision and action , 1995, Image Vis. Comput..

[84]  G A Orban,et al.  Selectivity of cat area 18 neurons for direction and speed in depth. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.