L2 Negation Constructions at Work

This article explores the usage- and exemplar-based roots of second language (L2) negation construction learning. Based on two longitudinal case studies involving two adult L2 English learners and a corpus of 63 three-hour sessions of recorded classroom interactions, the study shows that L2 learning follows the predictions of usage-based models of language knowledge and acquisition, as the two participants’ learning of English negation constructions is found to go from recurring expressions toward an increasingly schematic, dynamic inventory of linguistic resources. Furthermore, exploring the evolution of two negation patterns in ongoing discourse, I suggest that local usage and long-term learning are inseparable and call for further detailed investigations of how locally contextualized interactions influence L2 development.

[1]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Two-year-old children's production of multiword utterances: A usage-based analysis , 2009 .

[2]  Elaine Tarone,et al.  Exploring Learner Language , 2009 .

[3]  N. Ellis,et al.  Constructing a Second Language: Introduction to the Special Section , 2009 .

[4]  Diane Larsen-Freeman,et al.  Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage. , 2009 .

[5]  Robert Berdan.  Disentangling Language Acquisition from Language Variation , 1996 .

[6]  M. Tomasello.  First Steps toward a Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition , 2001 .

[7]  D. Larsen-Freeman.  The Emergence of Complexity, Fluency, and Accuracy in the Oral and Written Production of Five Chinese Learners of English , 2006 .

[8]  Kris Heylen,et al.  Usage-based approaches in Cognitive Linguistics: A technical state of the art , 2005 .

[9]  D. Larsen-Freeman.  Second Language Acquisition Research: Staking Out the Territory , 1991 .

[10]  D. Bolinger.  Meaning and Memory , 1979 .

[11]  Renee Waara,et al.  Construal, Convention, and Constructions in L2 Speech , 2004 .

[12]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  CONSTRUCTION LEARNING AND SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 2008 .

[13]  Diane Larsen-Freeman.  Chapter 10. Second Language Acquisition and the Issue of Fossilization: There Is No End, and There Is No State , 2005 .

[14]  Catherine J. Doughty,et al.  Instructed SLA: Constraints, Compensation, and Enhancement , 2008 .

[15]  Thorn Huebner,et al.  SYSTEM AND VARIABILITY IN INTERLANGUAGE SYNTAX , 1985 .

[16]  Søren Wind Eskildsen,et al.  Constructing another Language—Usage-Based Linguistics in Second Language Acquisition , 2009 .

[17]  B. Hammarberg,et al.  The functions of a high-frequency collocation in native and learner discourse: The case of French c'est and Swedish det är , 2007 .

[18]  Rod Ellis,et al.  The Study of Second Language Acquisition , 1994 .

[19]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Language Is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper , 2009 .

[20]  Anita M. Pomerantz.  Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes , 1984 .

[21]  S. Gries,et al.  Do foreign language learners also have constructions , 2005 .

[22]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Construction Learning as a Function of Frequency, Frequency Distribution, and Function. , 2009 .

[23]  Michael H. Long,et al.  The handbook of second language acquisition , 2003 .

[24]  S. Farram.  Staking Out The Territory , 2011 .

[25]  J. Lantolf,et al.  Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development , 2006 .

[26]  Wander Lowie,et al.  A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition , 2007, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[27]  Ann M. Peters,et al.  The Units of Language Acquisition , 1983 .

[28]  Stephen Reder,et al.  The Multimedia Adult ESL Learner Corpus , 2003 .

[29]  Kenneth Hyltenstam.  IMPLICATIONAL PATTERNS IN INTERLANGUAGE SYNTAX VARIATION , 1977 .

[30]  J. Schumann.  SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: THE PIDGINIZATION HYPOTHESIS , 1976 .

[31]  J. Hellermann,et al.  Practices for Social Interaction in the Language-Learning Classroom: Disengagements from Dyadic Task Interaction , 2009 .

[32]  Wander Lowie,et al.  A Dynamic Approach to Second Language Development. Methods and Techniques. , 2011 .

[33]  Philip Herdina,et al.  A Dynamic Model of Multilingualism: Perspectives of Change in Psycholinguistics. Multilingual Matters 121. , 2002 .

[34]  R. Weinert.  The Role of Formulaic Language in Second Language Acquisition: A Review , 1995 .

[35]  Ann-Marie E. Stauble.  The Process of Decreolization: A Model for Second Language Development. , 1978 .

[36]  Jürgen M. Meisel,et al.  On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition , 1981, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[37]  William Croft,et al.  Cognitive Linguistics , 2004 .

[38]  M. Tomasello.  First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development , 1994 .

[39]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  Pragmatic Patterns in Child Syntax , 1975 .

[40]  James R. Nattinger,et al.  Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching , 1992 .

[41]  J. Dean Mellow,et al.  The Emergence of Second Language Syntax: A Case Study of the Acquisition of Relative Clauses , 2006 .

[42]  Ewa Dąbrowska,et al.  Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions , 2005 .

[43]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN LANGUAGE PROCESSING , 2002, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[44]  R. Young,et al.  Variation and the Interlanguage Hypothesis , 1988, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.