Sustainability assessment of flooring systems in the city of Tehran: An AHP-based life cycle analysis

Abstract In recent years, numerous attempts have been made to reduce the global environmental and associated socio-economic impacts of construction activities to achieve sustainable development goals. A sustainable system or activity refers to an eco-friendly, cost effective and socio-politically viable solution. This paper utilizes triple-bottom-line (TBL) sustainability criteria for the selection of a sustainable flooring system in Tehran (Iran). Three types of block joisted flooring systems – concrete, clay, and expanded polystyrene (EPS) blocks – have been investigated using life cycle analysis (LCA). Proposed approach provides a comprehensive evaluation system based on TBL criteria that are further divided into thirteen sub-criteria. It includes: (1) Environmental concerns (resource depletion, waste and emissions, waste management, climate change, environmental risk, embodied energy and energy loss); (2) Economic concerns (material cost, construction cost, and occupation and maintenance cost); and (3) Socio-political issues (social acceptance, vulnerability of area, and building weight). Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is used as a multi-criteria decision making technique that helps to aggregate the impacts of proposed (sub)criteria into a sustainability index (SI) through a five-level hierarchical structure. Integration of AHP and LCA provides a framework for robust decision making that is consistent with sustainable construction practices. A detailed analysis shows that the EPS block is the most sustainable solution for block joisted flooring system in Tehran.

[1]  H. Althaus,et al.  Benchmarks for sustainable construction: A contribution to develop a standard , 2005 .

[2]  Grace K C Ding,et al.  Sustainable construction--the role of environmental assessment tools. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  Fatemeh Zahedi,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process—A Survey of the Method and its Applications , 1986 .

[4]  R. Vachnadze,et al.  Some applications of the analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[5]  C. Hwang Multiple Objective Decision Making - Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1979 .

[6]  David Malin Roodman,et al.  Our Buildings, Ourselves. , 1994 .

[7]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  The Role of SETAC in the Development of LCA , 2006 .

[8]  S. Ryding ISO 14042 Environmental management • Life cycle assessment • life cycle impact assessment , 1999 .

[9]  Bjørn Berge,et al.  The Ecology of Building Materials , 2000 .

[10]  Oscar Ortiz,et al.  Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA , 2009 .

[11]  James A. Fava,et al.  Will the Next 10 Years be as Productive in Advancing Life Cycle Approaches as the Last 15 Years? , 2006 .

[12]  Juan Pablo Stegmann Strategic Planning and Control , 2011 .

[13]  Tahir Husain,et al.  GreenPro-I: a risk-based life cycle assessment and decision-making methodology for process plant design , 2002, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  K G Willis,et al.  THE IMPACTS OF EARTHQUAKE RISK ON THE HOUSING MARKET: EVIDENCE FROM TEHRAN REAL ESTATE AGENTS , 1997 .

[15]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP) , 2006 .

[16]  Jesús Cuadrado Rojo,et al.  Industrial building design stage based on a system approach to their environmental sustainability , 2010 .

[17]  R. Sadiq,et al.  Evaluation of Generic Types of Drilling Fluid Using a Risk-Based Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2003, Environmental management.

[18]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  Using penalty functions to evaluate aggregation models for environmental indices. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[19]  Antonino Risitano,et al.  Materials selection in the Life-Cycle Design process: a method to integrate mechanical and environmental performances in optimal choice , 2005 .

[20]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2012 .

[21]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  That is not the analytic hierarchy process: what the AHP is and what it is not , 1997 .

[22]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  How to Make A Decision , 2012 .

[23]  J. M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard,et al.  Environmental impacts of fat blends , 1995 .

[24]  Brian Veitch,et al.  Life cycle iNdeX (LInX): a new indexing procedure for process and product design and decision-making , 2004 .

[25]  Ernest H. Forman,et al.  Multi Criteria Decision Making and the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[26]  Prasanta Kumar Dey,et al.  An integrated assessment model for cross-country pipelines , 2002 .

[27]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[28]  Bijan Farhanieh,et al.  Simulation of energy saving in Iranian buildings using integrative modelling for insulation , 2006 .

[29]  Chiel Boonstra,et al.  Handbook of Sustainable Building: An Environmental Preference Method for Selection of Materials for Use in Construction and Refurbishment , 1996 .

[30]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  Drilling waste discharges in the marine environment : a risk based decision methodology , 2001 .

[31]  Ashley Muse,et al.  An Inside Look at LEED: Experienced Practitioners Reveal the Inner Workings of LEED , 2006 .

[32]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[33]  Faisal Khan,et al.  GreenPro: a new methodology for cleaner and greener process design , 2001 .

[34]  S. Tesfamariam,et al.  Developing environmental indices using fuzzy numbers ordered weighted averaging (FN-OWA) operators , 2008 .

[35]  Faisal I. Khan,et al.  An integrated approach for risk-based life cycle assessment and multi-criteria decision-making: Selection, design and evaluation of cleaner and greener processes , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[36]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  Emergy analysis of building manufacturing, maintenance and use: Em-building indices to evaluate housing sustainability , 2007 .

[37]  Douglas John Harris,et al.  A quantitative approach to the assessment of the environmental impact of building materials , 1999 .

[38]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Life cycle Assessment and its Application to Process Selection, Design and Optimisation , 1999 .

[39]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  The effect of material choice on the total energy need and recycling potential of a building , 2006 .

[40]  B. V. Venkatarama Reddy,et al.  Embodied energy of common and alternative building materials and technologies , 2003 .