Cognitive enhancement with Salience Network electrical stimulation is influenced by network structural connectivity

&NA; The Salience Network (SN) and its interactions are important for cognitive control. We have previously shown that structural damage to the SN is associated with abnormal functional connectivity between the SN and Default Mode Network (DMN), abnormal DMN deactivation, and impaired response inhibition, which is an important aspect of cognitive control. This suggests that stimulating the SN might enhance cognitive control. Here, we tested whether non‐invasive transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) could be used to modulate activity within the SN and enhance cognitive control. TDCS was applied to the right inferior frontal gyrus/anterior insula cortex during performance of the Stop Signal Task (SST) and concurrent functional (f)MRI. Anodal TDCS improved response inhibition. Furthermore, stratification of participants based on SN structural connectivity showed that it was an important influence on both behavioural and physiological responses to anodal TDCS. Participants with high fractional anisotropy within the SN showed improved SST performance and increased activation of the SN with anodal TDCS, whilst those with low fractional anisotropy within the SN did not. Cathodal stimulation of the SN produced activation of the right caudate, an effect which was not modulated by SN structural connectivity. Our results show that stimulation targeted to the SN can improve response inhibition, supporting the causal influence of this network on cognitive control and confirming it as a target to produce cognitive enhancement. Our results also highlight the importance of structural connectivity as a modulator of network to TDCS, which should guide the design and interpretation of future stimulation studies.

[1]  R. Constable,et al.  Imaging Response Inhibition in a Stop-Signal Task: Neural Correlates Independent of Signal Monitoring and Post-Response Processing , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  G. Glover,et al.  Dissociable Intrinsic Connectivity Networks for Salience Processing and Executive Control , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Ludovica Griffanti,et al.  Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: Combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers , 2014, NeuroImage.

[4]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Electric field calculations in brain stimulation based on finite elements: An optimized processing pipeline for the generation and usage of accurate individual head models , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[5]  Michel Thiebaut de Schotten,et al.  Short frontal lobe connections of the human brain , 2012, Cortex.

[6]  R. Parasuraman,et al.  Simultaneous tDCS-fMRI Identifies Resting State Networks Correlated with Visual Search Enhancement , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[7]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  How Preparation Changes the Need for Top–Down Control of the Basal Ganglia When Inhibiting Premature Actions , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  A. Thomson,et al.  Comparison of responses to transmitter candidates at an N-methylaspartate receptor mediated synapse, in slices of rat cerebral cortex , 1986, Neuroscience.

[9]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[11]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[12]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[13]  M. Bikson,et al.  Role of cortical cell type and morphology in subthreshold and suprathreshold uniform electric field stimulation in vitro , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[14]  Patrick R Hof,et al.  FEATURE ARTICLE Distinctive Neurons of the Anterior Cingulate and Frontoinsular Cortex: A Historical Perspective , 2012 .

[15]  Heidi Johansen-Berg,et al.  Polarity-specific effects of motor transcranial direct current stimulation on fMRI resting state networks☆ , 2014, NeuroImage.

[16]  O Sporns,et al.  Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  M. Koslowsky,et al.  tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Robert Leech,et al.  Externally induced frontoparietal synchronization modulates network dynamics and enhances working memory performance , 2017, eLife.

[19]  Nicola Filippini,et al.  Structural Connectivity Variances Underlie Functional and Behavioral Changes During Pain Relief Induced by Neuromodulation , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[20]  Tae-Seong Kim,et al.  Investigation of the electric field components of tDCS via anisotropically conductive gyri-specific finite element head models , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[21]  Bradford C. Dickerson,et al.  Dissociable large-scale networks anchored in the right anterior insula subserve affective experience and attention , 2012, NeuroImage.

[22]  J. Rothwell,et al.  A fronto–striato–subthalamic–pallidal network for goal-directed and habitual inhibition , 2015, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[23]  Paul A. Yushkevich,et al.  Deformable registration of diffusion tensor MR images with explicit orientation optimization , 2006, Medical Image Anal..

[24]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Modulating functional connectivity patterns and topological functional organization of the human brain with transcranial direct current stimulation , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[25]  Peng Wen,et al.  Numerical investigation of white matter anisotropic conductivity in defining current distribution under tDCS , 2013, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[26]  Marom Bikson,et al.  Axon terminal polarization induced by weak uniform DC electric fields: A modeling study , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[27]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Reorganizing the Intrinsic Functional Architecture of the Human Primary Motor Cortex during Rest with Non-Invasive Cortical Stimulation , 2012, PloS one.

[28]  L. Parra,et al.  Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Modulation of large-scale brain networks by transcranial direct current stimulation evidenced by resting-state functional MRI , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[30]  Steen Moeller,et al.  ICA-based artefact removal and accelerated fMRI acquisition for improved resting state network imaging , 2014, NeuroImage.

[31]  V. Menon,et al.  Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function , 2010, Brain Structure and Function.

[32]  Shirley Fecteau,et al.  Online Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Real Time on Human Prefrontal and Striatal Metabolites , 2016, Biological Psychiatry.

[33]  S. Meunier,et al.  Connectivity between Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus and Supplementary Motor Area Predicts After-Effects of Right Frontal Cathodal tDCS on Picture Naming Speed , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[34]  D. Purpura,et al.  INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  Stephen E. Jones,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Targeting Primary Motor Versus Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortices: Proof-of-Concept Study Investigating Functional Connectivity of Thalamocortical Networks Specific to Sensory-Affective Information Processing , 2017, Brain Connectivity.

[36]  Heidi Johansen-Berg,et al.  Individual Differences in White-Matter Microstructure Reflect Variation in Functional Connectivity during Choice , 2007, Current Biology.

[37]  D. Sharp,et al.  Contrasting network and modular perspectives on inhibitory control , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  Soyoung Q. Park,et al.  Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences the Von Economo Neurons in the Frontoinsular and Anterior Cingulate Cortex , 2022 .

[39]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex during fMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[40]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Engagement of large-scale networks is related to individual differences in inhibitory control , 2010, NeuroImage.

[41]  Peng Wen,et al.  Assessment of electric field distribution in anisotropic cortical and subcortical regions under the influence of tDCS , 2014, Bioelectromagnetics.

[42]  M. Bikson,et al.  Neuromodulation of Axon Terminals , 2018, Cerebral cortex.

[43]  Robert Leech,et al.  Damage to the Salience Network and Interactions with the Default Mode Network , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Contribution of axonal orientation to pathway-dependent modulation of excitatory transmission by direct current stimulation in isolated rat hippocampus. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[46]  Robert Leech,et al.  Salience network integrity predicts default mode network function after traumatic brain injury , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Chang-hyun Park,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation increases resting state interhemispheric connectivity , 2013, Neuroscience Letters.

[48]  C. Economo,et al.  Eine neue art spezialzellen des lobus cinguli und lobus insulae , 1926 .

[49]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation , 2015, NeuroImage.

[50]  G. Winston.  The physical and biological basis of quantitative parameters derived from diffusion MRI. , 2012, Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery.

[51]  Maneesh C. Patel,et al.  Distinct frontal systems for response inhibition, attentional capture, and error processing , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Modulating cortico‐striatal and thalamo‐cortical functional connectivity with transcranial direct current stimulation , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[53]  Andreas Horn,et al.  The structural–functional connectome and the default mode network of the human brain , 2014, NeuroImage.

[54]  Takashi Hanakawa,et al.  Lateralization of activity in the parietal cortex predicts the effectiveness of bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation on performance of a mental calculation task , 2013, Neuroscience Letters.

[55]  Kristina M. Visscher,et al.  The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[56]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Physiological Basis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2011, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[57]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Cortical and Subcortical Contributions to Stop Signal Response Inhibition: Role of the Subthalamic Nucleus , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[58]  Axel Thielscher,et al.  Field modeling for transcranial magnetic stimulation: A useful tool to understand the physiological effects of TMS? , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[59]  John Duncan,et al.  The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control , 2010, NeuroImage.

[60]  Arno Villringer,et al.  A Comparison between Uni- and Bilateral tDCS Effects on Functional Connectivity of the Human Motor Cortex , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[61]  O. Carter,et al.  Quantitative Review Finds No Evidence of Cognitive Effects in Healthy Populations From Single-session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[62]  Lucia M. Li,et al.  The contribution of interindividual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studies , 2015, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[63]  V. Menon,et al.  A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  Kristina M. Visscher,et al.  A Core System for the Implementation of Task Sets , 2006, Neuron.

[65]  W. Byblow,et al.  Contralesional hemisphere control of the proximal paretic upper limb following stroke. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[66]  Arno Villringer,et al.  Dynamic modulation of intrinsic functional connectivity by transcranial direct current stimulation. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[67]  O. Carter,et al.  Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: A systematic review , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[68]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.