Stability and convergence of the level set method in computer vision

Several computer vision problems, like segmentation, tracking and shape modeling, are increasingly being solved using level set methodologies. But the critical issues of stability and convergence have always been neglected in most of the level set implementations. This often leads to either complete breakdown or premature/delayed termination of the curve evolution process, resulting in unsatisfactory results. We present a generic convergence criterion and also a means of determining the optimal time-step involved in the numerical solution of the level set equation. The significant improvement in the performance of level set algorithms, as a result of the proposed changes, is demonstrated using object tracking and shape-contour extraction results.

[1]  J. Sethian,et al.  A Fast Level Set Method for Propagating Interfaces , 1995 .

[2]  Rachid Deriche,et al.  Geodesic Active Contours and Level Sets for the Detection and Tracking of Moving Objects , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  Janusz Konrad,et al.  Multiple motion segmentation with level sets , 2003, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[4]  Baba C. Vemuri,et al.  Shape Modeling with Front Propagation: A Level Set Approach , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Abdol-Reza Mansouri,et al.  Region Tracking via Level Set PDEs without Motion Computation , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[6]  J. Sethian,et al.  Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations , 1988 .

[7]  Jun-Wei Hsieh,et al.  Tracking Multiple Moving Objects Using A Level-Set Method , 2004, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[8]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Snakes: Active contour models , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.