Nonstationary sparsity-constrained seismic deconvolution

The Robinson convolution model is mainly restricted by three inappropriate assumptions, i.e., statistically white reflectivity, minimum-phase wavelet, and stationarity. Modern reflectivity inversion methods (e.g., sparsity-constrained deconvolution) generally attempt to suppress the problems associated with the first two assumptions but often ignore that seismic traces are nonstationary signals, which undermines the basic assumption of unchanging wavelet in reflectivity inversion. Through tests on reflectivity series, we confirm the effects of nonstationarity on reflectivity estimation and the loss of significant information, especially in deep layers. To overcome the problems caused by nonstationarity, we propose a nonstationary convolutional model, and then use the attenuation curve in log spectra to detect and correct the influences of nonstationarity. We use Gabor deconvolution to handle nonstationarity and sparsity-constrained deconvolution to separating reflectivity and wavelet. The combination of the two deconvolution methods effectively handles nonstationarity and greatly reduces the problems associated with the unreasonable assumptions regarding reflectivity and wavelet. Using marine seismic data, we show that correcting nonstationarity helps recover subtle reflectivity information and enhances the characterization of details with respect to the geological record.

[1]  R. Wiggins Minimum entropy deconvolution , 1978 .

[2]  G. Lazear Mixed-phase wavelet estimation using fourth-order cumulants , 1993 .

[3]  N. Hargreaves,et al.  Inverse Q filtering by Fourier transform , 1991 .

[4]  D. Velis Stochastic sparse-spike deconvolution , 2008 .

[5]  Tadeusz J. Ulrych,et al.  Processing via spectral modeling , 1991 .

[6]  Douglas W. Oldenburg,et al.  Automatic phase correction of common-midpoint stacked data , 1987 .

[7]  A. T. Walden,et al.  The nature of the non-Gaussianity of primary reflection coefficients and its significance for deconvolution , 1986 .

[8]  A. Walden,et al.  PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATION OF MAXIMUM KURTOSIS PHASE ESTIMATION1 , 1988 .

[9]  Yanghua Wang,et al.  Inverse Q-filter for seismic resolution enhancement , 2006 .

[10]  Sam Z. Sun,et al.  The application of amplitude-preserved processing and migration for carbonate reservoir prediction in the Tarim Basin, China , 2011 .

[11]  L. J. Griffiths,et al.  Adaptive deconvolution; a new technique for processing time-varying seismic data , 1977 .

[12]  Guy Canadas,et al.  A Mathematical Framework For Blind Deconvolution Inverse Problems , 2002 .

[13]  D. Dondurur An Approximation to Sparse-Spike Reflectivity Using the Gold Deconvolution Method , 2010 .

[14]  A. Guitton Amplitude and kinematic corrections of migrated images for nonunitary imaging operators , 2004 .

[15]  N. A. Anstey,et al.  Reflections on AMPLITUDES , 1971 .

[16]  Einar Kjartansson,et al.  Constant Q-wave propagation and attenuation , 1979 .

[17]  M. Turhan Taner,et al.  The use of the conjugate-gradient algorithm in the computation of predictive deconvolution operators , 1985 .

[18]  David C. Henley,et al.  Gabor deconvolution: Estimating reflectivity by nonstationary deconvolution of seismic data , 2011 .

[19]  G. Margrave,et al.  Phase correction in Gabor deconvolution , 2005 .

[20]  William Curry Interpolation of Irregularly-sampled Data With Non-stationary, Multi-scale Prediction-error Filters , 2003 .

[21]  Gary F. Margrave,et al.  Theory of nonstationary linear filtering in the Fourier domain with application to time‐variant filtering , 1998 .

[22]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  Reweighting strategies in seismic deconvolution , 1997 .

[23]  Xuekai Sun,et al.  Gabor Deconvolution: Hyperbolic Smoothing in Logarithmic Magnitude Spectrum , 2012 .

[24]  David C. Henley,et al.  Gabor Deconvolution Revisited , 2003 .

[25]  G. Margrave,et al.  Gabor deconvolution of seismic data for source waveform and Q correction , 2002 .

[26]  S. Bickel,et al.  Plane-wave Q deconvolution , 1985 .