Effects of noise from functional magnetic resonance imaging on auditory event-related potentials in working memory task

The effects of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) acoustic noise were investigated on the parameters of event-related responses (ERPs) elicited during auditory matching-to-sample location and pitch working memory tasks. Stimuli were tones with varying location (left or right) and frequency (high or low). Subjects were instructed to memorize and compare either the locations or frequencies of the stimuli with each other. Tape-recorded fMRI acoustic noise was presented in half of the experimental blocks. The fMRI noise considerably enhanced the P1 component, reduced the amplitude and increased the latency of the N1, shortened the latency of the N2, and enhanced the amplitude of the P3 in both tasks. The N1 amplitude was higher in the location than pitch task in both noise and no-noise blocks, whereas the task-related N1 latency difference was present in the no-noise blocks only. Although the task-related differences between spatial and nonspatial auditory responses were partially preserved in noise, the finding that the acoustic gradient noise accompanying functional MR imaging modulated the auditory ERPs implies that the noise may confound the results of auditory fMRI experiments especially when studying higher cognitive processing.

[1]  D. Deutsch Tones and Numbers: Specificity of Interference in Immediate Memory , 1970, Science.

[2]  N. Kiang,et al.  Acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Hannu J. Aronen,et al.  Evidence for Dissociation of Spatial and Nonspatial Auditory Information Processing , 2001, NeuroImage.

[4]  R J Ilmoniemi,et al.  Noise affects speech-signal processing differently in the cerebral hemispheres. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[5]  L. Jäncke,et al.  Influence of acoustic masking noise in fMRI of the auditory cortex during phonetic discrimination , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.

[7]  Antti Korvenoja,et al.  Differences between auditory evoked responses recorded during spatial and nonspatial working memory tasks , 2003, NeuroImage.

[8]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[9]  S. Carlson,et al.  Distribution of cortical activation during visuospatial n-back tasks as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  A. Friederici,et al.  Noise affects auditory and linguistic processing differently: an MEG study , 2000, Neuroreport.

[11]  R A Butler,et al.  The cumulative effects of different stimulus repetition rates on the auditory evoked response in man. , 1973, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  T Wüstenberg,et al.  Short-term functional plasticity in the human auditory cortex: an fMRI study. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[13]  R. Bowtell,et al.  The effect of scanner sound in visual, motor, and auditory functional MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  R E Brummett,et al.  Potential hearing loss resulting from MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[15]  P Rämä,et al.  Selective interference reveals dissociation between memory for location and colour. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[16]  S Martinkauppi,et al.  Working memory of auditory localization. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  C. Grady,et al.  “What” and “where” in the human auditory system , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  P Rämä,et al.  Selective interference reveals dissociation between auditory memory for location and pitch. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[19]  Mark S. Cohen,et al.  Localization of brain function using magnetic resonance imaging , 1994, Trends in Neurosciences.

[20]  A. Friederici,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of novelty processing: integrating ERP and fMRI results. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  E. Schröger,et al.  Differential Contribution of Frontal and Temporal Cortices to Auditory Change Detection: fMRI and ERP Results , 2002, NeuroImage.

[22]  Steve C R Williams,et al.  Acoustic noise and functional magnetic resonance imaging: Current strategies and future prospects , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  R. Bowtell,et al.  “sparse” temporal sampling in auditory fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[24]  D. Lim,et al.  Effects of the acoustic noise of the gradient systems on fMRI: A study on auditory, motor, and visual cortices , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  Hannu J. Aronen,et al.  Working Memory of Identification of Emotional Vocal Expressions: An fMRI Study , 2001, NeuroImage.

[26]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Event-Related fMRI of the Auditory Cortex , 1998, NeuroImage.

[27]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Effects of Acoustic Gradient Noise from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Auditory Processing as Reflected by Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2001, NeuroImage.

[28]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Combining electrophysiological and hemodynamic measures of the auditory oddball. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[29]  D. Kurtzberg,et al.  The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on N1 and the mismatch negativity to speech sounds /ba/and/da. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[30]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Mechanisms and streams for processing of "what" and "where" in auditory cortex. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.