Lighting and display screens: Models for predicting luminance limits and disturbance

An investigation of the level of disturbance caused by reflections from a variety of display screens, including interactive whiteboards, has been carried out using three test methods: Luminance adjustment, category rating and reading. The results from the luminance adjustment test and the category rating test were consistent, both showing similar significant effects of lighting-display parameters on the disturbance caused by screen reflections. In contrast, the objective measure of task performance in the reading test was barely responsive to reflections on the screens. Two models have been developed, one to predict the luminaire luminance at which 95% of observers were not disturbed by the reflections and the other to predict the rating of disturbance caused by reflections from the screens. Both models are based on lighting-display parameters including the size and luminance of the reflected light source and the specular reflectance, the effect of haze reflection and the background luminance of the display screen. These models can be used generally, to guide lighting recommendations and, specifically, to identify suitable luminaires to be used with given set of display screens or suitable display screens to be used with a given lighting installation.

[1]  C. J. Lloyd,et al.  A Preliminary Model of Lighting-Display Interaction , 1996 .

[2]  J E Lovie-Kitchin,et al.  Oral and silent reading performance with macular degeneration. , 2000, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[3]  K.-F. Roll,et al.  Energy-effective Direct/Indirect Office and VDU-Lighting Systems: Test and Application , 1987 .

[4]  Edward F. Kelley,et al.  The Three Components of Reflection , 2000 .

[5]  S. Kubota.  Effects of the Reflection Properties of Liquid-Crystal Displays on Subjective Ratings of Disturbing Reflected Glare , 1997 .

[6]  Mark S. Rea,et al.  Toward a Model of Visual Performance: Foundations and Data , 1986 .

[7]  Satoru Kubota,et al.  Permissible Luminance of Disturbing Reflections of Light Source on CRT Displays , 1989 .

[8]  Tharinee Ramasoot.  Investigation of lighting and disturbing reflections on display screens : a new model for judging acceptability , 2010 .

[9]  Peter Boyce,et al.  A Metric for judging Acceptability of Direct Luminaires in Computer Offices , 2001 .

[10]  Mark S. Rea,et al.  Relative visual performance: A basis for application , 1991 .

[11]  I L Bailey,et al.  The Design and Use of a New Near‐Vision Chart , 1980, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[12]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision , 2001, Vision Research.

[13]  Oa Howlett.  Reflectance characteristics of display screen equipment: application to workplace lighting design , 2003 .

[14]  GORDON E. LEGGE,et al.  Psychophysics of Reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low- Vision Reading Test , 1989, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.