The comparison of students’ satisfaction between ubiquitous and web-basedlearning environments

Higher education is moving towards digitalized learning. The rapid development of technological resources, devices and wireless networks enables more flexible opportunities to study and learn in innovative learning environments. New technologies enable combining of authentic and virtual learning spaces and digital resources as multifunctional learning platforms. In the development process it is important to ensure that the quality of environment and the pedagogical suitability are high in relation to the intended learning outcome. The quality of the learning environment can be assessed, for example, from students’ levels of satisfaction. In this study a satisfaction is proposed by following aspects: instruction and feedback, pedagogical and technological methods, perceived enjoyment and self-motivation. The aim of this study was to compare the students’ satisfaction with a ubiquitous learning environment based on 360o–technology and a traditional web-based online learning environment. A comparative, quasi-experimental study design was used. 115 students assigned on clinical histology and histotechnology course and voluntarily to the study, 61 students were assigned to an experimental group and 54 to a control group. The experimental group studied via a 360o–ubiquitous learning environment (ULE) and the control group via a web-based online course (WLE). Satisfaction was assessed at the end of studies by using an instrument developed for this study. The instrument measured aspects affecting the perceived satisfaction by 25 items (Likert 1–5) and 2 open-ended questions. The data was analysed by using the Mann Whitney U-test and with an inductive content analysis. Students in both groups were highly satisfied in the use of the learning environments. Used pedagogical and technological methods were assessed as high. The environments were assessed as easy to use and re-use. Diverse, interesting and clear learning content was seen as highly positive. Statistically significant difference between groups were seen in aspect concerning instruction and feedback. Other significant differences were not seen between groups. Developmental needs were seen in instruction and feedback aspect. More structured course planning, more supportive supervision and technical support were pointed out. The results suggest that ubiquitous learning environments should be used as supportive in histology and histotechnology studies. The results also indicated that the further development and optimisation of the learning environment should be done.

[1]  Ron Owston,et al.  Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[2]  Florence Martin,et al.  Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A key step to understanding paradigm shifts in e-learning: towards context-aware ubiquitous learning , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[4]  J. Arbaugh,et al.  Technological and Structural Characteristics, Student Learning and Satisfaction with Web-Based Courses , 2002 .

[5]  Sang-Gun Lee,et al.  Validating E-learning factors affecting training effectiveness , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[6]  Mark Weiser.  The computer for the 21st century , 1991 .

[7]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students' use of digital technologies , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Babar Zaheer Butt,et al.  A study examining the students satisfaction in higher education , 2010 .

[9]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Emerging business models for mobile brokerage services , 2004, CACM.

[10]  Sanjeeva Srivastava,et al.  Virtual Labs in proteomics: new E-learning tools. , 2012, Journal of proteomics.

[11]  SoHyo-Jeong,et al.  Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment , 2008 .

[12]  Meng-Yen Hsieh,et al.  Using Annotation Services in a Ubiquitous Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Environment , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[13]  Thomas A. Brush,et al.  Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[14]  M. Weiser.  The Computer for the Twenty-First Century , 1991 .

[15]  Dowming Yeh,et al.  What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[16]  D. Dowell,et al.  Teacher communication preferred over peer interaction: Student satisfaction with different tools in a virtual learning environment , 2012 .

[17]  Hiroaki Ogata,et al.  Supporting Classroom Activities with the BSUL System , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[18]  T. Hennig-Thurau,et al.  The impact of customer satisfaction and relationship quality on customer retention: A critical reassessment and model development , 1997 .

[19]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A Context-Aware Mobile Learning System for Supporting Cognitive Apprenticeships in Nursing Skills Training , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[20]  J. Arbaugh.  Virtual Classroom Characteristics and Student Satisfaction with Internet-Based MBA Courses , 2000 .

[21]  J. L. Giese,et al.  Defining Consumer Satisfaction , 2003 .

[22]  Tzyh-Lih Hsia,et al.  A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[23]  R. W. Peterson,et al.  OPTICAL INTERFEROMETRY OF SURFACES , 1991 .

[24]  Laura Varela-Candamio,et al.  E-learning and face to face mixed methodology: Evaluating effectiveness of e-learning and perceived satisfaction for a microeconomic course using the Moodle platform , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[25]  Sean B. Eom,et al.  The Determinants of Students' Perceived Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in University Online Education: An Empirical Investigation* , 2006 .

[26]  Tzu-Chien Liu,et al.  The design and implementation of a meaningful learning-based evaluation method for ubiquitous learning , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[27]  Wenyu Liu,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Critical Factors Affecting Students' Satisfaction in EFL Blended Learning , 2013 .

[28]  Kara L. Orvis,et al.  Learning From Focus Groups: An Examination of Blended Learning , 2002 .

[29]  L. Vygotsky.  Interaction between learning and development , 1978 .

[30]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  Effects of the inquiry-based mobile learning model on the cognitive load and learning achievement of students , 2013, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[31]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  Development of a ubiquitous learning platform based on a real-time help-seeking mechanism , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[32]  Mirna Nachouki,et al.  Evaluating Student Satisfaction with Blended Learning in a Gender-Segregated Environment , 2012, J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res..

[33]  M. P. Iglesias,et al.  A new management element for universities: satisfaction with the offered courses , 2005 .

[34]  Sean B. Eom,et al.  The Determinants of Students’ Perceived Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in University Online Education: An Update* , 2016 .

[35]  Gyu Myoung Lee,et al.  A Context Aware Mobile Learning System with a Cognitive Recommendation Engine , 2016 .

[36]  Christian Gütl,et al.  Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[37]  Hee-Jung Jung.  UBIQUITOUS LEARNING: DETERMINANTS IMPACTING LEARNERS' SATISFACTION AND PERFORMANCE WITH SMARTPHONES , 2014 .

[38]  Tsung-Yu Liu,et al.  A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for language listening and speaking , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[39]  Navleen Kaur.  Educating Students with Special Needs Through Information Communication Technology (ICT) , 2013 .

[40]  B. Mathews,et al.  Customer satisfaction: contrasting academic and consumers’ interpretations , 2001 .

[41]  Ainie Hairianie Aluwi,et al.  Satisfaction on Blended Learning in a Public Higher Education Institution: What Factors Matter? , 2015 .

[42]  Jun Hyung Jo,et al.  Ubiquitous learning environment: An adaptive teaching system using ubiquitous technology , 2004 .

[43]  Zeynep Tatli,et al.  Effect of a Virtual Chemistry Laboratory on Students' Achievement , 2013, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[44]  Erny Arniza Ahmad,et al.  The definition and characteristics of ubiquitous learning : A discussion , 2010 .

[45]  MargaryanAnoush,et al.  Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students' use of digital technologies , 2011 .

[46]  Aytaç Kurtuluş,et al.  The effects of web-based interactive virtual tours on the development of prospective mathematics teachers' spatial skills , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[47]  Clement C. Chen,et al.  Blended-Learning in a Graduate Accounting Course: Student Satisfaction and Course Design Issues , 2008 .

[48]  Hiroaki Ogata,et al.  Knowledge awareness map for computer-supported ubiquitous language-learning , 2004, The 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2004. Proceedings..

[49]  Runzi Gao,et al.  The Virtual Tour , 2012 .

[50]  Hiroaki Ogata,et al.  Supporting classroom activities with the BSUL environment , 2005, IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE'05).

[51]  Shian-Shyong Tseng,et al.  Context-Aware and Ubiquitous Learning (Guest Editorial) , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[52]  Helvi Kyngäs,et al.  The qualitative content analysis process. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[53]  Youmei Liu,et al.  Social Media Tools as a Learning Resource , 2010 .

[54]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A knowledge engineering approach to developing mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[55]  M. Davies.  Using the Apple iPad to facilitate student-led group work and seminar presentation. , 2014, Nurse education in practice.

[56]  Petros Belsis,et al.  Employing Ubiquitous Computing Devices and Technologies in the Higher Education Classroom of the Future , 2013 .

[57]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for conducting complex science experiments , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[58]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  Criteria, Strategies and Research Issues of Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[59]  Thurasamy Ramayah,et al.  System Characteristics, Satisfaction and E-Learning Usage: A Structural Equation Model (SEM) , 2012 .

[60]  Hui-Chun Chu,et al.  Potential Negative Effects of Mobile Learning on Students' Learning Achievement and Cognitive Load - A Format Assessment Perspective , 2014, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[61]  Y. Bastanlar.  User Behaviour in Web-Based Interactive Virtual Tours , 2007, 2007 29th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces.

[62]  Blake Ives,et al.  Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: a Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effectiveness in Basic It Skills Training Author(s): Piccoli Et Al./web-based Virtual Learning Environments Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: a Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effe , 2022 .

[63]  Ken Sakamura,et al.  Ubiquitous computing technologies for ubiquitous learning , 2005, IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE'05).