A rose by any other name is not the same: the role of orthographic knowledge in homophone confusion errors.

Homophone confusion errors were examined in a series of 6 experiments. Across a variety of tasks, readers consistently made more errors on homophone trials than on control trials. These effects were established in Experiment 1 using a semantic-decision task in which participants judged whether pairs of words were related or unrelated. For both related and unrelated trials, error rates were higher for homophones as compared with controls. Results such as these have previously been taken as evidence for the role of phonology in lexical access and reading. However, differences in orthographic knowledge (more specifically, knowledge of spelling-to-meaning correspondences) across participants and homophone items significantly predicted homophone errors across all tasks. In addition, spelling tasks and multiple-choice questionnaires revealed differences in orthographic knowledge across participants and homophone items. Although these results do not rule out a role for phonology in lexical access, they indicate that homophone confusion errors may also be due to factors other than phonology.

[1]  Veronika Coltheart,et al.  When a ROWS is a ROSE: Phonological Effects in Written Word Comprehension , 1994 .

[2]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Phonological Codes Are Automatically Activated During Reading: Evidence From an Eye Movement Priming Paradigm , 1995 .

[3]  Joël Pynte,et al.  Reading as a Perceptual Process , 2000 .

[4]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[5]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  A Pollatsek,et al.  The time course of phonological, semantic, and orthographic coding in reading: Evidence from the fast-priming technique , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  Marilyn Jager Adams,et al.  Beginning To Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. , 1991 .

[8]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking*1 , 1988 .

[9]  K. Fleming.  Phonologically Mediated Priming in Spoken and Printed Word Recognition , 1993 .

[10]  K Rayner,et al.  The role of phonology in the activation of word meanings during reading: evidence from proofreading and eye movements. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  A Pollatsek,et al.  Phonological codes and eye movements in reading. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  E. Reingold,et al.  Do Readers Use Phonological Codes to Activate Word Meanings? Evidence from Eye Movements , 2000 .

[13]  Linnea C. Ehri,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Development of Sight Word Reading and Its Relationship to Recoding , 1992 .

[14]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Reading student essays may be hazardous to your spelling: Effects of reading incorrectly and correctly spelled words. , 1990 .

[15]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Phonemic Stage Not Necessary for Reading , 1973 .

[16]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  G. C. Orden,et al.  Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  J Masterson,et al.  The role of assembled phonology in reading comprehension , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[19]  R. Frost.  Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails. , 1998 .

[20]  James B. Hobbs,et al.  Homophones and Homographs: An American Dictionary , 1986 .

[21]  G. C. Orden.  A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading , 1987 .

[22]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming , 1991 .

[23]  Veronika Coltheart,et al.  Phonological Recoding in Reading for Meaning by Adults and Children , 1988 .

[24]  Eyal M. Reingold,et al.  Time course of phonological activation during reading: Evidence from eye fixations. , 1995 .

[25]  M Coltheart,et al.  Children’s use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning , 1980, Memory & cognition.