Horizontal transfers between adjacent surfaces: forces required using different methods.

OBJECTIVE To describe and compare pull forces required to move supine subjects between adjacent surfaces using different devices and methods. DESIGN Descriptive, correlational, explicatory experiment. SUBJECTS Convenience sample of volunteers. INTERVENTION Alternative transfer devices and methods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Pull forces measured with dynamometers. RESULTS Pull forces associated with transfers with no device, a draw sheet, a Patient Shifter, and an Easy Slide differed significantly (F = 245.1, p < .001), but were correlated significantly (p < .001) with one another (r > .89) and subjects' body weights (r > .82). Pull forces required for transfers with the Easy Slide were lowest. CONCLUSIONS Use of friction-reducing transfer devices significantly decreased the forces required for transferring individuals between adjacent surfaces. The magnitude of this decrease in this study was greatest with the Easy Slide.

[1]  Mary Alice D. Minor,et al.  Patient Care Skills , 1994 .

[2]  R W Bohannon,et al.  Standing balance and function over the course of acute rehabilitation. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  A. Garg,et al.  An ergonomic evaluation of nursing assistants' job in a nursing home. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[4]  C. Granger,et al.  Uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of first admissions for 1996. , 1998, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[5]  D B Chaffin,et al.  A biomechanical analysis of methods used for transferring totally dependent patients. , 1997, SCI nursing : a publication of the American Association of Spinal Cord Injury Nurses.

[6]  J P Zelenka,et al.  Minimal forces to move patients. , 1996, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.