Fleet-Level Modeling of Real World Factors Influencing Greenhouse Gas Emission Simulation in ALPHA

The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Advanced Light-Duty Powertrain and Hybrid Analysis (ALPHA) tool was created to estimate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from light-duty vehicles. ALPHA is a physics-based, forward-looking, full vehicle computer simulation capable of analyzing various vehicle types with different powertrain technologies, showing realistic vehicle behavior, and auditing of internal energy flows in the model. In preparation for the midterm evaluation (MTE) of the 2017-2025 light-duty GHG emissions rule, ALPHA has been updated utilizing newly acquired data from model year 2013-2016 engines and vehicles. Simulations conducted with ALPHA provide data on the effectiveness of various GHG reduction technologies, and reveal synergies that exist between technologies. The ALPHA model has been validated against a variety of vehicles with different powertrain configurations and GHG reduction technologies. This paper will present an overview of the laboratory benchmarking that was done to support validation of the ALPHA model. The paper discusses a variety of real world factors that influence the simulation of fuel economy and GHG emissions that are often overlooked. Updates have been made to the ALPHA model to reflect additional losses such as tire slip and more detailed representations of the electrical system and accessory loads. The characterization of a core set of future technologies is examined, focusing on developing generic calibrations for driver behavior, transmission gear selection and torque converter lockup that are representative across a wide range of vehicles and transmissions. Finally, the paper illustrates how a set of core future technologies can be used to model GHG emissions from future vehicle fleets. CITATION: Dekraker, P., Kargul, J., Moskalik, A., Newman, K. et al., "Fleet-Level Modeling of Real World Factors Influencing Greenhouse Gas Emission Simulation in ALPHA," SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 10(1):2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-0899.

[1]  A. Douaud,et al.  Four-Octane-Number Method for Predicting the Anti-Knock Behavior of Fuels and Engines , 1978 .

[2]  Daniel Barba,et al.  Modeling of a Conventional Mid-Size Car with CVT Using ALPHA and Comparable Powertrain Technologies , 2016 .

[3]  Hans B. Pacejka,et al.  Tyre Modelling for Use in Vehicle Dynamics Studies , 1987 .

[4]  Charles Schenk,et al.  Air Flow Optimization and Calibration in High-Compression-Ratio Naturally Aspirated SI Engines with Cooled-EGR , 2016 .

[5]  Mark Stuhldreher,et al.  Testing and Benchmarking a 2014 GM Silverado 6L80 Six Speed Automatic Transmission , 2017 .

[6]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Internal combustion engine fundamentals , 1988 .

[7]  John Kargul,et al.  Investigating the Effect of Advanced Automatic Transmissions on Fuel Consumption Using Vehicle Testing and Modeling , 2016 .

[8]  John Kargul,et al.  Estimating GHG Reduction from Combinations of Current Best-Available and Future Powertrain and Vehicle Technologies for a Midsized Car Using EPA's ALPHA Model , 2016 .

[9]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a Friction Model for Spark-Ignition Engines , 1989 .

[10]  E. Nam,et al.  Development of Advanced Light-Duty Powertrain and Hybrid Analysis Tool , 2013 .

[11]  Paul Dekraker,et al.  Modeling the Effects of Transmission Gear Count, Ratio Progression, and Final Drive Ratio on Fuel Economy and Performance Using ALPHA , 2016 .

[12]  SoDuk Lee,et al.  Effect of Current and SOC on Round-Trip Energy Efficiency of a Lithium-Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4) Battery Pack , 2015 .

[13]  John B. Heywood,et al.  An Improved Friction Model for Spark-Ignition Engines , 2003 .

[14]  Edward K. Nam,et al.  Modeling and Validation of Power-Split and P2 Parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2013 .

[15]  John Kargul,et al.  Vehicle Component Benchmarking Using a Chassis Dynamometer , 2015 .

[16]  Albert Dick,et al.  Optimization Potential for a State of the Art 8-Speed AT , 2013 .

[17]  J. McDonald,et al.  HIL Development and Validation of Lithium-Ion Battery Packs , 2014 .

[18]  Mark Stuhldreher.  Fuel Efficiency Mapping of a 2014 6-Cylinder GM EcoTec 4.3L Engine with Cylinder Deactivation , 2016 .

[19]  Charles Schenk,et al.  Downsized Boosted Engine Benchmarking and Results , 2015 .

[20]  John Kargul,et al.  Benchmarking and Modeling of a Conventional Mid-Size Car Using ALPHA , 2015 .

[21]  J. M. Novak,et al.  PARAMETRIC SIMULATION OF SIGNIFICANT DESIGN AND OPERATING ALTERNATIVES AFFECTING THE FUEL ECONOMY AND EMISSIONS OF SPARK-IGNITED ENGINES , 1978 .

[22]  SoDuk Lee,et al.  Modeling and Validation of Lithium-Ion Automotive Battery Packs , 2013 .

[23]  John Kargul,et al.  Development and Testing of an Automatic Transmission Shift Schedule Algorithm for Vehicle Simulation , 2015 .

[24]  Charles Schenk,et al.  Benchmarking and Hardware-in-the-Loop Operation of a 2014 MAZDA SkyActiv 2.0L 13:1 Compression Ratio Engine , 2016 .

[25]  John Myers,et al.  Fuel Economy Improvement During Cold Start Using Recycled Exhaust Heat and Electrical Energy for Engine Oil and ATF Warm-Up , 2014 .