Oregon versus Ashcroft: pain relief, physician-assisted suicide, and the Controlled Substances Act.

OBJECTIVE Late in 2001, the State of Oregon filed suit against Attorney General John Ashcroft, seeking to halt his recent directive that physicians who comply with the Oregon Death with Dignity Act by writing a lethal prescription for a controlled substance should be prosecuted for violating the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA). This special article reviews the history of the series of challenges to the Oregon Act since its initial adoption in 1994, with particular consideration of the arguments on both sides of Oregon v. Ashcroft and the disposition of the case by the district court. DESIGN The article utilizes an historical review of the Oregon Act, including legal and political challenges to it, as well as discussion of the 3 years of data on the experience with legalized physician-assisted suicide in Oregon, and analysis of the legal issues in the current litigation. CONCLUSIONS The federal district court concluded that the Attorney General's interpretation of certain provisions of the CSA so as to preclude the writing of a lethal prescription where otherwise permitted by state law as a legitimate medical practice was inconsistent with the CSA and, therefore, beyond the scope of his authority. The Oregon Act will continue in force while the Attorney General's appeal of the district court ruling is considered by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

[1]  E. Emanuel,et al.  Attitudes and desires related to euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide among terminally ill patients and their caregivers. , 2000, JAMA.

[2]  H. Nelson,et al.  Physicians' experiences with the Oregon Death with Dignity Act. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  K. Foley,et al.  The Oregon report. Don't ask, don't tell. , 1999, The Hastings Center report.

[4]  A. Alpers Criminal Act or Palliative Care? Prosecutions Involving the Care of the Dying , 1998, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[5]  R. Burt Disorder in the court: physician-assisted suicide and the Constitution. , 1998, Minnesota law review.

[6]  S. W. Tolle Care of the Dying: Clinical and Financial Lessons from the Oregon Experience , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  富田 清美 Compassion in Dying v.State of Washington,79 F.3d 790(9th Cir.1996)--自殺幇助罪の規定は,医師が処方する薬によって死を早めることを希望する能力ある成年の末期患者に適用されるとき,デュ-・プロセス条項に違反する,とされた事例 , 1998 .

[8]  R. Burt The Supreme Court speaks--not assisted suicide but a constitutional right to palliative care. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  T. Quill The ambiguity of clinical intentions. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  J. P. Morgan,et al.  American opiophobia: customary underutilization of opioid analgesics. , 1985, Advances in alcohol & substance abuse.

[11]  Seth F. Kreimer The second time as tragedy: the assisted suicide cases and the heritage of Roe v. Wade. , 1997, Hastings constitutional law quarterly.