Face perception: domain specific, not process specific.

[1]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The M170 is selective for faces, not for expertise , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  M. Riesenhuber,et al.  Face processing in humans is compatible with a simple shape–based model of vision , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Normal Greeble Learning in a Severe Case of Developmental Prosopagnosia , 2004, Neuron.

[4]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  A unique look at face processing: the impact of masked faces on the processing of facial features , 2004, Cognition.

[6]  D. Maurer,et al.  Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing , 2002, Perception.

[7]  J. Keenan,et al.  Lesions of the fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia , 2002, Neurology.

[8]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[9]  T Yamamoto,et al.  Selective impairment of facial recognition due to a haematoma restricted to the right fusiform and lateral occipital region , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[10]  J. Keenan,et al.  Discrimination of spatial relations and features in faces: Effects of inversion and viewing duration. , 2001, British journal of psychology.

[11]  D. Maurer,et al.  Neuroperception: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.

[12]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  The development of face expertise , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[13]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Hemispheric Asymmetries for Whole-Based and Part-Based Face Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  N. Kanwisher.  Domain specificity in face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  V. Bruce,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology When Inverted Faces Are Recognized: the Role of Configural Information in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[16]  A. Freire,et al.  The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.

[17]  R W Cox,et al.  Real‐time 3D image registration for functional MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  T. Poggio,et al.  Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The Effect of Face Inversion on Activity in Human Neural Systems for Face and Object Perception , 1999, Neuron.

[22]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Stimulus inversion and the responses of face and object-sensitive cortical areas. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[23]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area , 1998, Cognition.

[24]  M. Farah,et al.  What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.

[25]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  G. Winocur,et al.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[28]  I Biederman,et al.  Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[29]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Josh H. McDermott,et al.  Functional imaging of human visual recognition. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[31]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and processing of component and spatial–relational information in faces. , 1996 .

[33]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  What causes the face inversion effect , 1995 .

[35]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Understanding face recognition: Caricauture effects, inversion, and the homogeneity problem , 1994 .

[36]  G. Rhodes,et al.  What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.

[37]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[38]  T. Valentine.  Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[39]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[40]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[41]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[42]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[43]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Does the human brain process objects of expertise like faces? A review of the evidence , 2005 .

[44]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[45]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.