Normalization strategies for nasal acceleration to assess velopharyngeal function

Velopharyngeal function is essential for intelligible speech production, but can often be impaired. Current clinical care could be improved with the use of reliable and objective methods of assessment appropriate for home use. This paper explores the use of a combined nasal acceleration and acoustic sensor to assess velopharyngeal function. Speech production data in nasalized and non-nasalized contexts is recorded from N=6 healthy participants and three normalization strategies are assessed. Normalizing data to maximally nasal productions results in a reduction of between-speaker variability. Using a filtered speech signal can reduce the effects of intra-speaker variability caused be differences in loudness. The normalization strategies pursued show high discriminability of nasalization in vowels with an inexpensive sensor appropriate for home use.

[1]  S G Fletcher,et al.  Performance of children with severe to profound auditory impairment in instrumentally guided reduction of nasal resonance. , 1980, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[2]  A P Vanderas,et al.  Incidence of cleft lip, cleft palate, and cleft lip and palate among races: a review. , 1987, The Cleft palate journal.

[3]  Harlan Muntz,et al.  Quality of life in children with velopharyngeal insufficiency. , 2007, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[4]  B. J. Mcwilliams,et al.  Some factors in the intelligibility of cleft-palate speech. , 1954, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[5]  I. Hočevar-Boltežar,et al.  Ear, nose and voice problems in children with orofacial clefts , 2006, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[6]  Megan Hodge,et al.  Preliminary Results of an Intelligibility Measure for English-Speaking Children with Cleft Palate , 2007, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[7]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[8]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  An acoustic study of the relationships among neurologic disease, dysarthria type, and severity of dysarthria. , 2011, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[9]  Christopher R Watts,et al.  Effects of computer system and vowel loading on measures of nasalance. , 2011, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[10]  K. Lewis,et al.  The Relationship between Nasalance Scores and Nasality Ratings Obtained with Equal Appearing Interval and Direct Magnitude Estimation Scaling Methods , 2010, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[11]  A. Kummer,et al.  Evaluation and Treatment of Resonance Disorders , 1996 .

[12]  Angelika Stellzig-Eisenhauer,et al.  The Effect of Nasopharyngoscopic Biofeedback in Patients with Cleft Palate and Velopharyngeal Dysfunction , 2005, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[13]  Y Horii,et al.  An accelerometric measure as a physical correlate of perceived hypernasality in speech. , 1983, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  Coarticulation • Suprasegmentals,et al.  Acoustic Phonetics , 2019, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders.

[15]  K. Yorkston,et al.  Evidence-Based Practice Guidelines for Dysarthria: Management of Velopharyngeal Function - Academy of Neurologic Communication Disorders and Sciences: Writing Committee for Practice Guidelines in Dysarthria: , 2001 .

[16]  Sheree L Boulet,et al.  Health care use and health and functional impact of developmental disabilities among US children, 1997-2005. , 2009, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.