Improving the Effectiveness of Psychological Interventions for Depression and Anxiety in Cardiac Rehabilitation

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background: Depression and anxiety in cardiovascular disease are significant, contributing to poor prognosis. Unfortunately, current psychological treatments offer mixed, usually small improvements in these symptoms. The present trial tested for the first time the effects of group metacognitive therapy (MCT; 6 sessions) on anxiety and depressive symptoms when delivered alongside cardiac rehabilitation (CR). Methods: A total of 332 CR patients recruited from 5 National Health Service Trusts across the North-West of England were randomly allocated to MCT+CR (n=163, 49.1%) or usual CR alone (n=169, 50.9%). Randomization was 1:1 via minimization balancing arms on sex and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores within hospital site. The primary outcome was Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale total after treatment (4-month follow-up). Secondary outcomes were individual Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales, traumatic stress symptoms, and psychological mechanisms including metacognitive beliefs and repetitive negative thinking. Analysis was intention to treat. Results: The adjusted group difference on the primary outcome, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale total score at 4 months, significantly favored the MCT+CR arm (–3.24 [95% CI, –4.67 to –1.81], P<0.001; standardized effect size, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.291 to 0.750]). The significant difference was maintained at 12 months (–2.19 [95% CI, –3.72 to –0.66], P=0.005; standardized effect size, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.101 to 0.568]). The intervention improved outcomes significantly for both depression and anxiety symptoms when assessed separately compared with usual care. Sensitivity analysis using multiple imputation of missing values supported these findings. Most secondary outcomes favored MCT+CR, with medium to high effect sizes for psychological mechanisms of metacognitive beliefs and repetitive negative thinking. No adverse treatment-related events were reported. Conclusions: Group MCT+CR significantly improved depression and anxiety compared with usual care and led to greater reductions in unhelpful metacognitions and repetitive negative thinking. Most gains remained significant at 12 months. Study strengths include a large sample, a theory-based intervention, use of longer-term follow-up, broad inclusion criteria, and involvement of a trials unit. Limitations include no control for additional contact as part of MCT to estimate nonspecific effects, and the trial was not intended to assess cardiac outcomes. Nonetheless, results demonstrated that addition of the MCT intervention had broad and significant beneficial effects on mental health symptoms. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: ISRCTN74643496.

[1]  A. Wells,et al.  Establishing the Feasibility of Group Metacognitive Therapy for Anxiety and Depression in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Single-Blind Randomized Pilot Study , 2020, Frontiers in Psychiatry.

[2]  A. Wells,et al.  Metacognitive Therapy versus Cognitive Behaviour Therapy in Adults with Major Depression: A Parallel Single-Blind Randomised Trial , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[3]  A. Wells Breaking the Cybernetic Code: Understanding and Treating the Human Metacognitive Control System to Enhance Mental Health , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[4]  J. Higgins,et al.  Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect , 2019, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

[5]  S. Golder,et al.  Determinants of depression in patients with comorbid depression following cardiac rehabilitation , 2019, Open Heart.

[6]  P. Doherty,et al.  Standards and core components for cardiovascular disease prevention and rehabilitation , 2019, Heart.

[7]  A. Wells,et al.  Qualitative Analysis of Emotional Distress in Cardiac Patients From the Perspectives of Cognitive Behavioral and Metacognitive Theories: Why Might Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Have Limited Benefit, and Might Metacognitive Therapy Be More Effective? , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[8]  N. Morina,et al.  The Efficacy of Metacognitive Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[9]  O. Hjemdal,et al.  Metacognitive therapy versus cognitive–behavioural therapy in adults with generalised anxiety disorder , 2018, BJPsych open.

[10]  A. Wells,et al.  Improving the effectiveness of psychological interventions for depression and anxiety in the cardiac rehabilitation pathway using group-based metacognitive therapy (PATHWAY Group MCT): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial , 2018, Trials.

[11]  W. Kraus,et al.  Enhancing Cardiac Rehabilitation With Stress Management Training: A Randomized, Clinical Efficacy Trial , 2016, Circulation.

[12]  S. Beach,et al.  Collaborative care for depression and anxiety disorders in patients with recent cardiac events: the Management of Sadness and Anxiety in Cardiology (MOSAIC) randomized clinical trial. , 2014, JAMA internal medicine.

[13]  Faith Parsons,et al.  Centralized, stepped, patient preference-based treatment for patients with post-acute coronary syndrome depression: CODIACS vanguard randomized controlled trial. , 2013, JAMA internal medicine.

[14]  T. Kohlmann,et al.  Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. , 2012, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[15]  H. Khalil Psychological and pharmacological interventions for depression in patients with coronary artery disease , 2011 .

[16]  E. Walker,et al.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 2013 .

[17]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. , 2016, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[18]  B. Thombs,et al.  Prognostic association of depression following myocardial infarction with mortality and cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis of 25 years of research. , 2011, General hospital psychiatry.

[19]  G. Bonsel,et al.  Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) , 2011, Quality of Life Research.

[20]  Constantine Frangakis,et al.  Multiple imputation by chained equations: what is it and how does it work? , 2011, International journal of methods in psychiatric research.

[21]  Michele Tarsilla Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.

[22]  Adrian Wells,et al.  Metacognitive Therapy for Anxiety and Depression , 2008 .

[23]  N. Frasure-smith,et al.  Effects of citalopram and interpersonal psychotherapy on depression in patients with coronary artery disease: the Canadian Cardiac Randomized Evaluation of Antidepressant and Psychotherapy Efficacy (CREATE) trial. , 2007, JAMA.

[24]  R. Carney,et al.  Depression and Late Mortality After Myocardial Infarction in the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD) Study , 2004, Psychosomatic medicine.

[25]  Adrian Wells,et al.  A short form of the metacognitions questionnaire: properties of the MCQ-30. , 2004, Behaviour research and therapy.

[26]  Marion K Campbell,et al.  The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials. a review. , 2002, Controlled clinical trials.

[27]  T. T. Haug,et al.  The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. , 2002, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[28]  R C Littell,et al.  Mixed Models: Modelling Covariance Structure in the Analysis of Repeated Measures Data , 2005 .

[29]  G. Serban Assessing Psychological Trauma and PTSD , 1999 .

[30]  N. Jacobson,et al.  Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. , 1991, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[31]  R. Snaith,et al.  The Hospital Anxiety And Depression Scale , 2003, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[32]  M. Hotopf,et al.  Depression and anxiety symptom trajectories in coronary heart disease: Associations with measures of disability and impact on 3-year health care costs. , 2018, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[33]  Shah Ebrahim,et al.  Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[34]  Helena Motlagh,et al.  Impact of Event Scale-revised. , 2010, Journal of physiotherapy.

[35]  C. Padesky,et al.  Mind over mood: A cognitive therapy treatment manual for clients. , 1995 .