Upside-down diplomacy – foreign perceptions about Bolsonaro’s intentions and initial transformations of Brazil’s foreign policy and status
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Joseph M. Parent,et al. The Status of Status in World Politics , 2021, World Politics.
[2] F. Guimarães,et al. Far-right populism and foreign policy identity: Jair Bolsonaro's ultra-conservatism and the new politics of alignment , 2021 .
[3] João Victor da Motta Baptista,et al. POLÍTICA DE ESTADO OU DE GOVERNO? A REORIENTAÇÃO DA POLÍTICA EXTERNA BRASILEIRA SOB O GOVERNO BOLSONARO , 2021 .
[4] M. Khvan. Brazilian Foreign Policy under Jair Bolsonaro , 2020 .
[5] M. Amorim,et al. The Brazilian Government's mistakes in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, The Lancet.
[6] Elias Götz. Status Matters in World Politics , 2020, International Studies Review.
[7] S. Chavoshi. The struggle for recognition in International Relations: status, revisionism, and rising powers , 2020 .
[8] Raúl Bernal-Meza,et al. Bolsonaro versus Rio Branco: transição hegemônica, América do Sul e política externa* , 2020 .
[9] W. Gonçalves,et al. Considerações sobre a política externa brasileira no governo Bolsonaro e as relações EUA-Brasil , 2020 .
[10] J. Waynberg. L’image internationale du Brésil à l’ère de Bolsonaro , 2020 .
[11] Status and the Rise of Brazil , 2020 .
[12] Christiana Schallhorn. Samba, sun and social issues: How the 2014 FIFA World Cup and the 2016 Rio Olympics changed perceptions of Germans about Brazil , 2020, International Review for the Sociology of Sport.
[13] M. Kaczmarski. Quest for status: Chinese and Russian foreign policy , 2019, International Affairs.
[14] Fabrício H. Chagas-Bastos. Political Realignment in Brazil: Jair Bolsonaro and the Right Turn , 2019, Revista de Estudios Sociales.
[15] Virginia Braun,et al. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis , 2019, Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health.
[16] D. W. Larson. Status competition among Russia, India, and China in clubs: a source of stalemate or innovation in global governance , 2019, Contemporary Politics.
[17] D. W. Larson,et al. Quest for Status , 2019 .
[18] W. Hunter,et al. Bolsonaro and Brazil's Illiberal Backlash , 2019, Journal of Democracy.
[19] B. Carvalho. Brazil’s (Frustrated) Quest for Higher Status , 2019, Status and the Rise of Brazil.
[20] Daniel Flemes,et al. Brazil First, Climate Last: Bolsonaro's Foreign Policy , 2019 .
[21] Mike Ribeiro,et al. Peace Operations, Intervention and Brazilian Foreign Policy: Key Issues and Debates , 2019, Status and the Rise of Brazil.
[22] Paulo Esteves,et al. Climbing the Ladder: Brazil and the International Security Field , 2019, Status and the Rise of Brazil.
[23] P. Beaumont,et al. Brazil’s Status Struggles: Why Nice Guys Finish Last , 2019, Status and the Rise of Brazil.
[24] P. Beaumont,et al. Grading greatness: evaluating the status performance of the BRICS , 2018, Third World Quarterly.
[25] Marina G. Duque. Recognizing International Status: A Relational Approach , 2018 .
[26] Manjeet S. Pardesi,et al. Indian Foreign Policy under Modi: A New Brand or Just Repackaging? , 2018, International Studies Perspectives.
[27] Megan Pickup. Brazil in the World: The International Relations of a South American Giant , 2017 .
[28] Sean W. Burges. Euforia e fracasso do Brasil Grande: política externa e multinacionais brasileiras da era Lula [Euphoria and failure of Grand Brazil: foreign policy and Brazilian multinationals in the Lula era] , 2017 .
[29] D. Buarque. THE TAINTED SPOTLIGHT – HOW CRISIS OVERSHADOWED BRAZIL’S PUBLIC DIPLOMACY BET IN HOSTING SPORTS EVENTS AND LED TO A DOWNGRADE OF THE COUNTRY’S REPUTATION , 2017 .
[30] Valeria Lo Iacono,et al. Skype as a Tool for Qualitative Research Interviews , 2016 .
[31] S. Seitz. Pixilated partnerships, overcoming obstacles in qualitative interviews via Skype: a research note , 2016 .
[32] Tullo Vigevani,et al. A política externa brasileira: a busca da autonomia, de Sarney a Lula , 2016 .
[33] Yvonne Koch. Gender In International Relations Feminist Perspectives On Achieving Global Security , 2016 .
[34] D. Buarque. One Country, Two Cups—The International Image of Brazil in 1950 and in 2014: A Study of the Reputation and the Identity of Brazil as Projected by the International Media During the Two FIFA World Cups in the Country , 2015 .
[35] Mahrukh Doctor. Brazil's Role in Institutions of Global Economic Governance: The WTO and G20 , 2015 .
[36] Flávio Pedroso Mendes. O Brasil e a reforma do Conselho de Segurança: uma análise realista , 2015 .
[37] M. Hirst. Emerging Brazil: The Challenges of Liberal Peace and Global Governance , 2015 .
[38] C. Stolte. Brazil's Africa Strategy , 2015 .
[39] P. D. Pós-graduação,et al. EM BUSCA DE PRESTÍGIO INTERNACIONAL? A POLÍTICA EXTERNA BRASILEIRA PARA OBTENÇÃO DE ASSENTOS PERMANENTES NA LIGA DAS NAÇÕES E NA ONU (1921-1926; 1994-2010) , 2014 .
[40] Leticia Pinheiro,et al. Cooperation for Development, Brazilian Regional Leadership and Global Protagonism , 2014 .
[41] Virginia Braun,et al. How to use thematic analysis with interview data (process research) , 2014 .
[42] Kelly Wakefield,et al. Skype interviewing: reflections of two PhD researchers , 2014 .
[43] Diego Pautasso,et al. A POLÍTICA DA POLÍTICA EXTERNA BRASILEIRA: NOVAMENTE ENTRE AUTONOMIA E ALINHAMENTO NA ELEIÇÃO DE 2014 , 2014 .
[44] Deborah Welch Larson,et al. Status in World Politics , 2014 .
[45] Anne L. Clunan. Status in World Politics: Why Status Matters in World Politics , 2014 .
[46] D. W. Larson,et al. Status in World Politics: Managing Rising Powers: The Role of Status Concerns , 2014 .
[47] B. Early,et al. Going for the gold: Status-seeking behavior and Olympic performance , 2013 .
[48] Peter M. Beattie. O Dia Em Que Adiaram O Carnaval: Política Externa E a Construção Do Brasil , 2013 .
[49] Virginia Braun,et al. Successful Qualitative Research: A practical guide for beginners , 2013, QMiP Bulletin.
[50] J. Saraiva,et al. FUTEBOL, SAMBA E SEXO: AFINAL, É ISSO O BRASIL? , 2012 .
[51] Monica Herz. Brazil: Major Power in the Making? , 2011 .
[52] E. V. Garcia. De como o Brasil quase se tornou membro permanente do Conselho de Segurança da ONU em 1945 , 2011 .
[53] Antônio Carlos Lessa,et al. Distanciamento versus engajamento: alguns aportes conceituais para a análise da inserção do multilateralismo brasileiro (1945-1990) , 2010 .
[54] J. Vargas. Persuadir e legitimar: a argumentação brasileira em favor da reforma do conselho de segurança , 2008 .
[55] V. Braun,et al. Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .
[56] A. Hurrell. Hegemony, liberalism and global order: what space for would‐be great powers? , 2006 .
[57] V. Arraes. O Brasil e o Conselho de Segurança da Organização das Nações Unidas: dos anos 90 a 2002 , 2005 .
[58] Dawisson Belém Lopes,et al. Balanço sobre a Inserção Internacional do Brasil , 2004 .
[59] N. Santos,et al. A identidade internacional do Brasil e a política externa brasileira: passado, presente e futuro , 2002 .
[60] 计 翔翔,et al. 世界外交知识词典 = A dictionary of the diplomacy , 2001 .
[61] C. Lafer. Brazilian international identity and foreign policy : Past, present, and future , 2000 .
[62] Richard E. Boyatzis,et al. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .
[63] Sueo Sudo,et al. Ideas and Foreign Policy , 1995 .
[64] C. Hill,et al. Ideas and foreign policy: beliefs, institutions and political change , 1994 .
[65] A. Huberman,et al. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook , 1994 .
[66] Alexander Wendt,et al. Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics , 1992, International Organization.
[67] Celso Lafer. Reflexoes sobre a insercao do Brasil no contexto internacional , 1990 .
[68] A. Hurrell. The quest for autonomy : the evolution of Brazil's role in the international system, 1964-1985 , 1986 .
[69] R.W.G.. Brazil and the World , 1982, The Americas.
[70] Hedley Bull,et al. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics , 1995 .
[71] E. Burns. Tradition and Variation in Brazilian Foreign Policy , 1967 .