The Correction of Eye Blink Artefacts in the EEG: A Comparison of Two Prominent Methods

Background The study investigated the residual impact of eyeblinks on the electroencephalogram (EEG) after application of different correction procedures, namely a regression method (eye movement correction procedure, EMCP) and a component based method (Independent Component Analysis, ICA). Methodology/Principle Findings Real and simulated data were investigated with respect to blink-related potentials and the residual mutual information of uncorrected vertical electrooculogram (EOG) and corrected EEG, which is a measure of residual EOG contribution to the EEG. The results reveal an occipital positivity that peaks at about 250ms after the maximum blink excursion following application of either correction procedure. This positivity was not observable in the simulated data. Mutual information of vertical EOG and EEG depended on the applied regression procedure. In addition, different correction results were obtained for real and simulated data. ICA yielded almost perfect correction in all conditions. However, under certain conditions EMCP yielded comparable results to the ICA approach. Conclusion In conclusion, for EMCP the quality of correction depended on the EMCP variant used and the structure of the data, whereas ICA always yielded almost perfect correction. However, its disadvantage is the much more complex data processing, and that it requires a suitable amount of data.

[1]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  P. Berg,et al.  The residual after correcting event-related potentials for blink artifacts. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[3]  Wentian Li Mutual information functions versus correlation functions , 1990 .

[4]  R. Verleger,et al.  The instruction to refrain from blinking affects auditory P3 and N1 amplitudes. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  Otavio G. Lins,et al.  Ocular artifacts in recording EEGs and event related potentials. , 1993 .

[6]  Pierre Comon,et al.  Independent component analysis, A new concept? , 1994, Signal Process..

[7]  P. Berg,et al.  A fast method for forward computation of multiple-shell spherical head models. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution , 1995, Neural Computation.

[9]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Independent Component Analysis of Electroencephalographic Data , 1995, NIPS.

[10]  R. Barry,et al.  EOG correction: a new aligned-artifact average solution. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Independent Component Analysis Using an Extended Infomax Algorithm for Mixed Sub-Gaussian and Super-Gaussian Sources , 1999, Neural Comput..

[12]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Independent Component Analysis Using an Extended Infomax Algorithm for Mixed Subgaussian and Supergaussian Sources , 1999, Neural Computation.

[13]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[14]  R. Barry,et al.  Removal of ocular artifact from the EEG: a review , 2000, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Analysis and visualization of single‐trial event‐related potentials , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[16]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Imaging brain dynamics using independent component analysis , 2001, Proc. IEEE.

[17]  Rodney J Croft,et al.  Issues relating to the subtraction phase in EOG artefact correction of the EEG. , 2002, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[18]  S. Wu,et al.  Adler's Physiology of the Eye , 2002 .

[19]  Armando Malanda,et al.  Independent Component Analysis as a Tool to Eliminate Artifacts in EEG: A Quantitative Study , 2003, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[20]  S. Makeig,et al.  Mining event-related brain dynamics , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[22]  C. Joyce,et al.  Automatic removal of eye movement and blink artifacts from EEG data using blind component separation. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[23]  A. Engel,et al.  Trial-by-Trial Coupling of Concurrent Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Identifies the Dynamics of Performance Monitoring , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Terence W. Picton,et al.  Ocular artifacts in recording EEGs and event-related potentials II: Source dipoles and source components , 2005, Brain Topography.

[25]  Jean Gotman,et al.  Removing Eye‐movement Artifacts from the EEG during the Intracarotid Amobarbital Procedure , 2005, Epilepsia.

[26]  R. Barry,et al.  EOG correction: a comparison of four methods. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[27]  A. Engel,et al.  What is novel in the novelty oddball paradigm? Functional significance of the novelty P3 event-related potential as revealed by independent component analysis. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[28]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis , 2007, NeuroImage.