A GIS framework for the refinement of species geographic ranges

The archives of species range polygons developed under comprehensive assessments of the conservation status of species, such as the IUCN's Global Assessments, are a significant resource in the analysis of biodiversity for conservation planning. Species range polygons obtained from these studies are known to exhibit omissions (because of knowledge gaps) and imprecision in their boundaries. In this work, we present a method to refine those species range polygons in order to create more realistic representations of species geographic ranges. Using range polygons of four species of mammals in South America and environmental variables at a 1 km resolution, combined with a set of GIS algorithms, a procedure was developed to map the confidence that sub-polygon elements belong to a logical species range. The confidence map is then used as a weight for a Mahalanobis typicality empirical modelling procedure to generate a map of species-weighted typicalities that is then thresholded to generate the refined species range map. Methods for variable selection and quality assessment of the refined range are also included in the procedure. Analysis using independent validation data shows the power of this methodology to redefine species ranges in a more biophysically reasonable way. The quality of the final-range map depends on the habitat suitability threshold used to define the species range. The report of quality assessment produced is useful for identifying not only the threshold that produces the highest match to the original expert range but also for flagging those ranges with higher discrepancies, facilitating the identification of ranges that need further revision.

[1]  M. Araújo,et al.  Reducing uncertainty in projections of extinction risk from climate change , 2005 .

[2]  D. W. Shimwell,et al.  Areography: Geographical Strategies of Species , 1983 .

[3]  I. Jolliffe,et al.  Forecast verification : a practitioner's guide in atmospheric science , 2011 .

[4]  N. Campbell,et al.  Derivation and applications of probabilistic measures of class membership from the maximum-likelihood classification , 1992 .

[5]  G. Musser,et al.  Systematic studies of oryzomyine rodents (Muridae, Sigmodontinae) : a synopsis of Microryzomys. Bulletin of the AMNH ; no. 191 , 1989 .

[6]  Virginia Hayssen,et al.  Bradypus variegatus (Pilosa: Bradypodidae) , 2010 .

[7]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data , 2006 .

[8]  Jane Elith,et al.  Species Distribution Modeling , 2019, Ecology.

[9]  M. Austin Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling , 2002 .

[10]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Global climate change and mammalian species diversity in U.S. national parks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  A new species of three-toed sloth lMammaliac Xenarthrar from Panamac with a review of the genus Bradypus , 2001 .

[12]  B. Young,et al.  Response to Comment on "Status and Trends of Amphibian Declines and Extinctions Worldwide" , 2005, Science.

[13]  Omri Allouche,et al.  A comparative evaluation of presence‐only methods for modelling species distribution , 2007 .

[14]  John Bell,et al.  A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models , 1997, Environmental Conservation.

[15]  J. Swets Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: their ROCs and implied models. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Steven D. Gaines,et al.  Temperature or Transport? Range Limits in Marine Species Mediated Solely by Flow , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[17]  T. Dawson,et al.  Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions , 2005 .

[18]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Global mammal distributions, biodiversity hotspots, and conservation , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Ana S. L. Rodrigues,et al.  Shortcuts for Biodiversity Conservation Planning: The Effectiveness of Surrogates , 2007 .

[20]  Chandra Giri,et al.  Protection of Mammal Diversity in Central America , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[21]  D. Gilmore,et al.  An update on the physiology of two- and three-toed sloths. , 2000, Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas.

[22]  Herbert A. Raffaele The Birds of South America. Volume I: The Oscine Passerines: Jays and Swallows; Wrens, Thrushes, and Allies; Vireos and Wood-Warblers; Tanagers, Icterids, and Finches. Robert S. Ridgely , Guy Tudor , 1990 .

[23]  F. Wang Improving remote sensing image analysis through fuzzy information representation , 1990 .

[24]  G. H. Albrecht Assessing the affinities of fossils using canonical variates and generalized distances , 1992 .

[25]  G. Powell,et al.  Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth , 2001 .

[26]  J. Elith,et al.  Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time , 2009 .

[27]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[28]  Steven T. Knick,et al.  Limitations to mapping habitat-use areas in changing landscapes using the Mahalanobis distance statistic , 1998 .

[29]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges , 2003 .

[30]  Carolina Gómez-Posada,et al.  Resource Use and Seed Dispersal by Red Howler Monkeys (Alouatta seniculus) in a Colombian Andean Forest , 2007 .

[31]  Kimberly G. Smith,et al.  A multivariate model of female black bear habitat use for a geographic information system , 1993 .

[32]  G. Foody A fuzzy sets approach to the representation of vegetation continua from remotely sensed data : an example from lowland health , 1992 .