Using Landsat satellite data to support pesticide exposure assessment in California

BackgroundThe recent U.S. Geological Survey policy offering Landsat satellite data at no cost provides researchers new opportunities to explore relationships between environment and health. The purpose of this study was to examine the potential for using Landsat satellite data to support pesticide exposure assessment in California.Methods and ResultsWe collected a dense time series of 24 Landsat 5 and 7 images spanning the year 2000 for an agricultural region in Fresno County. We intersected the Landsat time series with the California Department of Water Resources (CDWR) land use map and selected field samples to define the phenological characteristics of 17 major crop types or crop groups. We found the frequent overpass of Landsat enabled detection of crop field conditions (e.g., bare soil, vegetated) over most of the year. However, images were limited during the winter months due to cloud cover. Many samples designated as single-cropped in the CDWR map had phenological patterns that represented multi-cropped or non-cropped fields, indicating they may have been misclassified.ConclusionsWe found the combination of Landsat 5 and 7 image data would clearly benefit pesticide exposure assessment in this region by 1) providing information on crop field conditions at or near the time when pesticides are applied, and 2) providing information for validating the CDWR map. The Landsat image time-series was useful for identifying idle, single-, and multi-cropped fields. Landsat data will be limited during the winter months due to cloud cover, and for years prior to the Landsat 7 launch (1999) when only one satellite was operational at any given time. We suggest additional research to determine the feasibility of integrating CDWR land use maps and Landsat data to derive crop maps in locations and time periods where maps are not available, which will allow for substantial improvements to chemical exposure estimation.

[1]  C. Justice,et al.  Analysis of the phenology of global vegetation using meteorological satellite data , 1985 .

[2]  J. Behren,et al.  Agricultural pesticide use in California: pesticide prioritization, use densities, and population distributions for a childhood cancer study. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[3]  A. Hursthouse,et al.  Transport and dynamics of toxic pollutants in the natural environment and their effect on human health: research gaps and challenge , 2009, Environmental geochemistry and health.

[4]  Joanne S. Colt,et al.  Proximity to Crops and Residential Exposure to Agricultural Herbicides in Iowa , 2006, Environmental health perspectives.

[5]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Mapping and Monitoring Agricultural Crops and Other Land Cover in the Lower Colorado River Basin , 1998 .

[6]  T. Jackson,et al.  Vegetation water content estimation for corn and soybeans using spectral indices derived from MODIS near- and short-wave infrared bands , 2005 .

[7]  B. Thompson,et al.  Evaluation of take-home organophosphorus pesticide exposure among agricultural workers and their children. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[8]  J. Stoker,et al.  The Department of Health and Human Services. , 1999, Home healthcare nurse.

[9]  William B. Gail,et al.  Remote sensing in the coming decade: the vision and the reality , 2006, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[10]  C. Perry,et al.  Functional equivalence of spectral vegetation indices , 1984 .

[11]  B. Markham,et al.  Summary of Current Radiometric Calibration Coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI Sensors , 2009 .

[12]  X. Pons,et al.  Monitoring farmers' decisions on Mediterranean irrigated crops using satellite image time series , 2008 .

[13]  J. Reif,et al.  Agricultural Pesticide Use and Hypospadias in Eastern Arkansas , 2006, Environmental health perspectives.

[14]  Prasad S. Thenkabail,et al.  Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper models of soybean and corn crop characteristics , 1994 .

[15]  C. Field,et al.  Relationships Between NDVI, Canopy Structure, and Photosynthesis in Three Californian Vegetation Types , 1995 .

[16]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[17]  R A Fenske,et al.  Pesticide exposure of children in an agricultural community: evidence of household proximity to farmland and take home exposure pathways. , 2000, Environmental research.

[18]  G. L. Schmidt,et al.  A multi‐scale segmentation approach to filling gaps in Landsat ETM+ SLC‐off images , 2007 .

[19]  D. Landgrebe.  The Evolution of Landsat Data Analysis , 1997 .

[20]  Ryan S. Miller,et al.  Identifying populations potentially exposed to agricultural pesticides using remote sensing and a Geographic Information System. , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[21]  S. G. Nelson,et al.  Relationship Between Remotely-sensed Vegetation Indices, Canopy Attributes and Plant Physiological Processes: What Vegetation Indices Can and Cannot Tell Us About the Landscape , 2008, Sensors.

[22]  Ryan S. Miller,et al.  Linkage of the California Pesticide Use Reporting Database with Spatial Land Use Data for Exposure Assessment , 2007, Environmental health perspectives.

[23]  Darrel L. Williams,et al.  Landsat and Earth Systems Science : Development of terrestrial monitoring , 1997 .

[24]  S. Melly,et al.  Using GIS and historical records to reconstruct residential exposure to large-scale pesticide application , 2002, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[25]  D. Roy,et al.  The availability of cloud-free Landsat ETM+ data over the conterminous United States and globally , 2008 .

[26]  Beate Ritz,et al.  Historical pesticide exposure in California using pesticide use reports and land-use surveys: an assessment of misclassification error and bias. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.