Robust design optimization using surrogate models

The use of surrogate models (response surface models, curve fits) of various types (radial basis functions, Gaussian process models, neural networks, support vector machines, etc.) is now an accepted way for speeding up design search and optimization in many fields of engineering that require the use of expensive computer simulations, including problems with multiple goals and multiple domains. Surrogates are also widely used in dealing with uncertainty quantification of expensive black-box codes where there are strict limits on the number of function evaluations that can be afforded in estimating the statistical properties of derived performance quantities. Here, we tackle the problem of robust design optimization from the direction of Gaussian process models (Kriging). We contrast two previously studied models, co-Kriging and combined Kriging (sometimes called level 1 Kriging), and propose a new combined approach called combined co-Kriging that attempts to make best use of the key ideas present in these methods.

[1]  Benjamin Peherstorfer,et al.  Optimal Model Management for Multifidelity Monte Carlo Estimation , 2016, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[2]  D. Toal A study into the potential of GPUs for the efficient construction and evaluation of Kriging models , 2016, Engineering with Computers.

[3]  B. Soulier,et al.  Variable-fidelity modeling of structural analysis of assemblies , 2016, J. Glob. Optim..

[4]  Leo Wai-Tsun Ng,et al.  Multifidelity approaches for optimization under uncertainty , 2014 .

[5]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Cokriging for Robust Design Optimization , 2012 .

[6]  Stefan Görtz,et al.  Hierarchical Kriging Model for Variable-Fidelity Surrogate Modeling , 2012 .

[7]  Stefan Görtz,et al.  Alternative Cokriging Method for Variable-Fidelity Surrogate Modeling , 2012 .

[8]  Ralf Zimmermann,et al.  Simplified Cross-Correlation Estimation For Multi-Fidelity Surrogate Cokriging Models , 2010 .

[9]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Robust Optimization in Simulation: Taguchi and Krige Combined , 2009, INFORMS J. Comput..

[10]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Comparison of Several Optimization Strategies for Robust Turbine Blade Design , 2009 .

[11]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling - A Practical Guide , 2008 .

[12]  Apurva Kumar,et al.  Robust design methodologies: application to compressor blades , 2006 .

[13]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Robust Design of Compressor Fan Blades Against Erosion , 2006 .

[14]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Statistical Improvement Criteria for Use in Multiobjective Design Optimization , 2006 .

[15]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Computational Approaches for Aerospace Design: The Pursuit of Excellence , 2005 .

[16]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Wing Optimization Using Design of Experiment, Response Surface, and Data Fusion Methods , 2003 .

[17]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A Fast Elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimisation: NSGA-II , 2000, PPSN.

[18]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available , 2000 .

[19]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions , 1998, J. Glob. Optim..

[20]  Shigeyoshi Tsutsui,et al.  Genetic algorithms with a robust solution searching scheme , 1997, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[21]  Roman B. Statnikov,et al.  Multicriteria Optimization and Engineering , 1995 .

[22]  R. M. Hicks,et al.  Wing Design by Numerical Optimization , 1977 .

[23]  Moinier,et al.  Preconditioned Euler and Navier-Stokes Calculations on Unstructured Meshes , 1998 .

[24]  Jerome Sacks,et al.  Computer Experiments for Quality Control by Parameter Design , 1990 .

[25]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .