The role of process information in narrations while learning with animations and static pictures

The role of process information in annotating narrations used for learning with animations compared to static pictures is examined. In two experiments, seventh and eighth graders from German high schools were randomly assigned to learning environments which differed in the combination of visualization (no visualization vs. static pictures vs. animation) and type of narration (no narration vs. non-process narration vs. process narration). Results revealed that visualizations were necessary for this kind of instructional material to gain a deeper understanding. Moreover, the results consistently show a significant superiority of animations over static pictures. Concerning narrations, results display a significant superiority of process descriptions only in Experiment 1. Contrary to prior assumptions, the interaction of specific information in narrations with the type of visualizations was not significant. Animations are superior to static pictures when learning chemical processes.The presence of visualizations and the presence of narrations facilitated learning.Type of narrations does not moderate learning with animations and static pictures.

[1]  J. Sweller,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: The Modality Principle in Multimedia Learning , 2005 .

[2]  J. Sweller.  Cognitive Load Theory: Cognitive Load Theory: Recent Theoretical Advances , 2010 .

[3]  Ruth N. Schwartz,et al.  Effects of pacing and cognitive style across dynamic and non-dynamic representations , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Incorporating Learner Experience into the Design of Multimedia Instruction. , 2000 .

[5]  R. Mayer,et al.  Learning Science in Virtual Reality Multimedia Environments: Role of Methods and Media , 2002 .

[6]  S. Schwan,et al.  The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots , 2004 .

[7]  Richard K. Lowe,et al.  A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics , 2008 .

[8]  M. Hegarty.  Mental animation: inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Partial Verbal Redundancy in Multimedia Presentations for Writing Strategy Instruction. , 2015 .

[10]  Mireille Betrancourt,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: The Animation and Interactivity Principles in Multimedia Learning , 2005 .

[11]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  The Roles of Mental Animations and External Animations in Understanding Mechanical Systems , 2003 .

[12]  S. Ainsworth.  DeFT: A Conceptual Framework for Considering Learning with Multiple Representations. , 2006 .

[13]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Best-Evidence Synthesis: An Alternative to Meta-Analytic and Traditional Reviews , 1986 .

[14]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[16]  T. Jong.  Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought , 2010 .

[17]  Alain Breuleux,et al.  Effect of Animation in Enhancing Descriptive and Procedural Texts in a Multimedia Learning Environment , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[18]  T. Gog,et al.  Effects of pairs of problems and examples on task performance and different types of cognitive load , 2014 .

[19]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  When static media promote active learning: annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[20]  John Sweller,et al.  The Redundancy Principle in Multimedia Learning , 2005, The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning.

[21]  P. Chandler,et al.  The crucial role of cognitive processes in the design of dynamic visualizations , 2004 .

[22]  Richard K. Lowe,et al.  Dynamic visualisations and learning , 2004 .

[23]  G. Glass,et al.  Consequences of Failure to Meet Assumptions Underlying the Fixed Effects Analyses of Variance and Covariance , 1972 .

[24]  John Sweller,et al.  The Modality Principle in Multimedia Learning , 2014, The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning.

[25]  R. Mayer,et al.  Animations need narrations : an experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis , 1991 .

[26]  Sandra Berney,et al.  Does animation enhance learning? A meta-analysis , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[27]  D. Leutner,et al.  Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis , 2007 .

[28]  R. Mayer,et al.  The instructive animation: helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning , 1992 .

[29]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Animation in computer-based instruction , 1990 .

[30]  Olusola O. Adesope,et al.  Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning environments: A meta-analysis. , 2012 .

[31]  A. Paivio.  Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[32]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[33]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Multimedia in Learning , 2001 .

[34]  N. Hari Narayanan,et al.  Multimedia design for communication of dynamic information , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[35]  F. Paas.  Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. , 1992 .

[36]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  The influence of text modality on learning with static and dynamic visualizations , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[37]  F. Paas,et al.  Can the cognitive load approach make instructional animations more effective , 2007 .

[38]  Richard Catrambone,et al.  Using Animation to Help Students Learn Computer Algorithms , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[39]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  The role of spatial descriptions in learning from multimedia , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[40]  Ric Lowe,et al.  Learning from animation: Where to look, when to look , 2008 .

[41]  Detlev Leutner,et al.  The role of spatial ability in learning from instructional animations - Evidence for an ability-as-compensator hypothesis , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[42]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Animation: can it facilitate? , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[43]  John Sweller,et al.  Instructional Design in Technical Areas , 1999 .

[44]  R. Mayer.  Systematic Thinking Fostered by Illustrations in Scientific Text , 1989 .

[45]  Fred Paas,et al.  Learning from observing hands in static and animated versions of non-manipulative tasks , 2014 .

[46]  Joel Saegert,et al.  The General Linear Model: Data Analysis in the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 1978 .

[47]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive load theory, the transient information effect and e-learning , 2012 .

[48]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory , 2020, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[49]  N. Hari Narayanan,et al.  On designing comprehensible interactive hypermedia manuals , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[50]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Animation principles in multimedia learning , 2014 .

[51]  Dong-Hee Shin,et al.  Effects of spatial ability and richness of motion cue on learning in mechanically complex domain , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[52]  T. Höffler.  Spatial Ability: Its Influence on Learning with Visualizations—a Meta-Analytic Review , 2010 .

[53]  Paul Chandler,et al.  Managing split-attention and redundancy with mulitmedia instruction , 1999 .