Realism of confidence in sensory discrimination: The underconfidence phenomenon

This paper documents a very pervasive underconfidence bias in the area of sensory discrimination. In order to account for this phenomenon, a subjective distance theory of confidence in sensory discrimination is proposed. This theory, based on the law of comparative judgment and the assumption of confidence as an increasing function of the perceived distance between stimuli, predicts underconfidence—that is, that people should perform better than they express in their confidence assessments. Due to the fixed sensitivity of the sensory system, this underconfidence bias is practically impossible to avoid. The results of Experiment 1 confirmed the prediction of underconfidence with the help of present-day calibration methods and indkated-a-good quantitative fit of the theory. The results of Experiment 2 showed that prolonged experience of outcome feedback (160 trials) had no effect on underconfidence. It is concluded that the subjective distance theory provides a better explanation of the underconfidence phenomenon than-do previous accounts in terms of subconscious processes.

[1]  Donald McEwen Johnson,et al.  Confidence and speed in the two-category judgment , 1939 .

[2]  J. Jastrow,et al.  On small differences in sensation , 1884 .

[3]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Subjective Confidence in Forecasts. , 1982 .

[4]  J. M. Cattell,et al.  On the Perception of Small Differences , 1894 .

[5]  David V. Budescu,et al.  Encoding subjective probabilities: A psychological and psychometric review , 1983 .

[6]  L. Thurstone.  A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .

[7]  Leon Festinger,et al.  Studies in decision: I. Decision-time, relative frequency of judgment and subjective confidence as related to physical stimulus difference. , 1943 .

[8]  P. Juslin.  The Overconfidence Phenomenon as a Consequence of Informal Experimenter-Guided Selection of Almanac Items , 1994 .

[9]  Marcus O'Connor,et al.  Models of human behaviour and confidence in judgement: A review , 1989 .

[10]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence. , 1991, Psychological review.

[11]  S. Lichtenstein,et al.  Do those who know more also know more about how much they know?*1 , 1977 .

[12]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980 , 1982 .

[13]  M. Björkman.  Internal Cue Theory: Calibration and Resolution of Confidence in General Knowledge , 1994 .

[14]  Robert L. Winkler,et al.  Probabilistic Prediction: Some Experimental Results , 1971 .

[15]  P. A. Adams,et al.  Realism of confidence judgments. , 1961, Psychological review.

[16]  J K ADAMS,et al.  Laboratory studies of behavior without awareness. , 1957, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  G. Keren.  Calibration and probability judgements: Conceptual and methodological issues , 1991 .

[18]  G. Keren,et al.  On the ability of monitoring non-veridical perceptions and uncertain knowledge: some calibration studies. , 1988, Acta psychologica.

[19]  G. Brier,et al.  External correspondence: Decompositions of the mean probability score , 1982 .

[20]  P. Juslin.  An explanation of the hard-easy effect in studies of realism of confidence in one's general knowledge , 1993 .