Perceiving the Time to Contact of Rotating Non-Spherical Objects

[1]  J. Tresilian.  Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Simon K. Rushton,et al.  Weighted combination of size and disparity: a computational model for timing a ball catch , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Reinoud J Bootsma,et al.  Global and Local Contributions to the Optical Specification of Time to Contact: Observer Sensitivity to Composite Tau , 2002, Perception.

[4]  Scott M. Dittman,et al.  Monocular optical constraints on collision control. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Patricia R. Delucia,et al.  Judgments of relative time-to-contact of more than two approaching objects: Toward a method , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  R. Bootsma,et al.  Timing an attacking forehand drive in table tennis. , 1990 .

[7]  Heiko Hecht,et al.  Image Velocity, Not Tau, Explains Arrival-Time Judgments From Global Optical Flow , 1999 .

[8]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[9]  G J Andersen,et al.  Speed, size, and edge-rate information for the detection of collision events. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  P R DeLucia,et al.  Pictorial and motion-based depth information during active control of self-motion: size-arrival effects on collision avoidance. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  M K Kaiser,et al.  Optical specification of time-to-passage: observers' sensitivity to global tau. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  D. Regan,et al.  Estimating the time to collision with a rotating nonspherical object , 2000, Vision Research.

[13]  Nam-Gyoon Kim,et al.  Multiple sources of information and time-to-contact judgments , 2006, Vision Research.

[14]  J T Todd,et al.  Visual information about moving objects. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  H. Ross,et al.  Optic-Flow and Cognitive Factors in Time-to-Collision Estimates , 1983, Perception.

[16]  K. Davids,et al.  Timing a one-handed catch , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  D. N. Lee,et al.  Aerial docking by hummingbirds , 1991, Naturwissenschaften.

[18]  J M Flach,et al.  Perception and control of altitude: splay and depression angles. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  J. Tresilian,et al.  Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: Analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgment tasks , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Nam-Gyoon Kim,et al.  Dynamic Occlusion and Optical Flow From Corrugated Surfaces , 2008 .

[21]  H. Heuer,et al.  Estimates of Time to Contact Based on Changing Size and Changing Target Vergence , 1993, Perception.

[22]  D Regan,et al.  Visual factors in hitting and catching. , 1997, Journal of sports sciences.

[23]  V Cavallo,et al.  Visual Information and Skill Level in Time-To-Collision Estimation , 1988, Perception.

[24]  Keith Davids,et al.  The shape of things to come: effects of object shape and rotation on the pickup of local Tau , 1996 .

[25]  D Regan,et al.  Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information , 1998, Vision Research.

[26]  W Schiff,et al.  Information Used in Judging Impending Collision , 1979, Perception.