Extreme ultraviolet (EUV) microscopy is an important tool for the investigation of the performance of EUV masks, for detecting the presence and the characteristics of defects, and for evaluating the effectiveness of defect repair techniques. Aerial image measurement bypasses the difficulties inherent to photoresist imaging and enables high data collection speed and flexibility. It provides reliable and quick feedback for the development of masks and lithography system modeling methods. We operate the SEMATECH Berkeley Actinic Inspection Tool (AIT), a EUV microscope installed at the Advanced Light Source at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. The AIT is equipped with several highmagnification Fresnel zoneplate lenses, with various numerical aperture values, that enable it image the reflective mask surface with various resolution and magnification settings. Although the AIT has undergone significant recent improvements in terms of imaging resolution and illumination uniformity, there is still room for improvement. In the AIT, an off-axis zoneplate lens collects the light coming from the sample and an image of the sample is projected onto an EUV-sensitive CCD camera. The simplicity of the optical system is particularly helpful considering that the AIT alignment has to be performed every time that a sample or a zoneplate is replaced. The alignment is sensitive to several parameters such as the lens position and orientation, the illumination direction and the sample characteristics. Since the AIT works in high vacuum, there is no direct access to the optics or to the sample during the alignment and the measurements. For all these reasons the alignment procedures and feedback can be complex, and in some cases can reduce the overall data throughput of the system. In this paper we review the main strategies and procedures that have been developed for quick and reliable alignments, and we describe the performance improvements we have achieved, in terms of aberration magnitude reduction.
[1]
William H. Press,et al.
Numerical recipes in C
,
2002
.
[2]
A. Rosser.
A.I.D.S.
,
1986,
Maryland medical journal.
[3]
Kenneth A. Goldberg,et al.
Performance of actinic EUVL mask imaging using a zoneplate microscope
,
2007,
SPIE Photomask Technology.
[4]
Joseph P. Kirk,et al.
Aberration analysis using reconstructed aerial images of isolated contacts on attenuated phase-shift masks
,
2001,
SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[5]
Nigel R. Farrar,et al.
In-situ measurement of lens aberrations
,
2000,
Advanced Lithography.
[6]
E. H. Linfoot.
Principles of Optics
,
1961
.
[7]
Kenneth A. Goldberg,et al.
Comparison of fast 3D simulation and actinic inspection for EUV masks with buried defects
,
2009,
Advanced Lithography.
[8]
Peter De Bisschop,et al.
Novel aberration monitor for optical lithography
,
1999,
Advanced Lithography.
[9]
Iacopo Mochi,et al.
Benchmarking EUV mask inspection beyond 0.25 NA
,
2008,
Photomask Technology.
[10]
Augustus J. E. M. Janssen,et al.
Determination of resist parameters using the extended Nijboer-Zernike theory
,
2004,
SPIE Advanced Lithography.