The Sizes of Peptides Generated from Protein by Mammalian 26 and 20 S Proteasomes

Knowledge about the sizes of peptides generated by proteasomes during protein degradation is essential to fully understand their degradative mechanisms and the subsequent steps in protein turnover and generation of major histocompatibility complex class I antigenic peptides. We demonstrate here that 26 S and activated 20 S proteasomes from rabbit muscle degrade denatured, nonubiquitinated proteins in a highly processive fashion but generate different patterns of peptides (despite their containing identical proteolytic sites). With both enzymes, products range in length from 3 to 22 residues, and their abundance decreases with increasing length according to a log-normal distribution. Less than 15% of the products are the length of class I presented peptides (8 or 9 residues), and two-thirds are too short to function in antigen presentation. Surprisingly, these mammalian proteasomes, which contain two “chymotryptic,” two “tryptic,” and two “post-acidic” active sites, generate peptides with a similar size distribution as do archaeal 20 S proteasomes, which have 14 identical sites. Furthermore, inactivation of the “tryptic” sites altered the peptides produced without significantly affecting their size distribution. Therefore, this distribution is not determined by the number, specificity, or arrangement of the active sites (as proposed by the “molecular ruler” model); instead, we propose that proteolysis continues until products are small enough to diffuse out of the proteasomes.

[1]  Alexander Varshavsky,et al.  The ubiquitin system. , 1998, Annual review of biochemistry.

[2]  W Keilholz,et al.  Cleavage motifs of the yeast 20S proteasome beta subunits deduced from digests of enolase 1. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  A. Goldberg,et al.  Interferon-γ Can Stimulate Post-proteasomal Trimming of the N Terminus of an Antigenic Peptide by Inducing Leucine Aminopeptidase* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  M. Glickman,et al.  Proteasome cerevisiae Saccharomyces The Regulatory Particle of the , 1997 .

[5]  L. Dick,et al.  Kinetic studies of the branched chain amino acid preferring peptidase activity of the 20S proteasome: development of a continuous assay and inhibition by tripeptide aldehydes and clasto-lactacystin beta-lactone. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[6]  H. Aldrich,et al.  Biochemical Characterization of the 20S Proteasome from the Methanoarchaeon Methanosarcina thermophila , 1998 .

[7]  Wolfgang Baumeister,et al.  The Proteasome: Paradigm of a Self-Compartmentalizing Protease , 1998, Cell.

[8]  Alexei F. Kisselev,et al.  Range of Sizes of Peptide Products Generated during Degradation of Different Proteins by Archaeal Proteasomes* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  C. Larsen,et al.  Protein Translocation Channels in the Proteasome and Other Proteases , 1997, Cell.

[10]  C. Pickart Targeting of substrates to the 26S proteasome , 1997, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[11]  D. Wolf,et al.  The Active Sites of the Eukaryotic 20 S Proteasome and Their Involvement in Subunit Precursor Processing* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  A. Goldberg,et al.  Two distinct proteolytic processes in the generation of a major histocompatibility complex class I-presented peptide. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  M. Hochstrasser,et al.  Identification of the yeast 20S proteasome catalytic centers and subunit interactions required for active-site formation. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  A. Goldberg,et al.  Lactacystin and clasto-Lactacystin β-Lactone Modify Multiple Proteasome β-Subunits and Inhibit Intracellular Protein Degradation and Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Antigen Presentation* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  S. Ōmura,et al.  Potential Immunocompetence of Proteolytic Fragments Produced by Proteasomes before Evolution of the Vertebrate Immune System , 1997, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[16]  R. Huber,et al.  Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4Å resolution , 1997, Nature.

[17]  D. Stuart,et al.  Cutting complexity down to size , 1997, Nature.

[18]  Alexei F. Kisselev,et al.  Processive Degradation of Proteins and Other Catalytic Properties of the Proteasome from Thermoplasma acidophilum* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  M. Hochstrasser,et al.  Autocatalytic Subunit Processing Couples Active Site Formation in the 20S Proteasome to Completion of Assembly , 1996, Cell.

[20]  K Eichmann,et al.  The proteolytic fragments generated by vertebrate proteasomes: structural relationships to major histocompatibility complex class I binding peptides. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Hans-Georg Rammensee,et al.  Coordinated Dual Cleavages Induced by the Proteasome Regulator PA28 Lead to Dominant MHC Ligands , 1996, Cell.

[22]  K. Rock,et al.  Chemical denaturation and modification of ovalbumin alters its dependence on ubiquitin conjugation for class I antigen presentation. , 1996, Journal of immunology.

[23]  K. Rock,et al.  Antigen processing and presentation by the class I major histocompatibility complex. , 1996, Annual review of immunology.

[24]  M. Hochstrasser Ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation. , 1996, Annual review of genetics.

[25]  K Tanaka,et al.  Structure and functions of the 20S and 26S proteasomes. , 1996, Annual review of biochemistry.

[26]  R. Tampé,et al.  Effects of major-histocompatibility-complex-encoded subunits on the peptidase and proteolytic activities of human 20S proteasomes. Cleavage of proteins and antigenic peptides. , 1996, European journal of biochemistry.

[27]  P. A. Peterson,et al.  In Vivo Assembly of the Proteasomal Complexes, Implications for Antigen Processing (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  Marcus Groettrup,et al.  Incorporation of major histocompatibility complex – encoded subunits LMP2 and LMP7 changes the quality of the 20S proteasome polypeptide processing products independent of interferon‐γ , 1995, European journal of immunology.

[29]  D. Rubin,et al.  The proteasome : a protein-degrading organelle ? , 2022 .

[30]  W. Baumeister,et al.  The first characterization of a eubacterial proteasome: the 20S complex of Rhodococcus , 1995, Current Biology.

[31]  W. Baumeister,et al.  Archaebacterial and eukaryotic proteasomes prefer different sites in cleaving gonadotropin-releasing hormone , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  M. Pariat,et al.  Ubiquitinylation is not an absolute requirement for degradation of c- Jun protein by the 26 S proteasome , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  R. Huber,et al.  Crystal structure of the 20S proteasome from the archaeon T. acidophilum at 3.4 A resolution. , 1995, Science.

[34]  W. Baumeister,et al.  Conformational constraints in protein degradation by the 20S proteasome , 1995, Nature Structural Biology.

[35]  A. Goldberg,et al.  Functions of the proteasome in antigen presentation. , 1995, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[36]  R. Huber,et al.  Catalytic mechanism of the 20S proteasome of Thermoplasma acidophilum revealed by X-ray crystallography. , 1995, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[37]  S. Tonegawa,et al.  Altered peptidase and viral-specific T cell response in LMP2 mutant mice. , 1994, Immunity.

[38]  A. Goldberg,et al.  Inhibitors of the proteasome block the degradation of most cell proteins and the generation of peptides presented on MHC class I molecules , 1994, Cell.

[39]  W. Baumeister,et al.  Existence of a molecular ruler in proteasomes suggested by analysis of degradation products , 1994, FEBS letters.

[40]  M. Maurizi,et al.  Processive degradation of proteins by the ATP-dependent Clp protease from Escherichia coli. Requirement for the multiple array of active sites in ClpP but not ATP hydrolysis. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[41]  Clive A. Slaughter,et al.  Proteolytic Processing of Ovalbumin and β-galactosidase by the Proteasome to Yield Antigenic Peptides , 1994 .

[42]  Q. Deveraux,et al.  A 26 S protease subunit that binds ubiquitin conjugates. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[43]  C. Slaughter,et al.  Identification, purification, and characterization of a high molecular weight, ATP-dependent activator (PA700) of the 20 S proteasome. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[44]  A. Rivett,et al.  Multicatalytic endopeptidase complex: proteasome. , 1994, Methods in enzymology.

[45]  S. Matsufuji,et al.  Ornithine decarboxylase is degraded by the 26S proteasome without ubiquitination , 1992, Nature.

[46]  C. Slaughter,et al.  Identification, purification, and characterization of a protein activator (PA28) of the 20 S proteasome (macropain). , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[47]  G N DeMartino,et al.  Degradation of oxidized insulin B chain by the multiproteinase complex macropain (proteasome). , 1991, Biochemistry.

[48]  M. Orłowski,et al.  The multicatalytic proteinase complex, a major extralysosomal proteolytic system. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[49]  A. Goldberg,et al.  Skeletal muscle proteasome can degrade proteins in an ATP-dependent process that does not require ubiquitin. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  A. Goldberg,et al.  Role of ATP hydrolysis in the degradation of proteins by protease la from Escherichia coli , 1986, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[51]  V. Botbol,et al.  Peptide intermediates in the degradation of cellular proteins. Bestatin permits their accumulation in mouse liver in vivo. , 1983, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[52]  B. Davis DISC ELECTROPHORESIS – II METHOD AND APPLICATION TO HUMAN SERUM PROTEINS * , 1964, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[53]  L. Ornstein,et al.  DISC ELECTROPHORESIS. I. BACKGROUND AND THEORY. , 1964, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.