The influence of postural threat on the control of upright stance

Abstract. In order to utilize static posturography as a tool with which to diagnose pathological balance disorders, it is necessary to understand the contribution of psychological factors such as fear of falling. In this study we examined kinetic and kinematic parameters during quiet stance of eight young healthy adults standing under three conditions which posed increasing levels of postural threat. Participants were required to stand quietly, both with and without visual information and with normal or reduced vestibular information for 2-min periods at each of three surface conditions: ground level (low threat), 81 cm above the ground completely surrounded by a support surface (medium threat) and 81 cm above ground at the edge of the surface (high threat). In addition to calculating displacement and frequency measures for movements of centre of pressure (COP) and centre of mass (COM), a measure of stiffness was derived from the difference between COP-COM signal. Mean EMG activity was recorded bilaterally from anterior and posterior muscles of the lower and upper leg. A stiffening strategy was adopted when individuals stood under high threat conditions involving significant changes in kinematic, kinetic and EMG variables. The A-P stiffness constant increased significantly (27.5%) for the high threat compared to low threat condition, independent of vision or vestibular information. Changes in stiffness were accompanied by: (1) backward shift of the mean A-P position of COP and COM, (2) increased mean power frequency and decreased amplitude displacement of the COP and (3) decreased amplitude displacements of the COM. Of the significant changes observed in mean EMG activity with increased postural threat, only tibialis anterior was significantly correlated with increased stiffness, while activity in soleus, medial gastrocnemius and rectus femoris was highly correlated with mean position of COP.

[1]  J. Frank,et al.  Surface height effects on postural control: a hypothesis for a stiffness strategy for stance. , 1999, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[2]  S. Cummings,et al.  Risk factors for recurrent nonsyncopal falls. A prospective study. , 1989, JAMA.

[3]  D. Winter,et al.  Predictions of knee and ankle moments of force in walking from EMG and kinematic data. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  David A. Winter,et al.  Validity of the inverted pendulum model of balance in quiet standing , 1997 .

[5]  D. Winter,et al.  Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  H E Rockette,et al.  Normal subject postural sway during the Romberg test. , 1982, American journal of otolaryngology.

[7]  M. Tinetti,et al.  Falls efficacy as a measure of fear of falling. , 1990, Journal of gerontology.

[8]  B. E. Maki,et al.  A prospective study of postural balance and risk of falling in an ambulatory and independent elderly population. , 1994, Journal of gerontology.

[9]  M. Tinetti,et al.  Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Thomas Brandt,et al.  Increased body sway at 3.5–8 Hz in patients with phobic postural vertigo , 1999, Neuroscience Letters.

[11]  J. H. J. Allum,et al.  Interactions between vestibular and proprioceptive inputs triggering and modulating human balance-correcting responses differ across muscles , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  G. Bruyn Posture and gait: Development, adaptation and modulation By Bernard Amblard, Alain Berthoz and François Clarac (eds.), Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam-New York-Oxford, 1988, ICS 812, Dfl. 265.00 , 1989, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[13]  Måns Magnusson,et al.  Identification of human postural dynamics , 1988 .

[14]  A. Ishida,et al.  Analysis of the posture control system under fixed and sway-referenced support conditions , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  H. Leibowitz,et al.  The effects of visual factors and head orientation on postural steadiness in women 55 to 70 years of age. , 1992, Journal of gerontology.

[16]  R. Brand,et al.  The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly, and pathological , 1992 .

[17]  F. O. Black,et al.  Abnormal postural control associated with peripheral vestibular disorders. , 1988, Progress in brain research.

[18]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Ankle stiffness of standing humans in response to imperceptible perturbation: reflex and task‐dependent components. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  N. Alexander,et al.  Postural Control in Older Adults , 1994, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[20]  David A. Winter,et al.  Signal processing and linear systems for the movement sciences , 1997 .

[21]  D. Winter,et al.  Unified theory regarding A/P and M/L balance in quiet stance. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  P. Gatev,et al.  Feedforward ankle strategy of balance during quiet stance in adults , 1999, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  Fay B. Horak,et al.  The effect of prior leaning on human postural responses , 1993 .

[24]  J. Frank,et al.  Postural compensations to the potential consequences of instability: kinematics , 1997 .

[25]  T Sinha,et al.  Effect of forward lean on postural ankle dynamics. , 1996, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[26]  S C Gandevia,et al.  Loop gain of reflexes controlling human standing measured with the use of postural and vestibular disturbances. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  B. E. Maki,et al.  Fear of falling and postural performance in the elderly. , 1991, Journal of gerontology.