Intertemporal Cost Allocation and Investment Decisions

This paper considers the profit‐maximization problem of a firm that must make sunk investments in long‐lived assets to produce output. It is shown that if per‐period accounting income is calculated using a simple and natural allocation rule for investment, called the relative replacement cost (RRC) rule, under a broad range of plausible circumstances, the firm can choose the fully optimal sequence of investments over time simply by choosing a level of investment each period in order to maximize the next period’s accounting income. Furthermore, in a model in which shareholders delegate the investment decision to a better‐informed manager, it is shown that if accounting income based on the RRC allocation rule is used as a performance measure for the manager, robust incentives are created for the manager to choose the profit‐maximizing sequence of investments, regardless of the manager’s own personal discount rate or other aspects of the manager’s personal preferences.

[1]  S. Malley,et al.  STERN STEWART EVATM ROUND TABLE , 1994 .

[2]  G. Stewart EVA™: FAST AND FANTASY , 1994 .

[3]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Towards an Economic Theory of Replacement Investment , 1974 .

[4]  Stefan Reichelstein,et al.  Controlling Investment Decisions: Depreciation- and Capital Charges , 2002 .

[5]  Madhav V. Rajan,et al.  Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis , 1972 .

[6]  J. Laffont,et al.  Competition in telecommunications , 1999 .

[7]  D. S. Lees,et al.  Consumption and Investment , 1963, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  D. Jorgenson Capital Theory and Investment Behavior , 1963 .

[9]  S. Nickell The investment decisions of firms , 1979 .

[10]  S. Reichelstein,et al.  Providing Managerial Incentives: Cash Flows Versus Accrual Accounting , 2000 .

[11]  H. Young Cost allocation : methods, principles, applications , 1985 .

[12]  A. Messier,et al.  Cost Accounting. , 1939, American journal of public health and the nation's health.

[13]  Stefan Reichelstein,et al.  Incentives for Efficient Inventory Management: The Role of Historical Cost , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Stefan Reichelstein,et al.  Investment Decisions and Managerial Performance Evaluation , 1997 .

[15]  William P. Rogerson,et al.  Inter-temporal Cost Allocation and Managerial Investment Incentives , 1993 .

[16]  W. Rogerson Optimal depreciation schedules for regulated utilities , 1989 .

[17]  S. Knapp Fact and fantasy , 2002, Nature.

[18]  Al Ehrbar,et al.  EVA: The Real Key to Creating Wealth , 1998 .

[19]  John Hof,et al.  4 – Joint Cost Allocation , 1993 .

[20]  Stefan Reichelstein,et al.  Asset Valuation and Performance Measurement in a Dynamic Agency Setting , 1999 .

[21]  The Asymptotic Optimality of Residual Income Maximization , 1998 .

[22]  R. Anctil Capital budgeting using residual income maximization , 1996 .

[23]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Valuing the Effect of Regulation on New Services in Telecommunications , 1997 .

[24]  Kenneth J. Arrow,et al.  Optimal capital policy, the cost of capital, and myopic decision rules , 1964 .

[25]  William P. Rogerson,et al.  Intertemporal Cost Allocation and Managerial Investment Incentives: A Theory Explaining the Use of Economic Value Added as a Performance Measure , 1997, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty. , 1994 .

[27]  Amir Ziv,et al.  Performance Evaluation and Corporate Income Taxes in a Sequential Delegation Setting , 2003 .

[28]  William Feller,et al.  On the Integral Equation of Renewal Theory , 1941 .

[29]  Gerald Foster,et al.  Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis 6th Edition , 1987 .