International wood trade and forest change: A global analysis

Abstract Throughout history, humans have transformed natural forests into agricultural land, settlement areas and managed forests. Studies on the dynamics of forest change are one of the mainstays in land change science. The forest transition theory offers a powerful tool to analyze changes in human interference with forests. At the national level, a range of factors have been found to influence a country's forest change. The role of international wood product trade has, however, rarely been studied based on empirical data. We offer a global assessment of how this trade helps shape observed forest change, by relating forest stock change to net trade of wood products for the period 1997–2007 and by localizing the origin of wood consumed in a given nation. For many nations, traded wood products have a relevant impact on the course of ongoing forest transitions. We develop a general typology of how wood product trade can influence forest change and place various nations within this framework. We find that many wealthy nations with returning forests seem to accelerate this return by importing wood products. These imports appear to be provided by two main types of wood exporters: (a) by wealthy countries with low population densities and stable forests and (b) by relatively poor countries with declining forests, employing increasing population and welfare levels. We discuss these findings in the light of general theories on land use transitions and forest change and conclude by highlighting implications for national forest policies and global environmental governance, aiming at reducing negative impacts of wood products and enhancing the positive role they can play in replacing more fossil fuel intensive products.

[1]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Importing Timber, Exporting Ecological Impact , 2005, Science.

[2]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2006 .

[3]  W. Kurz,et al.  Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change , 2008, Nature.

[4]  Ronald R Rindfuss,et al.  Developing a science of land change: challenges and methodological issues. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Jingyun Fang,et al.  Returning forests analyzed with the forest identity , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Graciela Chichilnisky North-South Trade and the Global Environment , 1994 .

[7]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Forest transition in Vietnam and displacement of deforestation abroad , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Houghton,et al.  The U.S. Carbon budget: contributions from land-Use change , 1999, Science.

[9]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Global patterns of socioeconomic biomass flows in the year 2000: A comprehensive assessment of supply, consumption and constraints , 2008 .

[10]  A. Lugo,et al.  Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests , 1997 .

[11]  Sanderine Nonhebel,et al.  Tracing distant environmental impacts of agricultural products from a consumer perspective , 2011 .

[12]  Robert Walker,et al.  Regional interdependence and forest "transitions": Substitute deforestation limits the relevance of local reversals , 2010 .

[13]  E. Barbier,et al.  The forest transition: Towards a more comprehensive theoretical framework☆ , 2010 .

[14]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change , 2005 .

[15]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Long-term dynamics of terrestrial carbon stocks in Austria: a comprehensive assessment of the time period from 1830 to 2000 , 2007 .

[16]  H. Haberl,et al.  Industrialization, Fossil Fuels, and the Transformation of Land Use , 2008 .

[17]  P. Crutzen,et al.  Biomass Burning in the Tropics: Impact on Atmospheric Chemistry and Biogeochemical Cycles , 1990, Science.

[18]  R. Houghton,et al.  Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850–2000 , 2003 .

[19]  E. Lambin,et al.  Forest transition in Vietnam and its environmental impacts , 2008 .

[20]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Embodied HANPP: Mapping the spatial disconnect between global biomass production and consumption , 2009 .

[21]  Ester Boserup,et al.  The conditions of agricultural growth: The economics of agrarian change under population pressure , 1966 .

[22]  H. Haberl,et al.  Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth's terrestrial ecosystems , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Jonathan Taylor,et al.  Forest resource trade between Japan and Southeast Asia: the structure of dual decay , 2003 .

[24]  E. Lambin,et al.  Land use transitions: Socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change , 2010 .

[25]  Werner A. Kurz,et al.  A 70-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF CARBON FLUXES IN THE CANADIAN FOREST SECTOR , 1999 .

[26]  G. Nabuurs,et al.  Monitoring and reporting carbon stocks and fluxes in Dutch forests , 2000 .

[27]  Yoshiki Yamagata,et al.  A synopsis of land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) under the Kyoto Protocol and Marrakech Accords , 2007 .

[28]  Robert M. Ewers,et al.  Interaction effects between economic development and forest cover determine deforestation rates , 2006 .

[29]  G. Nabuurs,et al.  International Trade in Wood Products: Its Role in the Land Use Change andForestry Carbon Cycle , 2001 .

[30]  K. E. Skog,et al.  Carbon cycling through wood products : The role of wood and paper products in carbon sequestration , 1998 .

[31]  E. Lambin,et al.  The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.