Selecting a Biomass Pelleting Processing Depot Using a Data Driven Decision-Making Approach

Bioenergy is one of the potential solutions to satisfy the extensive demand for energy and reduce fossil fuel dependency. For biomass to be an efficient source of bioenergy, it must be converted to a usable form, one of which is pellets. This study compares three commonly used methods to produce pellets in a biomass depot and presents a framework to select the most effective and economic pelleting processes. The comparison is performed using a data driven decision-making method called the Preference Index Selection Method (PSI). We considered three main pelletization technologies and compared four of their most critical attributes. The three popular biomass pellet processing methods used for this study are the conventional pelleting process (CPP), the high moisture pelleting process (HMPP), and the ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX). These processes were evaluated from both economic and environmental perspectives. We used the state of Mississippi as a testing ground for our analyses. The results obtained through the PSI method were validated with the Grey relational analysis (GRA) method. The results revealed that of the three available pelleting processes, the conventional pelleting process and the high moisture pelleting process were the most economic and environmentally friendly.

[1]  Sandra D. Eksioglu,et al.  Impact of Intermodal Facilities to the Design of Supply Chains for Biorefineries , 2009 .

[2]  M. Junginger,et al.  Wood pellet supply chain costs – A review and cost optimization analysis , 2020, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[3]  Fereshteh Mafakheri,et al.  Modeling of biomass-to-energy supply chain operations: Applications, challenges and research directions , 2014 .

[4]  M. Ahmad,et al.  Renewable biofuel production from biomass: a review for biomass pelletization, characterization, and thermal conversion techniques , 2018, International Journal of Green Energy.

[5]  Mohammad Marufuzzaman,et al.  Sustainable network design for multi-purpose pellet processing depots under biomass supply uncertainty , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[6]  Ger Devlin,et al.  Economic Analysis of Manufacturing Costs of Pellet Production in the Republic of Ireland Using Non-Woody Biomass , 2010 .

[7]  Hamed Soleimani,et al.  Design and optimization of biomass electricity supply chain with uncertainty in material quality, availability and market demand , 2020 .

[8]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  Selection of non-traditional machining processes using analytic network process , 2011 .

[9]  Y. Shastri,et al.  Resiliency optimization of biomass to biofuel supply chain incorporating regional biomass pre-processing depots , 2017 .

[10]  Paris A. Fokaides,et al.  Environmental evaluation of biomass pelleting using life cycle assessment , 2016 .

[11]  R. Oloruntoba,et al.  Public Policy and Biofuels: The Way Forward? , 2007 .

[12]  Miloš Madić,et al.  APPLICATION OF THE PERFORMANCE SELECTION INDEX METHOD FOR SOLVING MACHINING MCDM PROBLEMS , 2017 .

[13]  A. Paletto,et al.  Assessment of environmental impact of biomass power plants to increase the social acceptance of renewable energy technologies , 2019, Heliyon.

[14]  Marianthi G. Ierapetritou,et al.  Optimal design of sustainable chemical processes and supply chains: A review , 2012, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[15]  Li-Wei Chen,et al.  Integration of the grey relational analysis with genetic algorithm for software effort estimation , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Consolación Gil,et al.  Optimization methods applied to renewable and sustainable energy: A review , 2011 .

[17]  Sandeep Grover,et al.  Application of preference selection index method for decision making over the design stage of production system life cycle , 2015 .

[18]  B. Parresol Biomass , 2019, Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics.

[19]  Robert Phaal,et al.  From theory to practice: challenges in operationalising a technology selection framework , 2006 .

[20]  A. Mehrabadi,et al.  Practical strategies to improve harvestable biomass energy yield in microalgal culture: A review , 2021 .

[21]  José Luis Míguez,et al.  Use of grey relational analysis to assess and optimize small biomass boilers , 2006 .

[22]  K. Maniya,et al.  A selection of material using a novel type decision-making method: Preference selection index method , 2010 .

[23]  P. Lamers,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of a biomass depot , 2017 .

[24]  Christopher M. Saffron,et al.  Comparing pelletization and torrefaction depots: optimization of depot capacity and biomass moisture to determine the minimum production cost. , 2016 .

[25]  Taraneh Sowlati,et al.  Biomass logistics: A review of important features, optimization modeling and the new trends , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[26]  Mark Jaccard,et al.  The renewable portfolio standard:: design considerations and an implementation survey , 2001 .

[27]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Material selection using preferential ranking methods , 2012 .

[28]  Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno,et al.  Biomass as Renewable Energy: Worldwide Research Trends , 2019, Sustainability.

[29]  S. Mahajani,et al.  Production and utilization of fuel pellets from biomass: A review , 2018, Fuel Processing Technology.

[30]  Patrick Lamers,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of decentralized biomass processing depots. , 2015, Bioresource technology.

[31]  Ju Xiao,et al.  Optimization of a biomass briquette fuel system based on grey relational analysis and analytic hierarchy process: A study using cornstalks in China , 2015 .

[32]  Rex T.L. Ng,et al.  Design of biofuel supply chains with variable regional depot and biorefinery locations , 2017 .

[33]  Mohammad Marufuzzaman,et al.  Two-stage stochastic programming supply chain model for biodiesel production via wastewater treatment , 2014, Comput. Oper. Res..

[34]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods , 2009 .

[35]  L. Felix,et al.  Laboratory pelletization of hydrochar from woody biomass , 2014 .

[36]  R. Engelken,et al.  Optimization of pelleting parameters for producing composite pellets using agricultural and agro-processing wastes by Taguchi-Grey relational analysis , 2020 .

[37]  Biomass or Biomess? The promises and Limits of Bioenergy , 2008 .

[38]  Sibel Irmak Biomass as Raw Material for Production of High‐Value Products , 2017 .

[39]  Taraneh Sowlati,et al.  Economic sensitivity of wood biomass utilization for greenhouse heating application , 2009 .

[40]  P. Flynn,et al.  The relative cost of biomass energy transport , 2007, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[41]  V. Vassilev,et al.  Advantages and disadvantages of composition and properties of biomass in comparison with coal: An overview , 2015 .

[42]  S. Mekhilef,et al.  A review on biomass as a fuel for boilers , 2011 .

[43]  Ilias P. Tatsiopoulos,et al.  An optimization model for multi-biomass tri-generation energy supply , 2009 .

[44]  Samir Elhedhli,et al.  Integrated design of supply chain networks with three echelons, multiple commodities and technology selection , 2008 .

[45]  Geoffrey P. Hammond,et al.  Barriers to and drivers for UK bioenergy development , 2011 .

[46]  Peter McKendry,et al.  Energy production from biomass (Part 1): Overview of biomass. , 2002, Bioresource technology.

[47]  Liu Sifeng,et al.  Extension of grey superiority analysis , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.