Adaptive clinical trial designs for phase I cancer studies

Adaptive clinical trials are becoming increasingly popular research designs for clinical investigation. Adaptive designs are particularly useful in phase I cancer studies where clinical data are scant and the goals are to assess the drug dose-toxicity profile and to determine the maximum tolerated dose while minimizing the number of study patients treated at suboptimal dose levels. In the current work we give an overview of adaptive design methods for phase I cancer trials. We find that modern statistical literature is replete with novel adaptive designs that have clearly defined objectives and established statistical properties, and are shown to outperform conventional dose finding methods such as the 3+3 design, both in terms of statistical efficiency and in terms of minimizing the number of patients treated at highly toxic or nonefficacious doses. We discuss statistical, logistical, and regulatory aspects of these designs and present some links to non-commercial statistical software for implementing these methods in practice. MSC 2010 subject classifications: Primary 62L05, 62L10, 62L12; secondary 62L20.

[1]  Jin Zhang,et al.  Adaptive prior variance calibration in the Bayesian continual reassessment method. , 2013, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  Nancy Flournoy,et al.  Up-and-down designs. I. Stationary treatment distributions , 1995 .

[3]  John O'Quigley,et al.  Dose-finding design for multi-drug combinations , 2011, Clinical trials.

[4]  S Chevret,et al.  The continual reassessment method in cancer phase I clinical trials: a simulation study. , 1993, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  Michael Branson,et al.  A Bayesian Case Study in Oncology Phase I Combination Dose-Finding Using Logistic Regression with Covariates , 2009, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[7]  Arzu Onar-Thomas,et al.  A simulation-based comparison of the traditional method, Rolling-6 design and a frequentist version of the continual reassessment method with special attention to trial duration in pediatric Phase I oncology trials. , 2010, Contemporary clinical trials.

[8]  Daniel Normolle,et al.  Phase I trial using a time-to-event continual reassessment strategy for dose escalation of cisplatin combined with gemcitabine and radiation therapy in pancreatic cancer. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Peter F Thall,et al.  Bayesian Models and Decision Algorithms for Complex Early Phase Clinical Trials. , 2010, Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics.

[10]  William F. Rosenberger,et al.  Toxicity in sequential dose-response experiments , 1995 .

[11]  Nolan A. Wages,et al.  pocrm: An R-package for Phase I trials of combinations of agents , 2013, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[12]  Michael Branson,et al.  Critical aspects of the Bayesian approach to phase I cancer trials , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  Joseph D. Warfield,et al.  A Semiparametric Sequential Algorithm for Estimation of Dose–Response Curve , 2013 .

[14]  A. Venook,et al.  Design Issues in Dose-Finding Phase I Trials for Combinations of Two Agents , 2009, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[15]  Zheng Su A class of designs for Phase I cancer clinical trials combining Bayesian and likelihood approaches , 2011 .

[16]  Nathan L Pace,et al.  Advances in and Limitations of Up-and-down Methodology: A Précis of Clinical Use, Study Design, and Dose Estimation in Anesthesia Research , 2007, Anesthesiology.

[17]  B E Storer,et al.  Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials. , 1989, Biometrics.

[18]  M. Tighiouart,et al.  Number of Patients per Cohort and Sample Size Considerations Using Dose Escalation with Overdose Control , 2012 .

[19]  Assaf P Oron,et al.  The k‐in‐a‐row up‐and‐down design, revisited , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  M. Ratain,et al.  Dose-escalation models for combination phase I trials in oncology. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[21]  Stochastic approximation with virtual observations for dose-finding on discrete levels. , 2010, Biometrika.

[22]  Chinying J. Wang,et al.  Designs foe phase i cancer clinical trials with differentiation of graded toxicity , 2000 .

[23]  John O'Quigley,et al.  Theoretical study of the continual reassessment method , 2006 .

[24]  Ethan Reiner,et al.  Operating characteristics of the standard phase I clinical trial design , 1999 .

[25]  Jay Bartroff,et al.  Approximate Dynamic Programming and Its Applications to the Design of Phase I Cancer Trials , 2010, 1011.6509.

[26]  John O'Quigley,et al.  Performance of two-stage continual reassessment method relative to an optimal benchmark , 2013, Clinical trials.

[27]  Mourad Tighiouart,et al.  Escalation with Overdose Control Using Ordinal Toxicity Grades for Cancer Phase I Clinical Trials , 2012 .

[28]  Ying Kuen Cheung,et al.  On the Use of Nonparametric Curves in Phase I Trials with Low Toxicity Tolerance , 2002, Biometrics.

[29]  H. Iwata,et al.  Practical Application of the Continual Reassessment Method to a Phase I Dose-Finding Trial in Advanced Breast Cancer , 2007 .

[30]  Alexia Iasonos,et al.  A Comprehensive Comparison of the Continual Reassessment Method to the Standard 3 + 3 Dose Escalation Scheme in Phase I Dose-Finding Studies , 2008, Clinical trials.

[31]  Jay Bartroff,et al.  Incorporating Individual and Collective Ethics into Phase I Cancer Trial Designs , 2011, Biometrics.

[32]  John O'Quigley,et al.  Using the time‐to‐event continual reassessment method in the presence of partial orders , 2013, Statistics in medicine.

[33]  J O'Quigley,et al.  Posterior maximization and averaging for Bayesian working model choice in the continual reassessment method , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[34]  Peter F Thall,et al.  Dose‐Finding with Two Agents in Phase I Oncology Trials , 2003, Biometrics.

[35]  Nancy Flournoy,et al.  Comparison of Isotonic Designs for Dose-Finding , 2009, Statistics in biopharmaceutical research.

[36]  Ethan Reiner,et al.  A stopping rule for the continual reassessment method , 1998 .

[37]  B. L. Lee,et al.  A Two-Dimensional Search Algorithm for Dose-Finding Trials of Two Agents , 2012, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[38]  Michael Proschan,et al.  Estimating the probability of toxicity at the target dose following an up‐and‐down design , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[39]  Bradley P Carlin,et al.  A trivariate continual reassessment method for phase I/II trials of toxicity, efficacy, and surrogate efficacy. , 2012, Statistics in medicine.

[40]  John O'Quigley,et al.  Continual Reassessment and Related Dose-Finding Designs. , 2010, Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics.

[41]  Ying Kuen Cheung,et al.  Coherence principles in dose-finding studies , 2005 .

[42]  Nancy Flournoy,et al.  Quantile estimation following non-parametric phase I clinical trials with ordinal response. , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[43]  Seung-Ho Kang,et al.  An Investigation of the Traditional Algorithm-Based Designs for Phase 1 Cancer Clinical Trials , 2002 .

[44]  Anastasia Ivanova,et al.  Escalation, group and A + B designs for dose‐finding trials , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[45]  David Azriel A note on the robustness of the continual reassessment method , 2012 .

[46]  Shing M. Lee,et al.  Model calibration in the continual reassessment method , 2009, Clinical trials.

[47]  M. Tighiouart,et al.  Dose Finding with Escalation with Overdose Control (EWOC) in Cancer Clinical Trials , 2010 .

[48]  Ying Kuen Cheung,et al.  A Simple Technique to Evaluate Model Sensitivity in the Continual Reassessment Method , 2002, Biometrics.

[49]  Peter F Thall,et al.  Simultaneously optimizing dose and schedule of a new cytotoxic agent , 2007, Clinical trials.

[50]  Yinghui Zhou,et al.  Practical Implementation of Bayesian Dose-Escalation Procedures , 2003 .

[51]  Jianfen Shu,et al.  Dose‐escalation designs in oncology: ADEPT and the CRM , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[52]  B. Nebiyou Bekele,et al.  Dose-Finding Based on Multiple Toxicities in a Soft Tissue Sarcoma Trial , 2004 .

[53]  W Sauerwein,et al.  A scheme for a dose‐escalation study when the event is lagged , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[54]  T. Braun,et al.  The adaptive accelerated biased coin design for phase I clinical trials , 2011 .

[55]  William F Rosenberger,et al.  Competing designs for phase I clinical trials: a review , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[56]  D H Leung,et al.  Isotonic designs for phase I trials. , 2001, Controlled clinical trials.

[57]  Nancy Flournoy,et al.  Group up-and-down designs for dose-finding , 2006 .

[58]  John O'Quigley,et al.  Consistency of continual reassessment method under model misspecification , 1996 .

[59]  S. Piantadosi,et al.  Practical implementation of a modified continual reassessment method for dose-finding trials , 1998, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[60]  D. Follmann,et al.  The Accelerated Biased Coin Up-and-Down Design in Phase I Trials , 2004, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[61]  Douglas M Potter,et al.  Adaptive dose finding for phase I clinical trials of drugs used for chemotherapy of cancer , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[62]  Alessandra Giovagnoli,et al.  Randomized group up and down experiments , 2008 .

[63]  Nancy Flournoy,et al.  An adaptive design for maximization of a contingent binary response , 1995 .

[64]  Xavier Paoletti,et al.  np1: A computer program for dose escalation strategies in phase I clinical trials , 2007, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[65]  Anastasia Ivanova,et al.  Improved up‐and‐down designs for phase I trials , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[66]  Derivation of Exact Distributions Following an Up-and-Down Design , 2009 .

[67]  Xavier Paoletti,et al.  Design efficiency in dose finding studies , 2004, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[68]  John Whitehead,et al.  A Bayesian dose‐finding procedure for phase I clinical trials based only on the assumption of monotonicity , 2010, Statistics in medicine.

[69]  G. Yin,et al.  Bayesian Dose Finding for Combined Drugs with Discrete and Continuous Doses. , 2012, Bayesian analysis.

[70]  J O'Quigley,et al.  Continual reassessment method: a likelihood approach. , 1996, Biometrics.

[71]  A Rogatko,et al.  Patient specific dosing in a cancer phase I clinical trial , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[72]  Peter F Thall,et al.  Monitoring late-onset toxicities in phase I trials using predicted risks. , 2008, Biostatistics.

[73]  Valerii V. Fedorov,et al.  Optimal Design for Nonlinear Response Models , 2013 .

[74]  John O'Quigley,et al.  Extended model‐based designs for more complex dose‐finding studies , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[75]  Guosheng Yin,et al.  Escalation with overdose control for phase I drug‐combination trials , 2013, Statistics in medicine.

[76]  Alexia Iasonos,et al.  Interplay of priors and skeletons in two‐stage continual reassessment method , 2012, Statistics in medicine.

[77]  Shelemyahu Zacks,et al.  Optimal Bayesian-feasible dose escalation for cancer phase I trials , 1998 .

[78]  Alexia Iasonos,et al.  Estimating the dose–toxicity curve in completed phase I studies , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[79]  J O'Quigley,et al.  Two-sample continual reassessment method. , 1999, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[80]  S. Chevret,et al.  Methods for dose finding studies in cancer clinical trials: a review and results of a Monte Carlo study. , 1991, Statistics in medicine.

[81]  Weichung Joe Shih,et al.  Unifying CRM and EWOC designs for phase I cancer clinical trials , 2009 .

[82]  Vladimir Dragalin Seamless Phase I/II Designs , 2010 .

[83]  B E Storer,et al.  Small-sample confidence sets for the MTD in a phase I clinical trial. , 1993, Biometrics.

[84]  S. Chevret,et al.  Statistical methods for dose-finding experiments , 2006 .

[85]  H. Quan,et al.  Statistical Properties of a Modified Accelerated Design for Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials , 2007 .

[86]  Mourad Tighiouart,et al.  Translation of innovative designs into phase I trials. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[87]  D. Faries,et al.  Practical modifications of the continual reassessment method for phase I cancer clinical trials. , 1994, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[88]  N. Ishizuka,et al.  The continual reassessment method and its applications: a Bayesian methodology for phase I cancer clinical trials , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[89]  Katrin Roth,et al.  Sequential Designs for Dose Escalation Studies in Oncology , 2012, Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput..

[90]  Jeffrey R. Eisele,et al.  A Curve‐Free Method for Phase I Clinical Trials , 2000, Biometrics.

[91]  Anastasia Ivanova,et al.  Two‐Dimensional Dose Finding in Discrete Dose Space , 2005, Biometrics.

[92]  C. F. Wu,et al.  Efficient Sequential Designs with Binary Data , 1985 .

[93]  J O'Quigley,et al.  Estimating the probability of toxicity at the recommended dose following a phase I clinical trial in cancer. , 1992, Biometrics.

[94]  Junfeng Sun,et al.  Range and trend of expected toxicity level (ETL) in standard A + B designs: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. , 2009, Contemporary clinical trials.

[95]  André Rogatko,et al.  Individualized patient dosing in phase I clinical trials: the role of escalation with overdose control in PNU-214936. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[96]  Hui Quan,et al.  A model‐based approach in the estimation of the maximum tolerated dose in phase I cancer clinical trials , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[97]  K. Mengersen,et al.  Adaptive Bayesian compound designs for dose finding studies , 2012 .

[98]  Sarah Zohar,et al.  Phase I (or Phase II) Dose-Ranging Clinical Trials: Proposal of a Two-Stage Bayesian Design , 2003, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[99]  H. Sung,et al.  Dose‐Finding Based on Feasibility and Toxicity in T‐cell Infusion Trials , 2001, Biometrics.

[100]  J O'Quigley,et al.  Dose‐Finding Designs for HIV Studies , 2001, Biometrics.

[101]  Jin Zhang,et al.  A Phase I Bayesian Adaptive Design to Simultaneously Optimize Dose and Schedule Assignments Both Between and Within Patients , 2013, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[102]  Ying Kuen Cheung,et al.  Dose Finding by the Continual Reassessment Method , 2011 .

[103]  B. Carlin,et al.  Adaptive design improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[104]  Yuan Ji,et al.  A modified toxicity probability interval method for dose-finding trials. , 2010, Clinical trials.

[105]  A New Look at Evaluating MTD Designs in Cancer Research , 2009 .

[106]  Ying Yuan,et al.  Bayesian Model Averaging Continual Reassessment Method in Phase I Clinical Trials , 2009 .

[107]  W. J. Studden,et al.  Theory Of Optimal Experiments , 1972 .

[108]  C. Ahn,et al.  An evaluation of phase I cancer clinical trial designs , 1998 .

[109]  Michael J. Sweeting,et al.  bcrm: Bayesian Continual Reassessment Method Designs for Phase I Dose-Finding Trials , 2013 .

[110]  P. Workman,et al.  The impact of pharmacokinetically guided dose escalation strategies in phase I clinical trials: critical evaluation and recommendations for future studies. , 1992, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[111]  Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer,et al.  The continual reassessment method for dose-finding studies: a tutorial , 2006, Clinical trials.

[112]  D. Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Proportional odds model for dose‐finding clinical trial designs with ordinal toxicity grading , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[113]  M. Polley Practical modifications to the time‐to‐event continual reassessment method for phase I cancer trials with fast patient accrual and late‐onset toxicities , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[114]  J Whitehead,et al.  Bayesian decision procedures for dose determining experiments. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[115]  John O'Quigley,et al.  Retrospective Analysis of Sequential Dose‐Finding Designs , 2005, Biometrics.

[116]  Alessandra Giovagnoli,et al.  Up-and-down experiments of first and second order , 2005 .

[117]  S. Cha,et al.  Phase 1 Oncology Clinical Trials for Related Subpopulations: The Power Walk Design , 2002 .

[118]  Ying Yuan,et al.  Bayesian dose finding in oncology for drug combinations by copula regression , 2009 .

[119]  Thomas M Braun,et al.  A Hierarchical Bayesian Design for Phase I Trials of Novel Combinations of Cancer Therapeutic Agents , 2010, Biometrics.

[120]  Jing Ning,et al.  Up-and-down designs for phase I clinical trials. , 2013, Contemporary clinical trials.

[121]  B. Vidakovic,et al.  Patient-Specific Dose Adjustment in the Cancer Clinical Trial Setting , 2008, Pharmaceutical Medicine.

[122]  Yuan Ji,et al.  Dose-finding in phase I clinical trials based on toxicity probability intervals , 2007, Clinical trials.

[123]  Thomas M Braun,et al.  A Generalized Continual Reassessment Method for Two-Agent Phase I Trials , 2013, Statistics in biopharmaceutical research.

[124]  Zhilong Yuan,et al.  Isotonic designs for phase I cancer clinical trials with multiple risk groups , 2004, Clinical trials.

[125]  David Azriel,et al.  Dose-Finding Designs: The Role of Convergence Properties , 2011, The international journal of biostatistics.

[126]  Guosheng Yin,et al.  Two-stage dose finding for cytostatic agents in phase I oncology trials. , 2013, Statistics in medicine.

[127]  J. Lee,et al.  Dose Escalation Methods in Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[128]  R. Chappell,et al.  The Continual Reassessment Method for Multiple Toxicity Grades: A Bayesian Quasi‐Likelihood Approach , 2007, Biometrics.

[129]  Ying Kuen Cheung,et al.  Sample size formulae for the Bayesian continual reassessment method , 2013, Clinical trials.

[130]  Satoshi Morita,et al.  Application of the continual reassessment method to a phase I dose‐finding trial in Japanese patients: East meets West , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[131]  William F. Rosenberger,et al.  Asymptotic normality of maximum likelihood estimators from multiparameter response-driven designs , 1997 .

[132]  D. L. McLeish,et al.  Sequential Designs in Bioassay , 1990 .

[133]  Oke Gerke,et al.  Optimal phase I dose‐escalation trial designs in oncology—A simulation study , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[134]  Anastasia Ivanova,et al.  Bivariate isotonic design for dose‐finding with ordered groups , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[135]  R Simon,et al.  Accelerated titration designs for phase I clinical trials in oncology. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[136]  Nancy Flournoy,et al.  Cumulative cohort design for dose-finding , 2007 .

[137]  John O'Quigley,et al.  Non-parametric optimal design in dose finding studies. , 2002, Biostatistics.

[138]  Yuan Ji,et al.  Modified toxicity probability interval design: a safer and more reliable method than the 3 + 3 design for practical phase I trials. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[139]  Ying Kuen Cheung,et al.  Calibration of prior variance in the Bayesian continual reassessment method , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[140]  Nancy Flournoy,et al.  UP-AND-DOWN DESIGNS II: EXACT TREATMENT MOMENTS , 1995 .

[141]  Sarah Zohar,et al.  An approach to meta‐analysis of dose‐finding studies , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[142]  John O'Quigley,et al.  Continual Reassessment Method for Partial Ordering , 2011, Biometrics.

[143]  Y K Cheung,et al.  Sequential Designs for Phase I Clinical Trials with Late‐Onset Toxicities , 2000, Biometrics.

[144]  G. Wassmer,et al.  Comments on the Draft Guidance on “Adaptive Design Clinical Trials for Drugs and Biologics” of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration , 2010, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[145]  Sarah Zohar,et al.  Software to compute and conduct sequential Bayesian phase I or II dose-ranging clinical trials with stopping rules , 2003, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[146]  Ying Yuan,et al.  A Latent Contingency Table Approach to Dose Finding for Combinations of Two Agents , 2009, Biometrics.

[147]  Yosef Rinott,et al.  The Treatment Versus Experimentation Dilemma in Dose-finding Studies , 2011 .

[148]  Mårten Vågerö,et al.  The distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator in up-and-down experiments for quantal dose-response data. , 1999, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[149]  Edward L Korn,et al.  Dose escalation trial designs based on a molecularly targeted endpoint , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[150]  M. Ghielmini,et al.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the new taxane analog BMS-184476 given weekly in patients with advanced malignancies. , 2002, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[151]  Jeffrey S Barrett,et al.  Shortening the timeline of pediatric phase I trials: the rolling six design. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[152]  Nancy Flournoy,et al.  Random Walks for Quantile Estimation , 1994 .

[153]  W J Shih,et al.  Statistical properties of the traditional algorithm-based designs for phase I cancer clinical trials. , 2001, Biostatistics.

[154]  J. Whitehead,et al.  Bayesian decision procedures with application to dose-finding studies , 1997 .

[155]  J O'Quigley,et al.  Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer. , 1990, Biometrics.

[156]  A Kramar,et al.  Continual reassessment methods in phase I trials of the combination of two drugs in oncology. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[157]  J. Longmate,et al.  Toxicity equivalence range design (TEQR): a practical Phase I design. , 2011, Contemporary clinical trials.

[158]  Ying Kuen Cheung,et al.  Continual reassessment method with multiple toxicity constraints. , 2011, Biostatistics.

[159]  O. Wang,et al.  A TWO-STAGE DOSE SELECTION STRATEGY IN PHASE I TRIALS WITH WIDE DOSE RANGES , 2000, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[160]  Ying Yuan,et al.  Robust EM Continual Reassessment Method in Oncology Dose Finding , 2011, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[161]  P F Thall,et al.  Practical model-based dose-finding in phase I clinical trials: Methods based on toxicity , 2003, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[162]  H. Robbins A Stochastic Approximation Method , 1951 .

[163]  L. Haines,et al.  Bayesian Optimal Designs for Phase I Clinical Trials , 2003, Biometrics.

[164]  Mourad Tighiouart,et al.  EWOC 2.0: Interactive Software for Dose Escalation in Cancer Phase I Clinical Trials , 2007 .

[165]  V. Fedorov,et al.  Adaptive designs for dose-finding based on efficacy–toxicity response , 2006 .

[166]  Anastasia Ivanova,et al.  A New Dose‐Finding Design for Bivariate Outcomes , 2003, Biometrics.

[167]  Yisheng Li,et al.  Bayesian dose finding in phase I clinical trials based on a new statistical framework , 2007 .

[168]  Thomas M Braun,et al.  Generalizing the TITE‐CRM to adapt for early‐ and late‐onset toxicities , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[169]  T. Braun,et al.  Beyond the 3+3 method: expanded algorithms for dose- escalation in Phase I oncology trials of two agents , 2011, Clinical trials.

[170]  J R Murphy,et al.  A logistic dose-ranging method for phase I clinical investigations trials. , 1997, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[171]  Mehmet Kocak,et al.  Continual Reassessment Method vs. Traditional Empirically Based Design: Modifications Motivated by Phase I Trials in Pediatric Oncology by the Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium , 2009, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[172]  Gregory J Hather,et al.  Some Notable Properties of the Standard Oncology Phase I Design , 2008, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[173]  J Whitehead,et al.  Bayesian decision procedures based on logistic regression models for dose-finding studies. , 1998, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[174]  L V Rubinstein,et al.  A comparison of two phase I trial designs. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[175]  S Zohar,et al.  Experimental designs for phase I and phase I/II dose-finding studies , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[176]  An optimization algorithm for designing phase I cancer clinical trials. , 2008, Contemporary clinical trials.

[177]  Nancy Flournoy,et al.  Dose Finding Using the Biased Coin Up‐and‐Down Design and Isotonic Regression , 2002, Biometrics.

[178]  Alexander M. Mood,et al.  A Method for Obtaining and Analyzing Sensitivity Data , 1948 .

[179]  S. Goodman,et al.  Some practical improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[180]  M. Tighiouart,et al.  Dose‐Escalation with Overdose Control , 2006 .

[181]  Ying Yuan,et al.  Bayesian hybrid dose‐finding design in phase I oncology clinical trials , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[182]  B. Chabner,et al.  Pharmacologically guided phase I clinical trials based upon preclinical drug development. , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[183]  S Zohar,et al.  The continual reassessment method: comparison of Bayesian stopping rules for dose‐ranging studies , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[184]  J. Babb,et al.  Flexible Bayesian methods for cancer phase I clinical trials. Dose escalation with overdose control , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[185]  Peter F Thall,et al.  Using Joint Utilities of the Times to Response and Toxicity to Adaptively Optimize Schedule–Dose Regimes , 2013, Biometrics.

[186]  R. Chappell,et al.  Three‐dose–cohort designs in cancer phase I trials , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[187]  Daniel Normolle,et al.  Designing dose-escalation trials with late-onset toxicities using the time-to-event continual reassessment method. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[188]  S Zohar,et al.  Dose‐finding approach for dose escalation with overdose control considering incomplete observations , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[189]  Ying Yuan,et al.  Sequential continual reassessment method for two‐dimensional dose finding , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[190]  D. Anbar,et al.  Stochastic approximation methods and their use in bioassay and phase i clinical trials , 1984 .

[191]  S. Durham,et al.  A random walk rule for phase I clinical trials. , 1997, Biometrics.

[192]  Ying Kuen Cheung,et al.  Stochastic Approximation and Modern Model-based Designs for Dose-Finding Clinical Trials. , 2010, Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics.

[193]  Yinghui Zhou,et al.  Choosing the Number of Doses and the Cohort Size for Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Studies , 2005 .

[194]  Assaf P Oron,et al.  Small-sample behavior of novel phase I cancer trial designs , 2012, Clinical trials.

[195]  M. Tighiouart,et al.  Incorporating a Patient Dichotomous Characteristic in Cancer Phase I Clinical Trials Using Escalation with Overdose Control , 2012 .

[196]  Sequential Designs for Logistic Phase I Clinical Trials , 2006, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[197]  Tze Leung Lai,et al.  Approximate Policy Optimization and Adaptive Control in Regression Models , 2005 .

[198]  Shyamal D Peddada,et al.  Designs for Single‐ or Multiple‐Agent Phase I Trials , 2004, Biometrics.

[199]  M. Conaway,et al.  Specifications of a continual reassessment method design for phase I trials of combined drugs , 2013, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[200]  Yuan Ji,et al.  Bayesian Continual Reassessment Method for Dose-Finding Trials Infusing T Cells with Limited Sample Size , 2012, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[201]  John O'Quigley,et al.  Continual reassessment designs with early termination. , 2002, Biostatistics.

[202]  John O'Quigley,et al.  Continual Reassessment Method for Ordered Groups , 2003, Biometrics.

[203]  John O'Quigley,et al.  Curve‐Free and Model‐Based Continual Reassessment Method Designs , 2002, Biometrics.

[204]  Alessandra Giovagnoli,et al.  Properties of frequency distributions induced by general ‘up-and-down’ methods for estimating quantiles , 1998 .

[205]  Ying Kuen Cheung,et al.  Sequential Implementation of Stepwise Procedures for Identifying the Maximum Tolerated Dose , 2007 .

[206]  S. Ghosal,et al.  Convergence properties of sequential Bayesian D-optimal designs , 2009 .

[207]  J. Willson,et al.  Using toxicity grades in the design and analysis of cancer phase I clinical trials. , 1992, Statistics in medicine.

[208]  Mourad Tighiouart,et al.  Dose escalation with overdose control using a quasi-continuous toxicity score in cancer Phase I clinical trials. , 2012, Contemporary clinical trials.

[209]  Seung-Ho Kang,et al.  The Expected Toxicity Rate at the Maximum Tolerated Dose in the Standard Phase I Cancer Clinical Trial Design , 2001 .

[210]  J O'Quigley,et al.  Another look at two phase I clinical trial designs. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[211]  S. Møller,et al.  An extension of the continual reassessment methods using a preliminary up-and-down design in a dose finding study in cancer patients, in order to investigate a greater range of doses. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[212]  S Zacks,et al.  Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[213]  John O'Quigley,et al.  Phase I design for completely or partially ordered treatment schedules , 2014, Statistics in medicine.