Parameterizing the Logistic Model of Tumor Growth by DW-MRI and DCE-MRI Data to Predict Treatment Response and Changes in Breast Cancer Cellularity during Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of 28 patients were obtained pretreatment, after one cycle, and after completion of all cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). For each patient at each time point, the tumor cell number was estimated using the apparent diffusion coefficient and the extravascular extracellular (v e) and plasma volume (v p) fractions. The proliferation/death rate was obtained using the number of tumor cells from the first two time points in conjunction with the logistic model of tumor growth, which was then used to predict tumor cellularity at the conclusion of NAC. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the predicted and the experimental number of tumor cells measured at the end of NAC was 0.81 (P = .0043). The proliferation rate estimated after the first cycle of therapy was able to separate patients who went on to achieve pathologic complete response from those who did not (P = .021) with a sensitivity and specificity of 82.4% and 72.7%, respectively. These data provide preliminary results indicating that incorporating readily available quantitative MRI data into a simple model of tumor growth can lead to potentially clinically relevant information for predicting an individual patient's response to NAC.

[1]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Image Guided Personalization of Reaction-Diffusion Type Tumor Growth Models Using Modified Anisotropic Eikonal Equations , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Saadallah Ramadan,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: principles and clinical applications. , 2011, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[3]  Anna L. Brown,et al.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  T. Hirai,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of metastatic brain tumors: comparison with histologic type and tumor cellularity. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[5]  Gargi Chakraborty,et al.  Quantitative metrics of net proliferation and invasion link biological aggressiveness assessed by MRI with hypoxia assessed by FMISO-PET in newly diagnosed glioblastomas. , 2009, Cancer research.

[6]  Andreas Makris,et al.  Early Changes in Functional Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predict for Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Primary Breast Cancer , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[7]  T. Bathen,et al.  Diffusion‐weighted and dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in evaluation of early treatment effects during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  J. C. Gore,et al.  Incorporation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data into a simple mathematical model of tumor growth , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  P. LaViolette,et al.  Validation of functional diffusion maps (fDMs) as a biomarker for human glioma cellularity , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  Thomas E Yankeelov,et al.  Variation of the relaxographic “shutter‐speed” for transcytolemmal water exchange affects the CR bolus‐tracking curve shape , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  G. Bonadonna,et al.  Primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: eight-year experience at the Milan Cancer Institute. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Olav Haraldseth,et al.  Measurement of cell density and necrotic fraction in human melanoma xenografts by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Thomas E Yankeelov,et al.  Integration of quantitative DCE-MRI and ADC mapping to monitor treatment response in human breast cancer: initial results. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  L. Esserman,et al.  Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL. , 2012, Radiology.

[15]  U. Sharma,et al.  Longitudinal study of the assessment by MRI and diffusion‐weighted imaging of tumor response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2009, NMR in biomedicine.

[16]  J. E. Tanner,et al.  Spin diffusion measurements : spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient , 1965 .

[17]  Thomas E Yankeelov,et al.  A novel AIF tracking method and comparison of DCE-MRI parameters using individual and population-based AIFs in human breast cancer , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Toshinori Hirai,et al.  Usefulness of diffusion‐weighted MRI with echo‐planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  Benjamin M Ellingson,et al.  Spatially quantifying microscopic tumor invasion and proliferation using a voxel‐wise solution to a glioma growth model and serial diffusion MRI , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  J. M. Taylor,et al.  Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: an early surrogate marker of therapeutic efficacy in brain tumors. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  Thomas E Yankeelov,et al.  Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Oncology: Theory, Data Acquisition, Analysis, and Examples. , 2007, Current medical imaging reviews.

[22]  L. D. Pillis,et al.  A Validated Mathematical Model of Cell-Mediated Immune Response to Tumor Growth , 2005 .

[23]  Mauro Ferrari,et al.  Multiparameter computational modeling of tumor invasion. , 2009, Cancer research.

[24]  R Cancedda,et al.  Computer-based technique for cell aggregation analysis and cell aggregation in in vitro chondrogenesis. , 1997, Cytometry.

[25]  Peter Gibbs,et al.  Diffusion changes precede size reduction in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[26]  Piotr Kozlowski,et al.  Comparison between population average and experimentally measured arterial input function in predicting biopsy results in prostate cancer. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[27]  Wei Huang,et al.  Feasibility of using limited‐population‐based arterial input function for pharmacokinetic modeling of osteosarcoma dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI data , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  B K Rutt,et al.  Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[29]  W. Rooney,et al.  Determination of the MRI contrast agent concentration time course in vivo following bolus injection: Effect of equilibrium transcytolemmal water exchange , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  Michael Berens,et al.  A mathematical model of glioblastoma tumor spheroid invasion in a three-dimensional in vitro experiment. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[31]  P. Tofts Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd‐DTPA MR imaging , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[32]  Thomas E Yankeelov,et al.  Integration of diffusion‐weighted MRI data and a simple mathematical model to predict breast tumor cellularity during neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  J C Gore,et al.  Effects of cell volume fraction changes on apparent diffusion in human cells. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[34]  Steinar Lundgren,et al.  Predicting survival and early clinical response to primary chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced breast cancer using DCE‐MRI , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.