Initial Design and Quick Analysis of SAW Ultra–Wideband HFM Transducers

This paper presents techniques for initial design and quick fundamental and harmonic operation analysis of surface acoustic waves ultra-wideband hyperbolically frequency modulated (HFM) interdigital transducer (IDT). The primary analysis is based on the quasi–static method. Quasi–electrostatic charge's density distribution was approximated by Chebyshev polynomials and the method of Green’s function. It assesses the non uniform charge distribution of electrodes, electric field interaction and the end effects of a whole transducer. It was found that numerical integration (e.g. Romberg, Gauss–Chebyshev) requires a lot of machine time for calculation of the Chebyshev polynomial and the Green’s function convolution when integration includes coordinates of a large number of neighboring electrodes. In order to accelerate the charge density calculation, the analytic expressions are derived. Evaluation of HFM transducer fundamental and harmonics' operation amplitude response with simulation single– dispersive interdigital chirp filter structure is presented. Elapsed time of 2000 frequency response point simulations of HFM IDT with 589 electrodes is only 54 seconds (0.027 s/point) on PC with CPU Intel Core I7–4770S. Amplitude response is compared with linear frequency modulated (LFM) IDT response. It was determined that the HFM transducer characteristic is less distorted in comparison with LFM transducer.

[1]  Peter Willett,et al.  Range Bias Modeling for Hyperbolic-Frequency-Modulated Waveforms in Target Tracking , 2012 .

[2]  David Morgan,et al.  Surface Acoustic Wave Filters: With Applications to Electronic Communications and Signal Processing , 2007 .

[3]  V. Plessky,et al.  Hyperbolically frequency modulated transducer in SAW sensors and tags , 2013 .

[4]  S.V. Biryukov,et al.  The electrostatic problem for the SAW interdigital transducers in an external electric field. I. A general solution for a limited number of electrodes , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[5]  W. Pedler,et al.  Fundamental- and Harmonic-Frequency Circuit-Model Analysis of Lnterdigital Transducers with Arbitralry Metallization Ratios and Polarity Sequences , 1975 .

[6]  Electrostatics of interdigital transducers , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[7]  D.R. Gallagher,et al.  Orthogonal frequency coded filters for use in ultra-wideband communication systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  Marc Solal,et al.  Numerical methods for SAW propagation characterization , 1998, 1998 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings (Cat. No. 98CH36102).

[9]  A. Kozlov,et al.  Optimization of broadband uniform beam profile interdigital transducers weighted by assignment of electrode polarities , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  V. Plessky,et al.  Ultra-wide-band SAW RFID/sensors , 2014, 2014 European Frequency and Time Forum (EFTF).

[11]  S. Harma,et al.  Feasibility of ultra-wideband SAW RFID tags meeting FCC rules , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  P. Ventura,et al.  Rigorous analysis of finite SAW devices with arbitrary electrode geometries , 1995, 1995 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium.

[13]  He Shitang,et al.  Fast FEM/BEM Simulation of non-periodic SAW structures , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[14]  Low loss and wide band filters using new dispersive interdigital transducers with floating electrodes , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS).