EXPERIMENTAL BRUCELLA ABORTUS INFECTION IN WOLVES

Four juvenile male wolves (Canis lupus) each received an oral dose of 1.6–1.7×1012 colony-forming units of Brucella abortus biovar 1 isolated from a bison (Bison bison) in Wood Buffalo National Park (Canada), and two others served as negative controls. Infected wolves did not show clinical signs of disease but did develop high Brucella antibody titers. Small numbers of B. abortus were excreted sporadically in feces until day 50 postinoculation (PI). Very small numbers of the bacterium were isolated from urine of only one wolf late on the same day that it was infected, and very small numbers of colonies of B. abortus were obtained from buccal swabs of three wolves for up to 48 hr PI. Two infected wolves euthanized 6 mo after the start of the experiment had no lesions, and colonies of B. abortus were isolated from thymus and most major lymph nodes. The other two infected wolves euthanized 12 mo after the start of the experiment had no lesions, and smaller numbers of brucellae were recovered from fewer lymph nodes compared with the wolves killed 6 mo earlier. The sporadic excretion of very small numbers of brucellae by the wolves was insignificant when compared with the infective dose for cattle.

[1]  S. Tessaro,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON BRUCELLA ABORTUS IN MOOSE (ALCES ALCES) , 1996, Journal of wildlife diseases.

[2]  S. Tessaro,et al.  The brucellosis and tuberculosis status of wood bison in the Mackenzie Bison Sanctuary, Northwest Territories, Canada. , 1993, Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire.

[3]  L. Forbes.  Brucella abortus infection in 14 farm dogs. , 1990, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[4]  S. Tessaro,et al.  A survey of brucellosis and tuberculosis in bison in and around Wood Buffalo National Park, Canada. , 1990, The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.

[5]  R. Kemppainen,et al.  Experimental infection of dogs with Brucella abortus: effect of exposure dose on serologic responses and comparison of culture methods. , 1989, The Cornell veterinarian.

[6]  D. Davis,et al.  INTERSPECIFIC TRANSMISSION OF BRUCELLA ABORTUS FROM EXPERIMENTALLY INFECTED COYOTES (CANIS LATRANS) TO PARTURIENT CATTLE , 1988, Journal of wildlife diseases.

[7]  J. Williams,et al.  Relationship of fetal age at conjunctival exposure of pregnant heifers and Brucella abortus isolation. , 1987, American journal of veterinary research.

[8]  S. Tessaro.  A descriptive and epizootiologic study of Brucellosis and Tuberculosis in bison in Northern Canada , 1987 .

[9]  K. Nielsen,et al.  A comparison of standard serological tests for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in Canada. , 1985, Canadian journal of comparative medicine : Revue canadienne de medecine comparee.

[10]  D. Davis,et al.  Brucella abortus IN COYOTES. I. A SEROLOGIC AND BACTERIOLOGIC SURVEY IN EASTERN TEXAS 1 , 1979, Journal of wildlife diseases.

[11]  S. Bicknell,et al.  Brucella abortus in the bitch , 1976, Veterinary Record.

[12]  D. Taylor,et al.  Brucella abortus biotype 1 as a cause of abortion in a bitch , 1975, Veterinary Record.

[13]  H. Davidson.  Brucellosis in cattle. , 1969, The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[14]  F. G. Clegg,et al.  Brucella abortus infection in the dog: a case of polyarthritis. , 1968, Research in veterinary science.

[15]  J. M. Payne.  The pathogenesis of experimental brucellosis in virgin heifers with and without continuous progesterone treatment. , 1960, Journal of Endocrinology.

[16]  J. M. Payne.  The pathogenesis of experimental brucellosis in the pregnant cow. , 1959, The Journal of pathology and bacteriology.

[17]  E. V. Morse,et al.  Canine abortion apparently due to brucella abortus. , 1953, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[18]  C. A. Manthei.  Brucellosis in cattle. , 1950 .

[19]  A. D. Mcewen,et al.  An Estimate of a Suitable Infective Dose of Br. Abortus for Immunisation Tests on Cattle , 1939 .