Deorbiting Dynamics of Electrodynamic Tether

rzhong@yorku.caAccepted 28 August 2011This paper studies satellite deorbit using electrodynamic tether (EDT) propulsion. Gaus-sian perturbation equations are used to model the orbital dynamics of EDT with envi-ronmental perturbations of electrodynamic force, aerodynamic drag and the effect ofEarth’s oblateness. Differential equations for the induced voltage-current across EDTare derived and solved with boundary conditions determined by mission objectives andhardware devices. A simplified analytical method for solving the equations is proposed toimprove computational efficiency. Simulations find that the orbit of a satellite deorbitedby EDT will become elliptical in near polar orbits due to the higher-order perturbationof Earth’s magnetic field. This is beneficial for the near polar orbits where the electro-dynamic force is less effective, because the atmosphere at a lower perigee will providelarger air drag to dissipate the orbital kinetic energy of satellite faster. Moreover, weproved that the polarity reverse of the induced voltage/current across EDT in near polarorbits does not affect the kinetic energy dissipation by the current induced Lorentz force.Compared the decay by air drag only, the orbit decaying time of a satellite with EDTwill be reduced by three and two orders of magnitudes in the equatorial and polar orbitsrespectively.Keywords: Electrtodynamic tether; deorbit; dynamics; tethered satellite; magnetic field.

[1]  Hao Wen,et al.  Advances in dynamics and control of tethered satellite systems , 2008 .

[2]  Matthew P. Cartmell,et al.  A review of space tether research , 2008 .

[3]  Ram S. Jakhu.  Iridium-Cosmos Collision and its Implications for Space Operations , 2009 .

[4]  E. C. Lorenzini,et al.  A New Kind of Dynamic Instability in Electrodynamic Tethers , 2000 .

[5]  Joseph Carroll,et al.  SEDS deployer design and flight performance , 1993 .

[6]  Manuel Sanjurjo Rivo.  Self Balanced Bare Electrodynamic Tethers. Space Debris Mitigation and other Applications , 2011 .

[7]  Robert Scott,et al.  Deorbiting of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) microsatellites , 2009 .

[8]  Shin-ichiro Nishida,et al.  Space debris removal system using a small satellite , 2006 .

[9]  Joel Storch,et al.  Aerodynamic Disturbances on Spacecraft in Free-Molecular Flow , 2002 .

[10]  K. Kumar.  Review of Dynamics and Control of Nonelectrodynamic Tethered Satellite Systems , 2006 .

[11]  Claudio Bombardelli,et al.  Retargeting Dynamics of a Linear Tethered Interferometer , 2003 .

[12]  James R. Wertz,et al.  Spacecraft attitude determination and control , 1978 .

[13]  Toshiya Hanada,et al.  Benefits and risks of using electrodynamic tethers to de-orbit spacecraft , 2006 .

[14]  Michiel Kruijff,et al.  Data Analysis of a Tethered SpaceMail Experiment , 2009 .

[15]  O. Montenbruck.  Numerical integration methods for orbital motion , 1992 .

[16]  Robert Twiggs,et al.  The Multi-Application Survivable Tether (MAST) Experiment , 2003 .

[17]  J. Sanmartín,et al.  A review of electrodynamic tethers for science applications , 2010 .

[18]  Howard D. Curtis,et al.  Orbital Mechanics for Engineering Students , 2005 .

[19]  J. A. Carroll,et al.  Guidebook for analysis of tether applications , 1985 .

[20]  Eduardo Ahedo,et al.  Bare wire anodes for electrodynamic tethers , 1993 .