Eye Gaze and Head Posture Jointly Influence Judgments of Dominance, Physical Strength, and Anger

Social status hierarchies are a universal principle of organization in human societies. Status judgments are often influenced by perceptions of the face and posture. Two important nonverbal cues of social status are head postures and eye gaze. Prior research has shown contradictory results and little is known about the interaction of these two cues. Study 1 investigated how eye gaze (direct vs. averted) and head postures (bowed vs. neutral vs. raised) impact judgments of dominance and physical strength. Judgments of dominance were influenced more than judgments of physical strength. Furthermore, raised heads implied dominance and strength, but in contrast to common assumptions, a bowed head conveyed dominance if the eyes gazed at the observer. Study 2 showed that bowed heads with direct gaze conveyed anger, potentially explaining the increased judgments of dominance. Taken together, the results show that head posture and gaze interactively modulated status-related traits and emotions, namely, dominance, strength, and anger, and help clarify prior incompatible findings on head postures and eye gaze.

[1]  Jordan B. Leitner,et al.  Enhancing static facial features increases intimidation , 2013 .

[2]  A. Senju,et al.  Direct gaze captures visuospatial attention , 2005 .

[3]  Łukasz Żurawski,et al.  Do Dynamic Compared to Static Facial Expressions of Happiness and Anger Reveal Enhanced Facial Mimicry? , 2016, PloS one.

[4]  B. Fink,et al.  Geometric morphometrics of male facial shape in relation to physical strength and perceived attractiveness, dominance, and masculinity , 2011, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[5]  D. Burke,et al.  A New Viewpoint on the Evolution of Sexually Dimorphic Human Faces , 2010, Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior.

[6]  Phoebe C. Ellsworth,et al.  Sentimental Stereotypes: Emotional Expectations for High-and Low-Status Group Members , 2000 .

[7]  D. Perrett,et al.  Emotional expression modulates perceived gaze direction. , 2008, Emotion.

[8]  C. Macrae,et al.  A boy primed Sue: feature‐based processing and person construal , 2007 .

[9]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Center-surround patterns emerge as optimal predictors for human saccade targets. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[10]  Michael Gurven,et al.  Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  J. Henrich,et al.  The evolution of prestige: freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. , 2001, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[12]  J. H. Steiger Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. , 1980 .

[13]  Tom Foulsham,et al.  Two ways to the top: evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. , 2013, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  P. Sessa,et al.  Race perception and gaze direction differently impair visual working memory for faces: An event-related potential study , 2016, Social neuroscience.

[15]  M. Bindemann,et al.  How do eye gaze and facial expression interact? , 2008 .

[16]  A. Little,et al.  Integrating Gaze Direction and Sexual Dimorphism of Face Shape When Perceiving the Dominance of Others , 2009, Perception.

[17]  Andrew W. Young,et al.  Social inferences from faces: Ambient images generate a three-dimensional model , 2013, Cognition.

[18]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The human anger face evolved to enhance cues of strength , 2014 .

[19]  Reginald B. Adams,et al.  Knowing Who's Boss: fMRI and ERP Investigations of Social Dominance Perception , 2008, Group processes & intergroup relations : GPIR.

[20]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Who Is the Boss and Who Is Not? Accuracy of Judging Status , 2004 .

[21]  Thomas W. Schubert,et al.  Judgments of Dominance from the Face Track Physical Strength , 2014, Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior.

[22]  Jean-Marc Fellous,et al.  Facial resemblance to emotions: group differences, impression effects, and race stereotypes. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Joan Y. Chiao,et al.  Neural basis of social status hierarchy across species , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[24]  Christine L. Larson,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Visual Cognition What Makes an Angry Face Look so … Angry? Examining Visual Attention to the Shape of Threat in Children and Adults , 2022 .

[25]  Reginald B. Adams,et al.  Why Do Fear and Anger Look the Way They Do? Form and Social Function in Facial Expressions , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[26]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status , 2008 .

[27]  Andrew W. Young,et al.  Facial first impressions from another angle: How social judgements are influenced by changeable and invariant facial properties , 2017, British journal of psychology.

[28]  T. Schneider,et al.  Taking the Perfect Selfie: Investigating the Impact of Perspective on the Perception of Higher Cognitive Variables , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[29]  A. Little,et al.  Facial cues of dominance modulate the short-term gaze-cuing effect in human observers , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  A. Calder,et al.  Why are you angry with me? Facial expressions of threat influence perception of gaze direction. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[31]  Joshua Correll,et al.  Of Kith and Kin: Perceptual Enrichment, Expectancy, and Reciprocity in Face Perception , 2017, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[32]  A. Pusey Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex among Apes, France de Waal. Harper & Row, New York (1982), 223, Price $16.50 , 1984 .

[33]  Reginald B. Adams,et al.  Perceptions of Dominance following Glimpses of Faces and Bodies , 2012, Perception.

[34]  A. Baird,et al.  Eye-Gaze Direction Modulates Race-Related Amygdala Activity , 2008 .

[35]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Facial Attractiveness Ratings from Video-Clips and Static Images Tell the Same Story , 2011, PloS one.

[36]  Richard G. Coss,et al.  Perceptual Determinants of Gaze Aversion By the Lesser Mouse Lemur (Microcebus Murinus), the Role of Two Facing Eyes , 1978 .

[37]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Ecological and Social Approaches to Face Perception , 2011 .

[38]  B. Knutson Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences , 1996 .

[39]  Joshua M. Tybur,et al.  The Evolutionary Foundations of Hierarchy : Status , Dominance , Prestige , and Leadership , 2014 .

[40]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Perception of facial characteristics by monkeys. , 1990 .

[41]  Reginald B. Adams,et al.  Personality in Perspective: Judgmental Consistency across Orientations of the Face , 2009, Perception.

[42]  Y. Trope,et al.  Body Cues, Not Facial Expressions, Discriminate Between Intense Positive and Negative Emotions , 2012, Science.

[43]  N. Ambady,et al.  A dynamic interactive theory of person construal. , 2011, Psychological review.

[44]  S. Tipper,et al.  The Impact of Social Gaze Perception on Attention , 2011 .

[45]  L. Tiedens,et al.  Anger and advancement versus sadness and subjugation: the effect of negative emotion expressions on social status conferral. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  J. N. Bassili Emotion recognition: the role of facial movement and the relative importance of upper and lower areas of the face. , 1979, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  C. Judd Everyday data analysis in social psychology: Comparisons of linear models. , 2000 .

[48]  John Tooby,et al.  Formidability and the logic of human anger , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  D. Perrett,et al.  Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness , 1998, Nature.

[50]  A. Fiske The four elementary forms of sociality: framework for a unified theory of social relations. , 1992, Psychological review.

[51]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[52]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Eye contact detection in humans from birth , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  A. Todorov,et al.  The functional basis of face evaluation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  A. Burton,et al.  Variability in photos of the same face , 2011, Cognition.

[55]  A. Todorov,et al.  Misleading First Impressions , 2014, Psychological science.

[56]  A. Chaudhuri,et al.  The Many Faces of a Neutral Face: Head Tilt and Perception of Dominance and Emotion , 2003 .

[57]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Visual attention to powerful postures: People avert their gaze from nonverbal dominance displays , 2017 .

[58]  S. Baron-Cohen The Eye Direction Detector (EDD) and the Shared Attention Mechanism (SAM): Two cases for evolutionar , 1995 .

[59]  Michelle K. Ryan,et al.  The Power of Pictures: Vertical Picture Angles in Power Pictures , 2011 .

[60]  C. Rueden The Roots and Fruits of Social Status in Small-Scale Human Societies , 2014 .

[61]  G. Galfano,et al.  Social status gates social attention in humans , 2012, Biology Letters.

[62]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[63]  Ruth Campbell,et al.  Real Men Don't Look Down: Direction of Gaze Affects Sex Decisions on Faces , 1996 .

[64]  Jonathan B Freeman,et al.  Static and Dynamic Facial Cues Differentially Affect the Consistency of Social Evaluations , 2015, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[65]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: a meta-analysis. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[66]  M. Vugt,et al.  The Status-Size Hypothesis: How Cues of Physical Size and Social Status Influence Each Other , 2014 .

[67]  Denise Dellarosa Cummins,et al.  Dominance, Status, and Social Hierarchies , 2015 .

[68]  Alexander Todorov,et al.  Reverse Correlating Social Face Perception , 2012 .

[69]  Patricia S. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Face scanning and responsiveness to social cues in infant rhesus monkeys. , 1982 .

[70]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  Life after P-Hacking , 2013 .

[71]  Thomas W. Schubert,et al.  Physical Strength as a Cue to Dominance , 2016, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[72]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  The role of physical formidability in human social status allocation. , 2016, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[73]  C. Darwin The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals , .

[74]  G. Vining,et al.  Data Analysis: A Model-Comparison Approach , 1989 .

[75]  G. Galfano,et al.  Temporal Dynamics Underlying the Modulation of Social Status on Social Attention , 2014, PloS one.

[76]  R. Baron,et al.  Toward an Ecological Theory of Social Perception , 1983 .

[77]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: a new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[78]  H. Meeren,et al.  Beyond the face: exploring rapid influences of context on face processing. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[79]  U. Hess,et al.  The Influence of Facial Emotion Displays, Gender, and Ethnicity on Judgments of Dominance and Affiliation , 2000 .

[80]  Lester M. Hyman,et al.  Which are the stimuli in facial displays of anger and happiness? Configurational bases of emotion recognition. , 1992 .

[81]  M. Argyle,et al.  Gaze and Mutual Gaze , 1994, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[82]  J. Tybur,et al.  The evolutionary foundations of status and hierarchy: Dominance, prestige, power, and leadership , 2015 .

[83]  H. Hecht,et al.  Judging Body Weight from Faces: The Height—Weight Illusion , 2012, Perception.

[84]  Ursula Hess,et al.  The Role of Social Context for the Interpretation of Emotional Facial Expressions , 2015 .

[85]  Alexander Todorov,et al.  Contributions of facial expressions and body language to the rapid perception of dynamic emotions , 2016, Cognition & emotion.