Speech intelligibility and localization in a multi-source environment.

Natural environments typically contain sound sources other than the source of interest that may interfere with the ability of listeners to extract information about the primary source. Studies of speech intelligibility and localization by normal-hearing listeners in the presence of competing speech are reported on in this work. One, two or three competing sentences [IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. 17(3), 225-246 (1969)] were presented from various locations in the horizontal plane in several spatial configurations relative to a target sentence. Target and competing sentences were spoken by the same male talker and at the same level. All experiments were conducted both in an actual sound field and in a virtual sound field. In the virtual sound field, both binaural and monaural conditions were tested. In the speech intelligibility experiment, there were significant improvements in performance when the target and competing sentences were spatially separated. Performance was similar in the actual sound-field and virtual sound-field binaural listening conditions for speech intelligibility. Although most of these improvements are evident monaurally when using the better ear, binaural listening was necessary for large improvements in some situations. In the localization experiment, target source identification was measured in a seven-alternative absolute identification paradigm with the same competing sentence configurations as for the speech study. Performance in the localization experiment was significantly better in the actual sound-field than in the virtual sound-field binaural listening conditions. Under binaural conditions, localization performance was very good, even in the presence of three competing sentences. Under monaural conditions, performance was much worse. For the localization experiment, there was no significant effect of the number or configuration of the competing sentences tested. For these experiments, the performance in the speech intelligibility experiment was not limited by localization ability.

[1]  M. Ericson,et al.  The Intelligibility of Multiple Talkers Separated Spatially in Noise , 2001 .

[2]  F. Wightman,et al.  Sound localization in the presence of multiple distracters , 1997 .

[3]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Directivity of binaural noise reduction in spatial multiple noise-source arrangements for normal and impaired listeners. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  F L Wightman,et al.  Monaural sound localization revisited. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  D Pralong,et al.  The role of individualized headphone calibration for the generation of high fidelity virtual auditory space. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  J M Besing,et al.  A Procedure for Testing Speech Intelligibility in a Virtual Listening Environment , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[7]  R. Gilkey,et al.  Sound localization in noise: the effect of signal-to-noise ratio. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Anderson Tr,et al.  The accuracy of absolute localization judgments for speech stimuli. , 1995 .

[9]  J M Besing,et al.  A Test of Virtual Auditory Localization , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[10]  H. Dillon,et al.  An international comparison of long‐term average speech spectra , 1994 .

[11]  John C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Monaural sound localization: Acute versus chronic unilateral impairment , 1994, Hearing Research.

[12]  S. Soli,et al.  Norms for a headphone simulation of the Hearing in Noise Test: Comparison of physical and simulated spatial separation of sound sources , 1994 .

[13]  S M Abel,et al.  Sound localization: effects of reverberation time, speaker array, stimulus frequency, and stimulus rise/decay. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  F L Wightman,et al.  Localization using nonindividualized head-related transfer functions. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  R Plomp,et al.  Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  William A. Yost,et al.  Auditory Perception and Sound Source Determination , 1992 .

[17]  F. Wightman,et al.  The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Albert S. Bregman,et al.  The Auditory Scene. (Book Reviews: Auditory Scene Analysis. The Perceptual Organization of Sound.) , 1990 .

[20]  F L Wightman,et al.  Headphone simulation of free-field listening. I: Stimulus synthesis. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  F L Wightman,et al.  Headphone simulation of free-field listening. II: Psychophysical validation. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  E. Shaw,et al.  Transformation of sound-pressure level from the free field to the eardrum presented in numerical form. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  A. Duquesnoy Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  A. Nabelek,et al.  Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  B. Franklin Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance. , 1981 .

[26]  R R Coles,et al.  Binaural advantages in hearing of speech , 1971, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[27]  D D Dirks,et al.  The effect of spatially separated sound sources on speech intelligibility. , 1969, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[28]  E. Harford,et al.  A REHABILITATIVE APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM OF UNILATERAL HEARING IMPAIRMENT: THE CONTRALATERAL ROUTING OF SIGNALS CROS. , 1965, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[29]  R CARHART,et al.  Binnaural hearing aids and speech intelligibility. , 1961, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[30]  Irwin Pollack,et al.  Stereophonic Listening and Speech Intelligibility against Voice Babble , 1958 .

[31]  E. C. Cherry Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears , 1953 .

[32]  Ira J. Hirsh,et al.  The Relation between Localization and Intelligibility , 1950 .

[33]  S. Sheft,et al.  A simulated “cocktail party” with up to three sound sources , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  R H Gilkey,et al.  The accuracy of absolute localization judgments for speech stimuli. , 1995, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[35]  D. M. Green,et al.  Sound localization by human listeners. , 1991, Annual review of psychology.

[36]  R Plomp,et al.  A clinical test for the assessment of binaural speech perception in noise. , 1990, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[37]  George Casella,et al.  Statistical Inference , 1990 .

[38]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Effect of the orientation of the speaker's head and azimuth of a noise source on the speech reception threshold for sentences , 1980 .

[39]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[40]  IEEE Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measurements , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics.