DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF LEARNER EFFORT AND GOAL ORIENTATION ON TWO LEARNING OUTCOMES

Ti-aining research is beginning to examine the trainee as an active participant in the learning process. One component of this process involves the choices learners make about the effort they will apply to the learning task. Learner effort was examined in two ways: amount of effort and type of effort. Both amount and type of effort were measured in multiple ways. The results indicated that mastery orientation and time on task were the strongest predictors of performance on the knowledge learning outcome, while perceived mental workload and the use of an example during learning predicted performance on the application learning outcome. Implications for training practice and research are discussed. Given the substantial investment in time and resources devoted to training and education every year, psychologists in many disciplines have investigated influences on individual learning. Learning is typically defined as "a relatively permanent change in knowledge or skill produced by experience" (Weiss, 1990, p. 172). In organizationa l settings, we are often interested in knowledge and skill acquisition and retention as a function of some training experience (Baldwin & Ford, 1988; Goldstein, 1993). Much of training research has focused on the learner as a passive recipient rather than an active participant to various interventions or designs (Ford & Kraiger, 1995). The training literature has begun to examine the impact of increasing the level of participation of trainees in their own training. Most of this research has examined pretraining activities such as increasing trainee participation in the identification of training needs, the determination of the training content, the design of This article is based on the first author's master's thesis, conducted under the supervision of Kevin Ford at Michigan State University. An earlier version of this article was presented at the 11th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.

[1]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[2]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. , 1973 .

[3]  Leslie J. Briggs,et al.  Principles of Instructional Design , 1974 .

[4]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing , 1977 .

[5]  I. Goldstein Training in Work Organizations , 1980 .

[6]  F. J. Vesta,et al.  What Is Learned in Note Taking , 1981 .

[7]  John R. Anderson Acquisition of cognitive skill. , 1982 .

[8]  R. Gagne Learning outcomes and their effects: Useful categories of human performance. , 1984 .

[9]  J. Levin Four Cognitive Principles of Learning-Strategy Instruction , 1986 .

[10]  Carol S. Dweck,et al.  Motivational processes affecting learning. , 1986 .

[11]  Ronald R. Schmeck,et al.  INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND LEARNING STRATEGIES , 1988 .

[12]  Timothy T. Baldwin,et al.  TRANSFER OF TRAINING: A REVIEW AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH , 1988 .

[13]  J. Meece,et al.  Students' goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities , 1988 .

[14]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[15]  C. Dweck,et al.  A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality , 1988 .

[16]  H L Roediger,et al.  The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[17]  E. R. Steinberg Cognition and learner control: a literature review, 1977–1988 , 1989 .

[18]  T. Connolly,et al.  Goals, strategy development and task performance: Some limits on the efficacy of goal setting , 1989 .

[19]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Motivation and cognitive abilities: an integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition , 1989 .

[20]  J. Ford,et al.  Process tracing methods: Contributions, problems, and neglected research questions , 1989 .

[21]  T. O. Nelson Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings , 1990 .

[22]  Howard M. Weiss,et al.  Learning theory and industrial and organizational psychology. , 1990 .

[23]  W. Milheim,et al.  Theoretical bases for the use of learner control: Three different perspectives. , 1991 .

[24]  G. Yukl,et al.  Training and development in work organizations. , 1992 .

[25]  F. Paas Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. , 1992 .

[26]  R. Schmidt,et al.  New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training , 1992 .

[27]  P. Hancock,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of a Model of Mental Workload , 1993 .

[28]  E. Salas,et al.  Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. , 1993 .

[29]  Steffanie L. Wilk,et al.  Investigation of the factors that influence employees' participation in development activities. , 1993 .

[30]  Joseph S. Mattoon,et al.  Controlling Challenge in Instructional Simulation , 1993 .

[31]  F. Paas,et al.  Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skills: A Cognitive-Load Approach , 1994 .

[32]  J. Anderson,et al.  Acquisition of procedural skills from examples. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Goal setting, conditions of practice, and task performance: A resource allocation perspective. , 1994 .

[34]  Marsha C. Lovett,et al.  Effects of solving related proofs on memory and transfer in geometry problem solving. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Goal Orientation in Organizational Research: A Conceptual and Empirical Foundation , 1996 .