Performance analysis of Isopropanol–Acetone–Hydrogen chemical heat pump

The performance of an Isopropanol–Acetone–Hydrogen (IAH) chemical heat pump system is investigated in terms of enthalpy efficiency (COP) and exergy efficiency, in which the exothermic and endothermic reactions take place in the gas phase. The increase of reflux ratio, temperature of endothermic reaction and temperature of exothermic reaction reduces the performance of the heat pump when the other operating parameters remain unchanged. However, the performance of the IAH chemical heat pump improves with the increase of the ratio of molar quantity of hydrogen to that of acetone in the entry of exothermic reactor and the number of heat transfer units of regenerator. Generally, a better performance of the chemical heat pump corresponds to a larger number of trays in the distillation column. The performance of the system can be improved significantly after multi-parameter optimization design. The coefficient of performance (COP) pays more attention to the heat released from the exothermic reactor, while the exergy efficiency takes into consideration of both heat released from the exothermic reactor and temperature of exothermic reaction.

[1]  A. Bejan,et al.  Entropy Generation Through Heat and Fluid Flow , 1983 .

[2]  Yeong-Koo Yeo,et al.  Optimal design of a chemical heat pump using the 2-propanol/acetone/hydrogen system , 1997 .

[3]  Peter Harriott,et al.  Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering , 2004 .

[4]  N. Meng Improvements on thermal efficiency of chemical heat pump involving the reaction couple of 2-propanol dehydrogenation and acetone hydrogenation , 1997 .

[5]  Mingtian Xu,et al.  The application of field synergy number in shell-and-tube heat exchanger optimization design , 2009 .

[6]  Mario Montes,et al.  Effect of the design variables on the energy performance and size parameters of a heat transformer based on the system acetone/H2/2-propanol , 1992 .

[7]  Mingtian Xu,et al.  Multi-Objective Optimization of Heat Exchanger Design by Entropy Generation Minimization , 2010 .

[8]  Pierre Neveu,et al.  A review of chemical heat pump technology and applications , 2001 .

[9]  Don W. Green,et al.  Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook , 2007 .

[10]  Christopher R. Houck,et al.  A Genetic Algorithm for Function Optimization: A Matlab Implementation , 2001 .

[11]  Pornpote Piumsomboon,et al.  Isopropanol–acetone–hydrogen chemical heat pump: A demonstration unit , 2007 .

[12]  Hasan Demir,et al.  A review on adsorption heat pump: Problems and solutions , 2008 .

[13]  D. P. Sekulic,et al.  Fundamentals of Heat Exchanger Design , 2003 .

[14]  Morten Boje Blarke,et al.  Towards an intermittency-friendly energy system: Comparing electric boilers and heat pumps in distributed cogeneration , 2012 .

[15]  Mingtian Xu,et al.  Optimization design of shell-and-tube heat exchanger by entropy generation minimization and genetic algorithm , 2009 .

[16]  Mingtian Xu,et al.  The Entropy Generation Minimisation based on the Revised Entropy Generation Number , 2010 .

[17]  Kunio Yoshida,et al.  Catalyst‐assisted chemical heat pump with reaction couple of acetone hydrogenation/2–propanol dehydrogenation for upgrading low‐level thermal energy: Proposal and evaluation , 1987 .

[18]  Pornpote Piumsomboon,et al.  Dynamic Simulation and Control of an Isopropanol-Acetone-Hydrogen Chemical Heat Pump , 2004 .

[19]  M. Sakurai,et al.  Fundamental study of a non-steady operation for 2-propanol de-hydrogenation , 2007 .

[20]  Yeong Koo Yeo,et al.  Chemical heat pump based on dehydrogenation and hydrogenation of i-propanol and acetone , 1992 .

[21]  W. Mooksuwan,et al.  Study on 2‐propanol/acetone/hydrogen chemical heat pump: endothermic dehydrogenation of 2‐propanol , 2000 .

[22]  Modelling and simulation of the chemical reaction heat pump system adopting the reactive distillation process , 1997 .

[23]  R. Rioux,et al.  Hydrogenation/dehydrogenation reactions: isopropanol dehydrogenation over copper catalysts , 2003 .