Analyzing impact factors of CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model

Abstract Using the STIRPAT model, this paper analyzes the impact of population, affluence and technology on the total CO 2 emissions of countries at different income levels over the period 1975–2000. Our main results show at the global level that economic growth has the greatest impact on CO 2 emissions, and the proportion of the population between ages 15 and 64 has the least impact. The proportion of the population between 15 and 64 has a negative impact on the total CO 2 emissions of countries at the high income level, but the impact is positive at other income levels. This may illustrate the importance of the “ B ” in the “ I  =  PABT ”; that is to say that different behavior fashions can greatly influence environmental change. For low-income countries, the impact of GDP per capita on total CO 2 emissions is very great, and the impact of energy intensity in upper-middle income countries is very great. The impact of these factors on the total CO 2 emissions of countries at the high income level is relatively great. Therefore, these empirical results indicate that the impact of population, affluence and technology on CO 2 emissions varies at different levels of development. Thus, policy-makers should consider these matters fully when they construct their long-term strategies for CO 2 abatement.

[1]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  IMPACT OF POPULATION GROWTH , 1971, Science.

[2]  Rajen Mookerjee,et al.  Population growth and global CO2 emissions : a secular perspective , 1996 .

[3]  Peter C. Schulze,et al.  News and viewsI=PBAT , 2002 .

[4]  A. Shi Population Growth and Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions , 2001 .

[5]  P E Waggoner,et al.  A framework for sustainability science: A renovated IPAT identity , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Bridging Environmental Science with Environmental Policy: Plasticity of Population, Affluence, and Technology , 2002 .

[7]  Bernard T. Feld,et al.  III. Current Developments and Dangers of Atomic Armaments , 1972 .

[8]  E. Rosa,et al.  STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts , 2003 .

[9]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  World Carbon Dioxide Emissions: 19502050 , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[10]  E. Rosa,et al.  Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  T. Malthus Essay on the Principle of Population , 2001 .

[12]  Matthew A. Cole,et al.  The environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical analysis , 1997, Environment and Development Economics.

[13]  Soumyananda Dinda,et al.  Causality between income and emission: a country group-specific econometric analysis , 2002 .

[14]  M. Chertow The IPAT Equation and Its Variants , 2000 .

[15]  Frederick A. B. Meyerson Population carbon emissions and global warming: the forgotten relationship at Kyoto. , 1998 .

[16]  M. Diesendorf I=PAT or I=PBAT? , 2002 .

[17]  Ester Boserup,et al.  The conditions of agricultural growth , 2013 .

[18]  A. Shi,et al.  The impact of population pressure on global carbon dioxide emissions, 1975-1996: evidence from pooled cross-country data , 2003 .

[19]  Vernon W. Ruttan,et al.  Population and Technological Change: A Study of Long-Term Trends by Ester Boserup (review) , 1982 .